Philosophical Analysis of Choreographic Language: The Nature and Specificity of Dance Expressiveness

Productive analysis of the language of choreographic art in order to determine the specifics of dance expressiveness requires the solution of three main tasks. Firstly, to explain the mechanism of functioning of the kinetic language; secondly, to highlight the expressive possibilities of dance, mime and plasticity; thirdly, to understand the ontological foundations of human motor activity in dance. It is not possible to solve the set tasks within the framework of cultural or semiotic approaches only. In this way, the phenomenon of dance is interpreted according to its representation in artistic culture, in the context of its functioning in the process of semiosis, and dance movements are initially endowed with communicative properties. The solution of the set tasks was carried out at the level of philosophical reflection. It was determined that a human being, as a result of the association of ideas and impressions in his consciousness, is peculiar to endow all objects and phenomena of reality perceived by him with meaning. Thus, the association of ideas and impressions in the human consciousness is the functional basis of kinetic language. But absolutely any manifestation of human motor activity can be endowed with meaning in a similar way. That is why dance, pantomime and plasticity — three related expressive means using human body movements as a material — were singled out in the kinetic language. Since it is impossible to understand the nature of dance movements on the basis of their external features, a hypothesis was proposed according to which these features themselves are conditioned by the inner state of mind of the dancer. Dance was defined as a type of human motor activity genetically connected with the “affect of joy” and aimed at maintaining and preserving its action. The conclusion is made: the specificity of dance expressiveness lies in the translation of a unique human state of mind, which is characterized by the feeling of unity of the rise of the body’s vitality and the increased ability of the soul to feel and perceive life in its fullness.

1. Zakharov R.V. Sochinenie tantsa: Stranitsy pedagogicheskogo opyta [Composition of Dance: Pages of Pedagogical Experience]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1989, 235 p.

2. Gerasimova I.A. Dance: Evolution of Kinesthetic Creativity, Ehvolyutsiya. Yazyk. Poznanie [Evolution. Language. Cognition]. Moscow, Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury Publ., 2000, pp. 84—112 (in Russ.).

3. Noverre J.G. Letters on Dancing and Ballet. St. Petersburg, Lan’ Publ., 2007, 382 p. (in Russ.).

4. Dunkan A. Tanets budushchego [Dance of the Future]. Moscow, Zarya Publ., 1908, 31 p.

5. Fokin M.M. Protiv techeniya: vospominaniya baletmeistera. Stsenarii i zamysly baletov. Stat’i, interv’yu i pis’ma [Against the Tide: Memoirs of a Choreographer. Scripts and Designs for Ballets. Articles, Interviews and Letters]. Leningrad, Iskusstvo Publ., Leningradskoe Otd-nie, 1981, 510 p.

6. Lopukhov F.V. Khoreograficheskie otkrovennosti [Choreographic Revelations]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1972, 215 p.

7. Goleizovsky K.Ya. Obrazy russkoi narodnoi khoreografii [Samples of Russian Folk Choreography]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1964, 368 p.

8. Bejart M. Mgnovenie v zhizni drugogo: memuary [Moment in the Life of Another: memoirs]. Moscow, V/O Soyuzteatr Publ., 1989, 237 p.

9. Lucian. Sochineniya: v 2 t. T. 2 [Works: in 2 volumes. Vol. 2]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2001, 536 p.

10. Plato. The Laws. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1999, 830 p. (in Russ.).

11. Jaques-Dalcroze E. Rhythm. Moscow, Klassika-XXI Publ., 2001, 248 p. (in Russ.).

12. Gauthier B. François Delsarte et le jeu classique de l’acteur, L’Annuaire théâtral, 2011, no. 49, pp. 175—187. Available at: https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/annuaire/2011-n49-annuaire0114/1009310ar.pdf (accessed 12.02.2024).

13. Laban R. The Mastery of Movement. London, Macdonald & Evans Publ., 1971, 186 p. Available at: https://archive.org/details/masteryofmovemen0000laba/mode/2up (accessed 12.02.2024).

14. Langer S. Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite and Art. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2000, 286 p. (in Russ,).

15. Schlemmer O. Briefe und Tagebücher. München, 1958, 217 p.

16. Khudekov S.N. Vseobshchaya istoriya tantsa [General History of Dance]. Moscow, Ehksmo Publ., 2009, 606 p.

17. Blok L.D. Klassicheskii tanets. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [Classical Dance. History and Modernity]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1987, 556 p.

18. Dobrovolskaya G.N. Tanets. Pantomima. Balet [Dance. Pantomime. Ballet]. Leningrad, Iskusstvo Publ., Leningradskoe Otd-nie, 1975, 125 p.

19. Karp P.M. O balete [About Ballet]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1967, 228 p.

20. Vanslov V.V. Balety Grigorovicha i problemy khoreografii [Grigorovich’s Ballets and Problems of Choreography]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1971, 302 p.

21. Romm V.V. Tanets v ehvolyutsii cheloveka. Issledovanie arkheologicheskikh ob”ektov kul’tury s izobrazheniem tantsa: monografiya [Dance in Human Evolution. The Study of Archaeological Cultural Objects Depicting Dance: monograph]. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publ., 2011, 440 p.

22. Nikitin V.Yu. Masterstvo khoreografa v sovremennom tantse: uchebnoe posobie [Choreographer’s Skills in Modern Dance: textbook]. Moscow, Rossiiskii Institut Teatral’nogo Iskusstva — GITIS Publ., 2011, 469 p.

23. Melanyin A.A. Metody analiza tantseval’nogo dvizheniya [The Methods of Analysing Dance Movement], Cand. art hist. sci. diss. abstr. Moscow, 2010, 24 p.

24. Ryazanova Yu.N. Novye sredstva vyrazitel’nosti v baletnom iskusstve XX veka (k probleme sootnosheniya traditsii i novatorstva) [New Means of Expression in the Ballet Art of the 20th Century (On the Correlation Between Tradition and Innovation)], Cand. art hist. sci. diss. Moscow, 2016, 208 p.

25. Sirotkina I.E. Tanets: opyt ponimaniya: ehsse, znamenitye khoreograficheskie postanovki i performansy, antologiya tekstov o tantse [Dance: The Experience of Understanding: Essays, Famous Choreographic Productions and Performances, an Anthology of Texts About Dance]. Moscow, Boslen Publ., 2020, 253 p.

26. Kirillov A.P. Yazyk tantsa: istoriko-sistemno-semioticheskaya razrabotka i obosnovanie: monografiya [Language of Dance: Historical-System-Semiotic Development and Substantiation: monograph]. Moscow, Moskovskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet Kul’tury i Iskusstva Publ., 2004, 472 p.

27. Zhilenko M.N. Tanets kak forma kommunikatsii v sotsiokul’turnom prostranstve [Dance as a Form of Communication in Socio-Cultural Space], Cand. cult. sci. diss. Moscow, 2000, 191 p.

28. Gevlenko Yu.A. The Semiotic Analysis of Dance, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal], 2009, no. 320, pp. 87—89 (in Russ.).

29. Lugovaya E.K. Filosofiya tantsa [Philosophy of Dance]. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, 2008, 128 p.

30. Vychuzhanova L.K. Yazyk khoreografii: filosofskii analiz [The Language of Choreography: A Philosophical Analysis], Cand. philos. sci. diss. Ufa, 2009, 173 p.

31. Sirotkina I.E. Discrete and Continuous in Dance, Voprosy filosofii, 2016, no. 10, pp. 132—142 (in Russ.).

32. Sirotkina I.E. Dance as a Practical Philosophy: The Categories “Natural” and “Artificial” in Dance, Novye rossiiskie gumanitarnye issledovaniya [New Russian Humanities Research], 2009, no. 4, pp. 8 (in Russ.).

33. Tarasova O.I. Art Time in Space of Dance, Vestnik Akademii russkogo baleta im. A.Ya. Vaganovoi [Bulletin of Vaganova Ballet Academy], 2018, no. 1, pp. 150—157 (in Russ.).

34. Atitanova N.V. Tanets kak smyslovaya universaliya: Ot vyrazitel’nogo dvizheniya k “dvizheniyu” smysla [Dance as a Semantic Universal: From Expressive Movement to the “Movement” of Meaning], Cand. philos. sci. diss. Saransk, 2000, 163 p.

35. Sokolchik A.N. Dancing Body as an Ideal Matter for Expression Thoughts, Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena [Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences], 2011, no. 3, pp. 291—295 (in Russ.).

36. Wittgenstein L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Moscow, Kanon Publ., 2017, 287 p. (in Russ.).

37. Tyutchev F.I. Polnoe sobranie stikhotvorenii [A Complete Collection of Poems]. Leningrad, Sovetskii Pisatel’ Publ., 1987, 446 p.

38. Krylova N.B. Kul’turologiya obrazovaniya [Culturology of Education]. Moscow, Narodnoe Obrazovanie Publ., 2000, 269 p.

39. Matushkina M.V. Dance and Thinking in the German Philosophy of Art of the Late 20th — Early 21st Century, Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development], 2014, no. 7, pp. 17—20 (in Russ.).

40. Banes S. Terpsichore in Sneakers: Post-Modern Dance. Moscow, Artguide Editions Publ., 2018, 311 p. (in Russ.).

41. Pease A., Pease B. Body Language: How to Read Others’ Thoughts by Their Gestures. Moscow, Ehksmo-Press Publ., 2022, 448 p. (in Russ.).

42. Joseph S.H. The Dancer’s Body, a Medical Perspective on Dance and Dance Training. Moscow, Novoe Slovo Publ., 2004, 109 p. (in Russ.).

43. Hume D. Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Works: in 2 volumes]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1996, vol. 1, A Treatise on Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, 736 p.

44. Krysankov T.G. On Problematic Issues of Dance Philosophy: Semiotic and Ontological Aspects of Dance Movements, Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2021, issue 4, pp. 604—612. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-604-612 (in Russ.).

45. Spinoza B. Ethics. Minsk, Kharvest Publ., Moscow, AST Publ., 2001, 336 p. (in Russ.).