Theatrical and Non-Theatrical Thinking in Actual Choreographic Practice

The article attempts to concretize the essence of the two aesthetically polar staging approaches — theatrical and non-theatrical (performative) — in the context of the choreographic art development. The author suggests that the basis for separating these approaches can be some peculiarities in the ways they interpret such fundamental concepts as “actor”, “role”, “spectator”, “drama”, “action”, “conflict”, which, in a choreographic performance, are in certain relationships determined by cultural traditions, and in a non-theatrical production, they are transformed up to their disappearance. A similar experience of separating a theater and a non-theater on the basis of the presence of an actor, a role, a spectator and an hierarchy between them is proposed in theater studies. However, in choreographic (including ballet) performances, the content of the role is closely linked with the music and is often determined by the emotional background and musical dramaturgy. In the case of a radical departure from the composer’s intention, turning to a different starting point for the composition, the specificity of the choreographic (ballet) performance is destroyed. Borrowings from non-theatrical art are showed in the construction of meanings when working with intrinsic body movement, as well as in the reliance on interdisciplinarity. Within a single line of choreographic art, there is a whole spectrum of ideas that interpret the concepts of “theatricality”, “non-theatricality”, “drama”, and “performativity” in different ways. On what basis to classify them in order to reduce them to a consistent system is a difficult question. The article attempts to outline the foundation for future classification. The relevance of this topic is caused by the insufficient elaboration of the conceptual base in the specialized literature on choreographic art.

1. Picon-Vallin B. On Pre-Direction and the New Creative Function of the Director, Voprosy teatra [Problems of the Theatre], 2010, no. 1—2, pp. 271—273 (in Russ.).

2. Blok L.D. Klassicheskii tanets. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [Classical Dance: History and Modernity]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1987, 556 p.

3. Lukutina T.V. New Dance at the Turn of the 19th—20th Centuries: From the Theory of Expressive Gesture to the Practice of Free Dance, Sovremennyi tanets: diskurs i praktiki [Contemporary Dance: Discourse and Practices], 2017, pp. 58—72 (in Russ.).

4. Uvarova G.A. The Eurythmics of E. Jaques-Dalcroze in Theatre Context, Teatr. Zhivopis’. Kino. Muzyka [Theatre. Painting. Movie. Music], 2014, no. 3, pp. 176—201 (in Russ.).

5. Sirotkina I.E. Dance as a Practical Philosophy: The Categories “Natural” and “Artificial” in Dance, Novye rossiiskie gumanitarnye issledovaniya [New Russian Humanities Research], 2009, no. 4, p. 8 (in Russ.).

6. Novik Yu.O. (ed.) Sovremennyi khoreograficheskii diskurs [Contemporary Choreographic Discourse]. St. Petersburg, Akademiya Russkogo Baleta im. A.Ya. Vaganovoi Publ., 2019, 302 p.

7. Chernova N.Yu. Panorama of Dance, Teatr [Theatre], 1977, no. 6, pp. 97—109 (in Russ.).

8. Brook P. The Empty Space. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1976, 239 p. (in Russ.).

9. Aristotle. Etika. Politika. Ritorika. Poetika. Kategorii [Ethics. Politics. Rhetoric. Poetics. Categories]. Minsk, Literatura Publ., 1998, 1391 p.

10. Bentley E. The Life of the Drama. Moscow, Airis-Press Publ., 2004, 405 p. (in Russ.).

11. Pavis P. Slovar’ teatra [Dictionary of the theatre]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1991, 480 p.

12. Barboi Yu.M. K teorii teatra [On the Theory of Theater]. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskaya Gosudarstvennaya Akademiya Teatral’nogo Iskusstva Publ., 2008, 237 p.

13. Kirpichenkova O.V. The Term of “Interpretation” in Ballet Theory and the Criterion of Artistic Value of Choreographic Interpretation, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2017, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 46—53 (in Russ.).

14. Barboi Yu.M. About Criteria of Performance Typologization, Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin], 2015, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7—15 (in Russ.).

15. Banes S. Terpsichore in Sneakers: Post-Modern Dance. Moscow, Artguide Editions Publ., 2018, 311 p. (in Russ.).

16. Menshikov L.A. The Mrt Manifestos in the 1960th Years: The Fluxus Program and its Author, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 15: Iskusstvovedenie [Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg University. Series 15: Arts], 2014, no. 1, pp. 107—116 (in Russ.).

17. Moroz O.V. A Contemporary Art as an Art Documentation: Entertainment or Pure Activity? Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2014, no. 6, pp. 36—42 (in Russ.).

18. Nemchenko L. Contemporary Art Practices: Recoding Public Spaces, Topografii populyarnoi kul’tury: sbornik statei [Topographies of Popular Culture: collected articles]. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2015, pp. 339—355. Available at: https://pub.wikireading.ru/162687 (accessed 26.11.2020) (in Russ.).

19. Barabash N.A. Televidenie i teatr: igry postmodernizma [Television and Theater: Games of Postmodernism]. Moscow, Moskovskii Pedagogicheskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet Publ., 2003, 181 p.

20. Saraf M.Ya. Rhizome Formation in Cultural Space as an Indicator of its State of Crisis, Prostranstvo i Vremya [Space and Time], 2014, no. 1 (15), pp. 74—77 (in Russ.).