Culture, Humanitarian Knowledge and Self-Organization Theory

In the 1950s, Charles Snow wrote about the growing gap between the humanities and natural science cultures. He saw this as a great danger both for science itself and for all humankind. In Russia, it was complemented by a crisis of humanitarian knowledge. The article considers the ways to overcome this crisis and build a bridge between cultures.

The solution of these problems is associated with the development of interdisciplinary approaches in general, and the theory of self-organization in particular. Synergetics today represents an approach that lies at the intersection of subject knowledge, philosophical reflection and mathematical modeling. It allows you to solve problems that go beyond individual scientific disciplines. Many of them require an analysis of processes and factors in rational, emotional and intuitive spaces.

The article shows that the ongoing humanitarian and technological revolution, the tasks of designing the future, increase the role of humanitarian knowledge. The author substantiates the importance of a civilizational approach to humanitarian culture and considers the cultural issues of the unique civilization of Russia. There is outlined a number of specific steps to overcome the crisis of Russian humanitarian knowledge.

The concept of cultural challenge is of particular importance among the problems for which solutions are proposed. The transition from the industrial to the post-industrial phase of the civilization development and the widespread use of artificial intelligence systems will free from work about half of people. The social stability and prospects for the civilization development are determined by the ability of culture to make their life complete, meaningful and creative. The use of interdisciplinary approaches in the education system of Russia is of fundamental importance in the course of the humanitarian and technological revolution. The organizational and financial reforms of the last thirty years have led education to a deep crisis. The interdisciplinary approaches are needed in order to balance the wishes of the programs authors, the opportunities of students and to correlate the training received with the prospects for the country’s development. The revision of the content and forms of education today is becoming a problem not only for teachers and scientists, but also for the entire national culture.

The imperative of our country’s cultural development is the image of the future. In the industrial era, there was an idea of universality of the ways of social systems development. In the postindustrial reality, the world becomes more complex, diversity increases. At the current point of bifurcation, several development paths open up. A civilization’s cultural choice, based on tradition, scientific forecasting and the image of the future, becomes fundamental. Interdisciplinary approaches can play a fundamental role in shaping such a cultural choice.

1. Snow C.P. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985, pp. 195—226 (in Russ.).

2. Stepin V.S. Person. Activity. Culture. St. Petersburg, 2019, 800 p. (in Russ.).

3. Feynman R., Leighton R., Sands M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Mainly Mechanics, Radiation, and Heat. Moscow, 2019, vol. 1, 478 p. (in Russ.).

4. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On Approval of Priority Directions for the Development of Science, Technology and Technics in the Russian Federation Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2011, no. 28, art. 4168 (in Russ.).

5. Pereslegin S., Pereslegina E. The Wild Cards of the Future: Force Majeure for Humanity. Moscow, 2015, 480 p. (in Russ.).

6. Borges J.L. The Writing of the God. Moscow, 1992, 510 p. (in Russ.).

7. Eco U. The Name of the Rose. Moscow, 2011, 672 p. (in Russ.).

8. Komenský J.A. The Great Didactic, Pedagogical Heritage. Moscow, 1989, pp. 11—106 (in Russ.).

9. Maurois A. Byron. Letters to a Stranger. An Open Letter to a Young Man about the Science of Living. Moscow, 1998, 667 p. (in Russ.).

10. Girenok F., Kuznetsov V., Ermolaev M. Russian Philosophy of the 21st Century. Maxims: monograph. Moscow, 2014, 319 p. (in Russ.).

11. Khaustov D.S. Lectures on Postmodern Philosophy. Moscow, 2018, 288 p. (in Russ.).

12. Wiener N. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983, 344 p. (in Russ.).

13. Malinetsky G.G. The Space of Synergetics: A View from a Height. Moscow, 2013, 248 p. (in Russ.).

14. Marx K. Theses on Feuerbach, Essays. Moscow, 1955, vol. 3, pp. 1—4 (in Russ.).

15. Chernavsky D.S. Synergetics and Information. Dynamic Information Theory. Moscow, 2017, 304 p. (in Russ.).

16. Hegel G.W.F. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Volume 1. The Science of Logic. Moscow, 1974, 452 p. (in Russ.).

17. Zhuravleva Z.E. (ed.)I Need to Be: In Memory of Sergei Pavlovich Kurdyumov. Moscow, 2010, 480 p. (in Russ.).

18. Bell D. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Moscow, 1999, 956 p. (in Russ.).

19. Ivanov V.V. Global Humanitarian and Technological Revolution: Background and Perspectives, Innovatsii [Innovations], 2017, no. 6 (224), pp. 3—8 (in Russ.).

20. Ivanov V.V., Malinetsky G.G. Russia: 21st Century. Breakthrough Strategy: Technologies. Education. Science. Moscow, 2017, 304 p. (in Russ.).

21. Belkina G.L., Frolova M.I. (eds.) Human Institute: Idea and Reality. Moscow, 2018, 348 p. (in Russ.).

22. Rumyantseva N.L. Social Evolution of Man. System-Dialectical Approach. Moscow, 2014, 240 p. (in Russ.).

23. Lepsky V.E. Reflexive-Active Environments of Innovative Development. Moscow, 2010, 255 p. (in Russ.).

24. Malinetsky G.G., Potapov A.B., Podlazov A.V. Nonlinear Dynamics. Approaches, Results, Hopes. Moscow, 2016, 280 p. (in Russ.).

25. Von Weizsäker E.U., Wijkman A. Come On! Capitalism. Short-Termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet: A Report to the Club of the Rome. New York, Springer Science + Business Media LLC Publ., 2018, 220 p.

26. Wallerstein I. After Liberalism. Moscow, 2003, 256 p. (in Russ.).

27. Dostoevsky F.M. The Writer’s Diary, F.M. Dostoevsky. An Anthology of his Life and Work. Available at: https://

28. fedordostoevsky.ru/works/diary/1876/12/03/ (accessed 08.06.2021) (in Russ.).

29. Solovyov V.S. The Meaning of Love, Orthodox Electronic Library of the Odintsovo Deanery. Available at: http://www.odinblago.ru/soloviev_7/1 (accessed 08.06.2021) (in Russ.).

30. Berdyaev N.A. The Religion of Resurrection (N.F. Fyodorov’s “Philosophy of the Common Cause”), Library (Online Publishing House) magister.msk. Available at: http://magister.msk.ru/library/philos/berdyaev/berdn024.htm (accessed 08.06.2021) (in Russ.).

31. Lem S. Literature and Philosophy, or “I Wanted to Save the World”, The Fourth Lem Readings: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation in Memory of Stanislav Lem. Samara, 2018, pp. 279—287 (in Russ.).

32. Gromyko Yu.V., Krupnova Yu.V. (eds.) Russia Is the Noah’s Ark of Humanity: Philosophical-Religious and Methodological Aspects of the State Ideology of the Future Russia. Moscow, 2019, 208 p. (in Russ.).

33. Bern E. Games People Play: The Psychology of Human Relationships. St. Petersburg, 1992, 400 p. (in Russ.).