Creating New Information and Communication Models in Working with Users within the Google Library Project

The article analyzes characteristic features and development logic of the library project by Google, which started from the famous Google Book Search project (also known as Google Books and Google Print), and later as Google Play Books within the multi-platform multimedia service Google Play. For decades, a constant trend of the corporation’s activity has been the development and testing of new social and communication models in working with users, combining the complexity and global reach of the audience with the use of its interactive potential. In the early 2000s, the company initiated mass scanning of library collections, thus starting the development of a new institutional paradigm for electronic libraries. Later, having developed new business models for the distribution of electronic copies of printed products in the course of numerous legal proceedings on charges of copyright infringement, it also pioneered the new information market development.

From the very beginning, Google Book Search was aimed at the mass user, which was facilitated by its constantly expanding set of options and increasing level of comfort of access to the resource. In 2006—2010, the service presented an opportunity for users to download, in pdf format, books free of copyright law; a new viewing interface “About this book” was added; an opportunity to operate texts using “My library” option was provided; a mobile version of the service was launched; access to statistical information on diachronic frequency dynamics of word usage based on the collected database was provided.

The article analyzes the further development of the library project within the Google Play Books service, which allows users to read, buy and sell e-books, use bookmarks, download their own books in pdf and EPUB formats, and synchronize data on all user’s devices. There is assessed the social significance of the project in the context of the global electronic civilization development.

1. Savitskaya T.E. Google Book Search Project: The Pros and Cons, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2016, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 420—428. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2016-13-4-420-428 (in Russ.).

2. Savitskaya T.E. Lessons of the Google Book Search: What Is Next? Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2016, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 534—538. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2016-13-5-534-538 (in Russ.).

3. Savitskaya T.E. Google Book Search Project and Alternative Experience of Formation of E-Libraries, Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science], 2016, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 522—530. DOI: 10.25281/0869-608X-2016-65-5-522-530 (in Russ.).

4. Rosenberg S. How Google Book Search Got Lost, Wired, 04.11.2017. Available at: https://www.wired.com/2017/04/how-google-book-search-got-lost/ (accessed 04.03.2019).

5. Ries A. Googlization of Marketing, Advertology. Nauka o reklame [Advertology. The Science of Advertising]. Available at: http://www.advertology.ru/article27806.html (accessed 05.03.20019) (in Russ.).

6. Taycher L. Books of the World, Stand Up and Be Counted! All 129,864,880 of You, Google Book Search. Available at: http://booksearch.blogspot.com/2010/08/books-of-world-stand-up-and-be-counted.html (accessed 05.03.2019).

7. Samuelson P. Google Books Is Not a Library, HuffPost, May 25, 2011. Available at: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/google-books-is-not-a-lib_b_317518 (accessed 05.03.2019).

8. Somers J. Torching the Modern-Day Library of Alexandria, The Atlantic, April 20, 2017. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/04/the-tragedy-of-google-books/523320/ (accessed 12.03.2019).

9. Wu T. What Ever Happened to Google Books? The New Yorker, September 12, 2015. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/what-ever-happened-to-google-books (accessed 05.03.2019).

10. Google Books History, Google Books. Available at: https://books.google.com/googlebooks/about/history.html (accessed 07.03.2019).

11. Hoffmann A.L. Google Books as Infrastructure of In/justice: Towards a Sociotechnical Account of Rawlsian Justice, Information, and Technology, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. UWM Digital Commons, May 2014. Available at: https://dc.uwm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1535&context=etd (accessed 07.03.2019).

12. Petrov I. Google Books: What Happened and What to Do? Livejournal, 07.11.2016. Available at: https://labas.livejournal.com/1158059.html (accessed 11.03.2019) (in Russ.).

13. Walsh A. Blurring the Boundaries between Our Physical and Electronic Libraries: Location Aware Technology, QR codes and RFID-Tags, The Electronic Library, 2011, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 429—437. DOI: 10.1108/02640471111156713.

14. Whitmer S. Google Books: Shamed by Snobs, a Resource for the Rest of Us, The Computer Guide to Using Google in Libraries. Vol. 2: Research, User Applications and Networking. New York, Rowman and Littlefield Publ., 2015, pp. 241—250.

15. Townsend R.B. Google Books: Is It Good for History? Perspectives on History, 2007, September. Available at: https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/september-2007/google-books-is-it-good-for-history (accessed 18.03.2019).

16. Nunberg G. Google Book Search: A Disaster for Scholars, The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 31, 2009. Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/article/Googles-Book-Search-A/48245 (accessed 18.03.2019).

17. Howard J. What Happened to Google s Effort to Scan Millions of University Library Books? EDSurge, August 10, 2017. Available at: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-08-10-what-happened-to-google-s-effort-to-scan-millions-of-university-library-books (accessed 18.03.2019).

18. Solovyov V.D. What Can the Google Books Ngram Corpus Give for Understanding the Mechanisms of Preserving and Transmitting Knowledge in Human Society? Kazanskii federal’nyi universitet [Kazan Federal University]. Available at: https://kpfu.ru/portal/docs/F1429724929/doklad.na.kognitivnom.seminare.Chernigovskoj.pdf (accessed 19.03.2019) (in Russ.).

19. Zakharov V.P., Masevich A.Ts. The Experience of Corpus-Subjected Historical-Cultural Studies of Historical and Political Vocabulary, Bibliosfera [Bibliosphere], 2016, no. 2, pp. 47—55. DOI: 10.20913/1815-3186-2016-2-47-55 (in Russ.).

20. Heyman S. Google Books: A Complex and Controversial Experiment, The New York Times, October 28, 2015. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/29/arts/international/google-books-a-complex-and-controversial-experiment.html (accessed 19.03.2018).

21. Book Status and Availability, Spravka Google [Google Help]. Available at: https://support.google.com/books/partner/answer/3291443?hl=ru (accessed 20.03.2019) (in Russ.).

22. Trofimova T. What Is Google Books Hiding and From Whom?: A Reader’s Experience, Chastnyi korrespondent [Private Correspondent], December 27, 2009. Available at: http://www.chaskor.ru/article/chto_i_ot_kogo_skryvaet_google_books__13088 (accessed 19.03.2019) (in Russ.).

23. 75 Interesting Google Play Statistics and Facts (2020) By the Numbers, DMR. Business Statistics. Available at: https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/google-play-statistics-facts/ (accessed 21.03.2019).