About Alexey Khomyakov’s Views on Church Painting
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2024-21-2-170-176
Abstract
The article is devoted to the views on church painting of one of the Slavophile leaders A.S. Khomyakov. In 1845, Alexander Ivanov, an artist working in Rome, influenced by the “Slavophile” atmosphere of meetings with F.V. Chizhov, N.M. Yazykov and N.V. Gogol, attempted to use an icon as a model for the image of the Resurrection of Christ for the Moscow Cathedral of Christ the Saviour (for the first time in the history of the Russian academic school). It is doubtful that Khomyakov could have unreservedly welcomed this endeavor by Ivanov. Although he believed that for Russia’s return to nationality it would be sufficient only to revive the old in consciousness and life, he did not at all understand this return as a revival of the authentic forms of Old Russian art or as a stylization of these forms. Khomyakov’s negative attitude to stylizations is evidenced by his sharp criticism of the eclecticism of Bavarian art. In Russia, he believed, the link with tradition had long been severed and therefore Old Russian art could not serve as a basis for a modern art school. Not in Ivanov’s traditional icon-oriented sketch of the Resurrection of Christ, but in his painting The Appearance of the Messiah, Khomyakov recognized, even before he saw it with his own eyes, evidence of the beginning of the revival of truly Russian life and Russian thought. In his opinion, the artist sought in the painting to eliminate personal artistic manner, to become a kind of transparent medium through which the holy image would be imprinted on the canvas. The German Nazarene artists tried to capture the Christian phenomenon in the artistic contemplation of the spirit, but they could only teach it, they themselves were incapable of it. Ivanov, a graduate of the Imperial Academy of Arts, who had perfectly mastered the craft of an artist, was at the same time, according to Khomyakov, a pupil of icon painters, who created a great work of church wall painting. The history of the Russian art school of the second half of the 19th — early 20th century fully confirmed the validity of this assessment of the painting The Apparition of the Messiah. It laid the foundation for the God-seeking direction of Russian painting, on which Russian art blossomed in the work of I.N. Kramskoi, V.M. Vasnetsov, M.V. Nesterov, N.N. Ge, as well as atheists — V.D. Polenov and V.V. Vereshchagin. Although not all the works of this trend were honored to be accepted into the bosom of the Orthodox Church, most of them allow us to be deservedly proud of the Russian art school.
References
1. Khomyakov A.S. The Letter to Petersburg, A.S. Khomyakov. O starom i novom. Stat’i i ocherki [A.S. Khomyakov. On the Old and the New. Articles and Essays]. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ., 1988, pp. 70—82 (in Russ.).
2. Allenov M.M. Aleksandr Andreevich Ivanov. Moscow, Izobrazitel’noe Iskusstvo Publ., 1980, 208 p. (in Russ.).
3. Maslov K.I. Fyodor Chizhov in Search of the “Image Art”, Dom Burganova. Prostranstvo kul’tury [Space of Culture. Burganov House], Moscow, 2015, no. 2, pp. 59—75 (in Russ.).
4. Fyodor Vasilyevich Chizhov: From a Speech by I.S. Aksakov, Delivered on December 18, 1877, Russkii arkhiv [Russian Archive]. Moscow, 1878, book 1, no. 1, pp. 129—137 (in Russ.).
5. Questions Proposed to Ivan Sergeyevich Aksakov by the 3rd Department, Ivan Sergeevich Aksakov v ego pis’makh [Ivan Sergeyevich Aksakov in His Letters]. Moscow, 1888, part 1, vol. 2, pp. 147—163(in Russ.).
6. Tsimbaev N.I. Moscow Disputes of the Liberal Time, Russkoe obshchestvo 40—50-kh godov XIX v. Ch. I: Zapiski A.I. Kosheleva [The Russian Society of the 40—50s of the 19th Century. Part 1: Notes by A.I. Koshelev]. Moscow, 1991, pp. 5—43 (in Russ.).
7. Bernshtein B.A. Ivanov and Slavophilism, Iskusstvo [Art], Moscow, 1958, no. 3, pp. 58—66 (in Russ.).
8. Vinogradov I.A. (ed.) Aleksandr Ivanov v pis’makh, dokumentakh, vospominaniyakh [Alexander Ivanov in Letters, Documents, Memoirs]. Moscow, Izdatel’skii Dom “XXI vek — Soglasie”, 2001, 776 p.
9. Maslov K.I. In Search of the Lost Tradition: Towards a History of Church Paintings in the 1840s — First Half of the 1850s, Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya V. Voprosy istorii i teorii khristianskogo iskusstva [St. Tikhon’s University Review. Problems of History and Theory of Christian Art], Moscow, 2023, no. 49, pp. 91—120. DOI: 10.15382/sturV202349.91-120 (in Russ.).
10. Khomyakov A.S. On the Possibility of the Russian Art School, A.S Khomyakov. O starom i novom. Stat’i i ocherki [A.S. Khomyakov. On the Old and the New. Articles and Essays]. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ., 1988, pp. 135—159 (in Russ.).
11. Khomyakov A.S. On the Old and the New, A.S Khomyakov. O starom i novom. Stat’i i ocherki [A.S. Khomyakov. On the Old and the New. Articles and Essays]. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ., 1988, pp. 41—56 (in Russ.).
12. Khomyakov A.S. The Letter to St. Petersburg About the Exhibition, A.S Khomyakov. O starom i novom. Stat’i i ocherki [A.S. Khomyakov. On the Old and New. Articles and Essays]. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ., 1988, pp. 56—65 (in Russ.).
13. Khomyakov A.S. Glinka’s Opera “A Life for the Tsar”, A.S Khomyakov. O starom i novom. Stat’i i ocherki [A.S. Khomyakov. On the Old and New. Articles and Essays]. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ., 1988, pp. 65—70 (in Russ.).
14. Popov A.N. Icon Painting, Severnoe obozrenie [The Northern Review]. St. Petersburg, 1849, book 1, no. 2, pp. 489—525 (in Russ.).
15. Archbishop Anatoly. Ob ikonopisanii [On Iconography]. St. Petersburg, Izd. Prot. V. Grechulevich Publ., 1867, 96 p.
16. Snegirev I.M. On the Importance of Domestic Icon Painting: (I.M. Snegirev’s Letters to Count A.S. Uvarov), Zapiski arkheologichesko-numizmaticheskogo obshchestva v Sankt-Peterburge [The Notes of the Archaeological and Numismatic Society in St. Petersburg]. St. Petersburg, 1848, III, pp. 181—210 (in Russ.).
17. Sakharov I.P. Issledovaniya o russkom ikonopisanii. Kn. 1—2 [Researches on Russian Icon Painting. Book 1—2]. St. Petersburg, Tip. Ya. Treya Publ., 1849, book 1, 64 p., book 2, 59 p., supplu, 47 p.
18. Khomyakov A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. V 8 t. Pis’ma [Complete Works. In 8 volumes. The Letters]. Moscow, 1900, vol. 8, 480, 58 p.
19. Khomyakov A.S. Concerning Humboldt, A.S Khomyakov. O starom i novom. Stat’i i ocherki [A.S. Khomyakov. On the Old and the New. Articles and Essays]. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ., 1988, pp. 196—221 (in Russ.).
20. Chizhov F.V. About the Works of Russian Artists in Rome, Moskovskii literaturnyi i uchenyi sbornik [Moscow Literary and Scientific Collection]. Moscow, 1846, pp. 49—136 (in Russ.).
21. Gogol N.V. Historical Painter Ivanov, N.V. Gogol’. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 14 t. [N.V. Gogol. Complete Works: in 14 volumes]. Moscow, Leningrad, Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952, vol. 8, pp. 328—337 (in Russ.).
22. Khomyakov A.S. Ivanov’s Painting, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii Alekseya Stepanovicha Khomyakova [Complete Works by Alexei Stepanovich Khomyakov]. Moscow, 1914, vol. 3, pp. 346—365 (in Russ.).
23. Vakhrina V.I. Amphilochius, Pravoslavnaya ehntsiklopediya [The Orthodox Encyclopedia]. Moscow, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 200—201 (in Russ.).
24. Muravyov A.N. Pis’ma s Vostoka v 1849—1850 godakh: v 2 ch. [The Letters from the East in 1849—1850: in 2 parts]. St. Petersburg, 1851, part 1, 391 p.
25. Kramskoi I.N. Artist A.A. Ivanov and His Significance for Russian Art, Tvorchestvo [Creativity]. 1958, no. 7, pp. 20—22 (in Russ.).
For many years, the Slavophile leader A.S Khomyakov lived in anticipation of the birth of a new Russian art school. He condemned stylizations in the ancient taste, considering them just an empty masquerade, and was not at all sympathic to the sincere defenders of ancient forms, finding in their insistent clinging to the past “something,” as he put it, “ridiculous and even immoral.” Khomyakov’s expectations were justified in 1858, when he met A. Ivanov and saw with his own eyes his painting “The Appearance of the Messiah,” which by that time had already become famous. He recognized in the artist a student of icon painters, who, unlike them, “dared to know how,” and in the painting he saw a premonition of icon painting. The special place in Russian art of Ivanov’s painting, which Khomyakov assigned to it, was subsequently fully confirmed: it marked the beginning of the God-seeking direction of Russian historical painting.
Review
For citations:
Maslov K.I. About Alexey Khomyakov’s Views on Church Painting. Observatory of Culture. 2024;21(2):170-176. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2024-21-2-170-176