The Formation of the Concept of Freedom in the Ancient Period
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2022-19-4-439-447
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the formation dynamics of the concept of freedom in the antique philosophic tradition. The author examines the conceptualization of the term of freedom in the context of the emerging subjectivity paradigm together with the terms like guilt, legitimacy, pursuit, spontaneity, determinism, will and mind. The article claims that the shift from the archaic understanding of freedom as a generic feature of ethnic identity and liberation from external compulsion to the interpretation of freedom as a subject’s ability to set goals and self-identify is a result of redefining the connection between such terms as will and mind. There are described the changes in social practices that came from redefining of the above-mentioned terms. The author examines the connection between the classical tradition and the early Christian discourse that set the freedom of will as the highest ontological principle determining the ethical modality of a subject. The late antique Christian discourse links the concept of freedom with the will of a subject. However, unlike the classical tradition, the freedom is not defined through rationality (freedom as a conscious decision leading to a desired goal), but is shifted to the sphere of affect (emotional resonance with the doctrinal provisions of Christianity, whose aim is to merge with the Creator), which set the basis for voluntarist theories. The article argues that the intention of the concept of freedom formed within the antique tradition is relevant to the modern discussions of human freedom, defined in terms of opposition to natural determinism, lack of external compulsion and manipulations, rational goal-setting, opportunity to act differently, subject’s control over the alternative choices, expression of subject’s psychological life.
About the Author
Vladimir V. BabichRussian Federation
60, Kievskaya Str., Tomsk, 634061, Russia
ORCID 0000-0001-8537-9782; SPIN 1277-7431
References
1. Minchenko T.P. On the Issue of Understanding Freedom and Love in the Culture of Hellenism, Influence of Hellenism on Science, Culture and Education of our Time: collective monograph. Tomsk, 2016, pp. 78—88 (in Russ.).
2. Herodotus. History. In 9 Books. Leningrad, 1972, 600 p. (in Russ.).
3. Aeschylus. Tragedies. Moscow, 1971, 384 p. (in Russ.).
4. Euripides. Tragedies. In 2 Volumes. Moscow, 1969, vol. 2, 719 p. (in Russ.).
5. Aristotle. Collected Works in 4 Volumes. Moscow, 1983, vol. 4, 830 p. (in Russ.).
6. Avanesov S.S. Axiological Motives in Homer (2), Schole. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, 2012, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 283—305 (in Russ.).
7. Macintyre A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Moscow, 2000, 384 p. (in Russ.).
8. Homer. Iliad. Moscow, 1960, 435 p. (in Russ.).
9. Hesiod. Works and Days. Moscow, 2001, 256 p. (in Russ.).
10. Stolyarov A.A. Free Will as a Problem of European Moral Consciousness. Moscow, 1999, 206 p. (in Russ.).
11. Sophocles. Tragedies. Moscow, 1988, 496 p. (in Russ.).
12. Verlinsky A.L. Hippias, Ancient Philosophy: Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow, 2008, pp. 273—275 (in Russ.).
13. Plato. Collected Works. In 4 Volumes. Moscow, 1990, vol. 1, 860 p. (in Russ.).
14. Volf M.N. Sophistry. Gorgias of Lentini: “On Not-Being or On Nature” Treatise in Modern Interpretations. Novosibirsk, 2014, 249 p. (in Russ.).
15. Lurye S.Ya. Democritus. Texts. Translations. Research. Leningrad, 1970, 664 p. (in Russ.).
16. Goran V.P. Necessity and Chance in the Philosophy of Democritus. Novosibirsk, 1984, 208 p. (in Russ.).
17. Lucretius. On the Nature of Things. Moscow, 1983, 383 p. (in Russ.).
18. Goran V.P. Lucretius Carus: Rational Determinism vs Irrational Indeterminism, Schole. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, 2014, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 328—338 (in Russ.).
19. Plato. Collected Works. In 4 Volumes. Moscow, 1994, vol. 3, 830 p. (in Russ.).
20. Aristotle. Collected Works. In 4 Volumes. Moscow, 1976, vol. 1, 549 p. (in Russ.).
21. Mitrouchev I. Back to Aristotle? Explorations of Objective Happiness, HAL. Working Papers, 2020, no. hal-02915805. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02915805 (accessed 18.08.2022).
22. Diogenes Laertius. Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers. Moscow, 1986, 571 p. (in Russ.).
23. Aulus Gellius. Attic Nights. Books I—X. St. Petersburg, 2007, 480 p. (in Russ.).
24. Fragments of the Early Stoics. Moscow, 2002, vol. 2, part 2, 272 p. (in Russ.).
25. Seneca L.A. Moral Letters to Lucilius. Tragedies. Moscow, 1986, 543 p. (in Russ.).
26. Cicero. Philosophical Treatises. Moscow, 1985, 382 p. (in Russ.).
27. Origen. On the First Principles. Against Celsus. St. Petersburg, 2008, 792 p. (in Russ.).
28. Tertullian. Selected Works. Moscow, 1994, 448 p. (in Russ.).
29. Augustine of Hippo. On True Religion. A Theological Treatise. Moscow, 1999, 1600 p. (in Russ.).
30. Augustine of Hippo. On Free Choice of the Will, An Anthology of Medieval Thought. In 2 Volumes. St. Petersburg, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 25—66 (in Russ.).
31. Augustine of Hippo. Creations: In 4 Volumes. Volume 3: On the City of God, book I—XIII. St. Petersburg, 1998, 595 p. (in Russ.).
32. Augustine of Hippo. Creations: In 4 Volumes. Volume 4: On the City of God, book XIV—XXII. St. Petersburg, 1998, 595 p. (in Russ.).
33. Cobb L.S. Heirs of Roman Prosecution. Studies on a Christian and Para-Christian Discourse in Late Antiquity ed. by Éric Fournier and Wendy Mayer (Review), Journal of Late Antiquity, 2021, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 159—161. DOI: 10.1353/jla.2021.0009.
34. Augustine of Hippo. Treatises on Various Subjects. Moscow, 2005, 352 p. (in Russ.).
35. Mercer J. Augustine’s Conversion from Traditional Free Choice to “Non-free Free Will” by Kenneth M. Wilson (review), Journal of Early Christian Studies, 2020, vol. 28, 1, pp. 155—157. DOI: 10.1353/earl.2020.0008.
36. Augustine of Hippo. On the Trinity: In Fifteen Books against the Arians. Krasnodar, 2004, 416 p. (in Russ.).
37. Zavyalova G.I. Human Freedom and Civil Society: Interaction Aspects, Alleya nauki [Alley of Science], 2016, no. 3 (3), pp. 223—229 (in Russ.).
38. Kot Ya.I. Freedom as a Universal of Culture in an Information Society, Gumanitarnyi vestnik MGTU im. Baumana [Humanities Bulletin of BMSTU], 2019, no. 3 (77), 16 p. DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2019-3-603 (in Russ.).
39. Stepanova E.A., Penner R.V. Women’s Freedom in Modern Socio-Cultural Discourse: The Problem of Measuring Symbolic Violence in Advertising, Homo holistic: chelovek tselostnyi [Homo Holistic: Holistic Person]. Chelyabinsk, 2018, issue 6, pp. 129—135 (in Russ.).
40. Melik-Gaikazyan I.V. Bioethics and Semiotics: Instead of a Foreword, Praksema. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki [Praxema. Journal of Visual Semiotics], 2021, no. 3 (29), pp. 9—18. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2021-3-9-18 (in Russ.).
- Freedom is seen as an anthropological universal that defines the understanding of the code as a traditional philosophical problem.
- The concept of freedom is the foundation of entire topoi of culture: religion, ethics, law, contemporary studies of personality and gender.
- In the ancient tradition, the formation of the philosophical concept of freedom took place, the content of which remains relevant today in the course of understanding modern anthropological theories.
Review
For citations:
Babich V.V. The Formation of the Concept of Freedom in the Ancient Period. Observatory of Culture. 2022;19(4):439-447. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2022-19-4-439-447