The Specifics of the Director’s Work with a Central Figure in Film and TV Documentaries

The topic of the director’s work with a documentary’s central figure on the screen, in the conditions of active distribution of visual content, especially in the genre of interviews, is undoubtedly relevant. The interviewee’s preparation for filming, the methods of their emancipation, the achievement of the ultimate goal and the truth of life on the screen require detailed study, professional knowledge based on the experience of the classics of documentary film directing — D. Lunkov, Yu. Shiller, I. Belyaev, A. Lysenko, etc. Long-forgotten techniques are closely intertwined with innovative ideas of directors. These include what behavior the interviewer or presenter decides to adhere to. Depending on the combination of factors, the tone and course of on-screen conversation in different genres may change. By adopting a tough model of behavior, the presenter can make the conversation’s tone tense and, at the same time, more dynamic and sharp, while a soft behavioral model can make the conversation more sincere and friendly. The article analyzes the specifics of the director’s work with a central figure in the process of creating documentary screen works. The authors attempt to comprehend the experience of previous generations of documentary filmmakers, so that young specialists can take into account their mistakes and achieved results when working with the so-called non-actor — a documentary’s central figure in the audiovisual screen space. The article concludes that, despite the fact that the solutions to complex problems in the work of a director with a documentary’s central figure have already been described by leading practitioners and theorists in the field of audiovisual screen arts, the process of forming a central figure in film and television documentaries is not over. There are controversial points of view on a number of aspects of disclosing the personality of a documentary’s central figure, their emancipation on camera and the truth of life on the screen. Therefore, relying on the previous experience of the professionals and taking into account the emergence of new technologies, the younger generation of directors needs to use already well-proven techniques in their work, as well as try to find and apply new approaches (techniques) when creating documentary screen works having a central figure.

1. Lunkov D. Naedine s sovremennikom [Alone with a Contemporary]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1978, 175 p.

2. Mitta A. Kino mezhdu adom i raem [Cinema between Heaven and Hell]. Moscow, Podkova Publ., 1999, 650 p.

3. Belova L.I. Skvoz’ vremya. Ocherki istorii sovetskoi kinodramaturgii [Through the Time. Essays on the History of Soviet Screenwriting]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1978, 344 p.

4. Field S. Screenplay: The Foundations of Screenwriting. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2016, 384 p. (in Russ.).

5. Osnovy rezhissury mul’timedia-programm: uchebnoe posobie [The Foundations of Directing Multimedia Programs: textbook]. St. Petersburg, SPbGUP Publ., 2005, 304 p.

6. Grebnev A.B. Zapiski poslednego stsenarista: tsikl “O vremeni i o sebe” [Notes by the Last Screenwriter “About Time and about Myself”]. Moscow, Algoritm Publ., 2000, 368 p.

7. Romm M.I. Besedy o kinorezhissure [Conversations about Filmmaking]. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2022, 475 p.

8. Belyaev I. The Dramatism of Life and the View of a Documentary Filmmaker, Otkroveniya televideniya [Revelations of Television]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1976, pp. 40—43 (in Russ.).

9. Lysenko A. The Main Character, Dokumental’nyi videofil’m [Documentary Video Film]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1982, pp. 57—71 (in Russ.).

10. Shiller Yu. Subjectivity of an Objective Film, Televidenie vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Television: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1988, pp. 103—126 (in Russ.).

11. Shesterkina L.P., Nikolaeva T.D. Metodika televizionnoi zhurnalistiki: uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vuzov [Methods of Television Journalism: textbook]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2012, 223 p.

12. Kuznetsova G.V., Tsvik V.L., Yurovsky A.Ya. (eds.) Televizionnaya zhurnalistika: uchebnik [Television Journalism: textbook]. Moscow, Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 2002, 304 p.

13. Drobyshenko S.V. Ekran i zhizn’ [Screen and Life]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1962, pp. 188—213.

14. Gavrilyuk P.I. Zhanry televizionnoi zhurnalistiki: uchebnoe posobie [Genres of Television Journalism: textbook]. St. Petersburg, SPbGATI Publ., 2008, 100 p.

15. McKee R. Story: Substance, Structure, Style, and the Principles of Screenwriting. Moscow, Alpina Non-Fikshn Publ., 2010, 456 p. (in Russ.).

16. Arnheim R. Iskusstvo i vizual’noe vospriyatie [Art and Visual Perception]. Moscow, Arkhitektura-S Publ., 2013, 392 p.

17. Sappak B.C. Televidenie i my. Chetyre besedy [Television and We. Four Conversations]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2007, 168 p.

18. Egri L. Iskusstvo dramaturgii [The Art of Dramatic Writing]. Moscow, Zebra E Publ., 2007, 357 p.

19. Pronin A. Kak napisat’ khoroshii stsenarii [How to Write a Good Script]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika Publ., 2009, 288 p.

20. Glushchenko V., Derevitsky V., Teterin V. Dialogi o televidenii [Conversations about Television]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1974, 184 p.

21. Yurovsky A. Beware, the Document! Otkroveniya televideniya [Revelations of Television]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1976, pp. 84—90 (in Russ.).