Dynamics of the Cultural Benefits Provision to the Russian Population (2000—2019)

The article studies the dynamics of the cultural benefits provision to the Russian population from the point of view of the main functional types in the period of 2000—2019, and develops proposals to overcome the existing imbalances. The study is aimed at determining the composition of indicators that characterize the population’s provision with conditions and services in the field of culture; forming a database of five functional types for the period of 2000—2019; selecting the methods of analysis, as well as analyzing the dynamics of the cultural benefits provision to the Russian population; assessing the positive effects and negative consequences of the cultural institutions network optimization.

To this end, the article analyzes the statistical data of the Main Information and Computing Center of the Ministry of Culture of Russia, examines the legislative acts regulating the state guarantees of providing the population with cultural benefits. For each functional type (theaters, concert organizations and independent groups, museums, libraries, cultural and leisure institutions), the authors select the indicators that characterize conditions and services in the field of culture and compare them with the indicators of attendance and demand for the services by the population. The article applies an indicative model using the methods of horizontal (temporal), vertical (structural) comparative analysis. There is revealed that, firstly, the dynamics of the cultural benefits provision to the Russian population during the specified period was uneven in terms of functional types; secondly, the measures to improve the efficiency of cultural budget expenditures led to some positive changes in the conditions of provision. At the same time, there were certain imbalances in the form of a decrease in the provision of cultural benefits to the population and reduced opportunities for participation in cultural life due to some unreasonable optimization of the network of libraries and cultural and leisure institutions. The study concludes that the identified negative trends can be neutralized by creation of new cultural development centers, active introduction of mobile forms of cultural services and inclusive forms of working with people with special needs, modern digital technologies, development of cultural and educational tourism, volunteerism.

1. Culture for Sustainable Development, YuNESKO: ofits. sait [UNESCO: official website]. Available at: https://ru.unesco.org/themes/kultura-i-ustoychivoe-razvitie (accessed 09.04.2020) (in Russ.).

2. Hosagrahar J. Culture: At the Heart of SDGs, Kur’er YuNESKO [The UNESCO Courier], 2017, April—June, pp. 12—14. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248116_rus/PDF/248106rus.pdf.multi.nameddest=248116 (accessed 22.04.2020) (in Russ.).

3. Nikonorova E.V. Culture and Sustainable Development: The Grounds for Interaction and Contours of Integration, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2016, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 644—651. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2016-13-6-644-651 (in Russ.).

4. UNESCO Culture for Development Indicators (CDIS), UNESCO. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/creativity/activities/cdis (accessed 22.04.2020).

5. Guide to Eurostat Culture Statistics. 2018 Edition: Manuals and Guidelines. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 2018. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/9433072/KS-GQ-18-011-EN-N.pdf/72981708-edb7-4007-a298-8b5d9d5a61b5 (accessed 22.04.2020).

6. Final Consumption Expenditure of Households, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SNA_TABLE5# (accessed 22.04.2020).

7. Fundamentals of the Russian Federation Legislation on Culture (approved by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on 09.10.1992 No 3612-1) (revised on 05.12.2017), Vedomosti S’’ezda narodnykh deputatov Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Gazette of the Congress of People’s Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation], 1992, no. 46, art. 2615 (in Russ.).

8. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Adopted by Resolution 217(III) of the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1948, OON: ofits. sait [UN: official website]. Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/declhr.shtml (accessed 22.04.2020) (in Russ.).

9. The Constitution of the Russian Federation, Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2014, no. 31, art. 4398 (in Russ.).

10. Malshina N.A. Cultural Services — General Classification, Nauchnoe obozrenie. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Scientific Review. Economic Sciences], 2016, no. 3, pp. 42—55 (in Russ.).

11. Throsby D. Economics and Culture. Moscow, Dom Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki Publ., 2013, 256 p. (in Russ.).

12. Rubinshtein A.Ya. Opekaemye blaga v sfere kul’tury: priznaki i posledstviya “bolezni tsen” [Patronized Goods in the Sphere of Culture: “Price Disease” Features and Effects]. Moscow, Institut Ekonomiki RAN Publ., 2012, 78 p.

13. Shishkin S.V. Ekonomika sotsial’noi sfery: uchebnoe posobie [Economics of the Social Sphere: textbook]. Moscow, GU VShE Publ., 2003, 367 p.

14. Yakobson L.I. Ekonomika obshchestvennogo sektora. Osnovy teorii gosudarstvennykh finansov [Economics of the Public Sector. Fundamentals of the Theory of Public Finance]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 1996, 319 p.

15. Muzychuk V.Yu. Dolzhno li gosudarstvo finansirovat’ kul’turu? [Should the State Finance Culture?]. Moscow, Institut Ekonomiki RAN Publ., 2012, 60 p.

16. Abankina T.V. Models of Financial Support for Culture, Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World], 2015, no. 5, pp. 48—60 (in Russ.).

17. Gorushkina S.N. How to Determine the Provision of Cultural Institutions in Communities? Spravochnik rukovoditelya uchrezhdeniya kul’tury [Cultural Institution Administrator’s Reference Book], 2016, no. 11, pp. 40—50 (in Russ.).

18. Astafieva O.N., Gorushkina S.N. Theoretical Conceptualization and Practical Activities of the Government in the Issue of Sufficient Provision of Population with the Library Services, Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science], 2017, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 367–377. DOI: 10.25281/0869-608X-2017-66-4-367-377 (in Russ.).

19. AIS “Statisticheskaya otchetnost’ otrasli” GIVTs Minkul’tury Rossii [“Statistical Reporting of the Industry” Automated Information System of the Main Information and Computing Center of the Ministry of Culture of Russia]. Available at: https://stat.mkrf.ru/ (accessed 22.04.2019).

20. Barinov S., Abankina T. Atlas of Russian Regions. People Supply with Cultural Goods (May 14, 2020), XXI April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3600969.

21. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 22, 2004, No 249 “On Measures to Improve the Effectiveness of Budget Expenditures”, Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2004, no. 22, art. 2180 (in Russ.).

22. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 31.01.2019 No 117-r “On Approval of the Concept of Improving the Efficiency of Budget Expenditures in 2019—2024”, Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2019, no. 6, art. 542 (in Russ.).