Formation and Development Determinants of the City Commemorative Culture
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2021-18-2-127-139
Abstract
Based on historical-genetic and comparative research methods, the article reveals the determinants of formation and development of the city commemorative culture. This issue is relevant because of the increasing influence of the memory of the past on modern sociocultural processes. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the study of poorly studied issues of the impact of commemorative culture on the development of culture in general; the opportunities of regulating the nature and distribution of memorial forms; the factors determining the formation of the city commemorative culture in the context of the historical and sociocultural dynamics of applicable societies of the civilizations of the past and present. The article uses an integrated approach, which determines the interdisciplinary nature of scientific research, allowing analyzing the aspects of the origin, interpretation of the features of the history and existence of monuments in different cultures. There are provided examples of commemoration practices in the post-Soviet countries, including the Republic of Belarus. The article concludes that the content of commemorative culture is determined primarily by religious traditions and state priorities. The creation of monuments and places of memory is used as an agitation and manipulative resource making an emotional impact; as an ideological tool shaping the perception of history in accordance with the state ideology. Commemorative practices take on special significance during the formation of nations, influencing the subject’s identification with the nation, and the awareness of national solidity. In this case, the monument represents a universal form of embodying and conveying the national idea.
About the Author
Olga M. SokolovaBelarus
17, Rabkorovskaya Str., Minsk, 220007, Belarus
ORCID 0000-0002-5213-8410; SPIN 8654-1452
References
1. Eliade M. Ocherki sravnitel’nogo religiovedeniya [Patterns in Comparative Religion]. Moscow, Ladomir Publ., 1999, 488 p.
2. Eliade M. Gilgamesh in Search for Immortality, Istoriya very i religioznykh idei. T. 1. Ot kamennogo veka do elevsinskikh misterii [History of Religious Beliefs and Ideas. Vol. 1. From the Stone Age to the Mysteries of Eleusis]. Moscow, Kriterion Publ., 2002, pp. 75—78 (in Russ.).
3. Bass V.G. The Monument: Who Controls the Past? On a Special Commemoration Mechanism, Sotsiologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power], 2017, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 122—155 (in Russ.).
4. Wilkinson T. Bricks and Mortals. The Story of Our Lives in Ten Buildings. Moscow, Al’pina Non-Fikshn Publ., 2015, 328 p. (in Russ.).
5. Sarianidi V.I. Nekropol’ Gonura i iranskoe yazychestvo [Gonur Necropolis and Iranian Paganism]. Moscow, Mir-Media Publ., 2001, 246 p.
6. Kaufman S.A., Rozentuller P.B. Funerary Structures, Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury: v 12 t. T. 2. Arkhitektura antichnogo mira (Gretsiya i Rim) [General History of Architecture: in 12 volumes. Volume 2. The Architecture of the Ancient World (Greece and Rome)], Stroiizdat Publ., 1973, part 2, pp. 404—413 (in Russ.).
7. Sedov V.V. Dregoviches, Vostochnye slavyane v VI—XIII vv. [Eastern Slavs in the 6th—13th Centuries]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982, pp. 113—119 (in Russ.).
8. Mikhailova M.B. Funerary Structures, Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury: v 12 t. T. 2. Arkhitektura antichnogo mira (Gretsiya i Rim) [General History of Architecture: in 12 volumes. Volume 2. The Architecture of the Ancient World (Greece and Rome)], Stroiizdat Publ., 1973, part 2, pp. 477—478 (in Russ.).
9. Mikhailova M.B. Funerary Structures, Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury: v 12 t. T. 2. Arkhitektura antichnogo mira (Gretsiya i Rim) [General History of Architecture: in 12 volumes. Volume 2. The Architecture of the Ancient World (Greece and Rome)], Stroiizdat Publ., 1973, part 2, pp. 643—661 (in Russ.).
10. Markuzon V.F. Asia Minor Structures, Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury: v 12 t. T. 2. Arkhitektura antichnogo mira (Gretsiya i Rim) [General History of Architecture: in 12 volumes. Volume 2. The Architecture of the Ancient World (Greece and Rome)], Stroiizdat Publ., 1973, part 1, pp. 283—290 (in Russ.).
11. Mikhailova M.B. Forums, Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury: v 12 t. T. 2. Arkhitektura antichnogo mira (Gretsiya i Rim) [General History of Architecture: in 12 volumes. Volume 2. The Architecture of the Ancient World (Greece and Rome)], Stroiizdat Publ., 1973, part 2, pp. 510—522 (in Russ.).
12. Sventsitskaya Yu.S. The Emperor Cult in the Roman Empire: From the Personal Deification to the Formal Cult of the Bearer of Power, Sakralizatsiya vlasti v istorii tsivilizatsii [Sacralisation of Power in the History of Civilizations]. Moscow, Institut Afriki: Tsentr Tsivilizatsionnykh i Regional’nykh Issledovanii Publ., 2005, pp. 237—254 (in Russ.).
13. Pugachenkova G.A., Rempel L.I. Istoriya iskusstv Uzbekistana s drevneishikh vremen do serediny devyatnadtsatogo veka [The History of Art of Uzbekistan from Ancient Times to the Mid-Nineteenth Century], 688 p.
14. Tondi Akhmad. Arkhitekturnyi dekor Srednei Azii epokhi Timuridov [Architectural Decor of Central Asia of the Timurid Era], cand. art. diss.: 17.00.04. Moscow, 2003, 205 p.
15. The Holy Relics of Euphrosyne of Polotsk, Monastyr’ u tserkvi Spasa: sait Polotskogo Svyato-Evfrosinievskogo monastyrya [A Monastery at the Church of the Savior: website of the Polotsk St. Euphrosyne Monastery]. Available at: http://spas-monastery.by/shrines_of_the_monastery/holy_relics/ (accessed 23.10.2020) (in Russ.).
16. Labadenka G. History of the Church, Prikhod “Bozh’ego Tela” v g. Nesvizhe [Parish of “Corpus Christi” in Niasvizh]. Available at: http://
17. niasvizh-kasciol.by/index.php/istoriya (accessed 23.10.2020) (in Russ.).
18. Kolesnikov A. Unbearable Franco: The War of Memory Continues, Moskovskii tsentr Karnegi [Carnegie Moscow Center]. Available at: https://carnegie.ru/2019/10/29/ru-pub-80208 (accessed 23.10.2020) (in Russ.).
19. Markuzon V.F. Greece (480—400 BC), Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury: v 12 t. T. 2. Arkhitektura antichnogo mira (Gretsiya i Rim) [General History of Architecture: in 12 volumes. Volume 2. The Architecture of the Ancient World (Greece and Rome)], Stroiizdat Publ., 1973, part 1, pp. 131—135 (in Russ.).
20. Partsch S. Domashnii muzei [Home Museum]. Moscow, Terra Publ., 1999, 368 p. Available at: https://coollib.com/b/289263/read (accessed 23.10. 2020).
21. Glazychev V.L. Monuments, Urbanistika [Urbanistics]. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 2008, pp. 189—204 (in Russ.).
22. Drugomilov R.A. The Second Period — 9th—13th Centuries. The Territory of Belarus as Part of the Western Lands of the Old Russian State and during the Feudal Fragmentation, Blagoustroistvo territorii. Istoricheskoe razvitie arkhitekturnogo blagoustroistva sel’skikh poselenii Belarusi: posobie [Landscaping. The Historical Development of Architectural Improvement of Rural Settlements of Belarus: tutorial]. Gorki, Belorusskaya Gosudarstvennaya Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Akademiya Publ., 2017, pp. 10—12 (in Russ.).
23. Kolyagina N.K. Bureaucrats, Patriots, Outsiders: Strategies for Interacting with New Russian Monuments, Istoricheskaya razmetka prostranstva i vremeni: materialy seminara, provedennogo Volgogradskim gosudarstvennym universitetom pri podderzhke Fonda F. Eberta 13 maya 2014 g. [Historical Marking of Space and Time: Proceedings of the Seminar Held by the Volgograd State University with the Support of the F. Ebert Foundation on May 13, 2014]. Volgograd, Volgogradskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet Publ., 2014, pp. 89—112 (in Russ.).
24. Timofeev M.Yu. Natsiosfera: opyt analiza semiosfery natsii [Natiosphere: An Experience in Analyzing the Semiosphere of Nations]. Ivanovo, Ivanovskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet Publ., 2005, 277 p.
25. Winter J., Nicolai F.V. Places of Memory and the Shadow of War, Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Minin University], 2016, no. 1—2 (14). Available at: https://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/jour/article/view/163/164# (accessed 23.10.2020) (in Russ.).
26. Miller A., Kasyanov G. Russia: Power and History, Rossiya — Ukraina: kak pishetsya istoriya: dialogi, lektsii, stat’i [Russia — Ukraine: How History is Written: Dialogues, Lectures, Articles]. Moscow, Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennyi Gumanitarnyi Universitet Publ., 2011, pp. 12—38 (in Russ.).
27. Pyrlik G. “Parents’ Tomb”. How Kyrgyzstan Gathered in One Place the Memory of National Tragedies of a Century, Nasha gistoryya [Our History], 2020, no. 4 (21), pp. 47—49 (in Bel.).
- The desire for immortality and the idea of eternal glory, which originated in the culture of ancient civilizations, are interpreted in subsequent eras in numerous monumental forms.
- The nature of the culture of perpetuation is determined by socio-cultural conditions, primarily religious traditions and state priorities.
- The practice of perpetuation acquires special significance during the formation of nations, when a national idea is embodied and transmitted in a monument.
- Modern political regimes, creating memorable places, erecting monuments, establish the norms of the relationship between mass consciousness and state ideology.
- The actualization of disputes and disagreements around the monuments indicates a change in the symbolic foundations of society.
Review
For citations:
Sokolova O.M. Formation and Development Determinants of the City Commemorative Culture. Observatory of Culture. 2021;18(2):127-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2021-18-2-127-139