

Interdisciplinary Creative Laboratories for “Sustainable” Heritage Actualization
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2025-22-1-65-75
Abstract
Actualization of natural and cultural heritage is considered in an integrated approach: preservation/archiving and presentation through museum institutions (archives), including protected areas, and “transfer” of tangible objects and intangible values into real life to include them in the modern meaningful context. While the preservation and presentation of heritage has an extensive tradition and practice in museology, the methods and approaches of incorporating heritage into the contemporary context are constantly changing and being updated to reflect the current situation. The appeal to contemporary art as a method of heritage interpretation is based on its potential to use various methods, techniques and approaches from different disciplines: artistic research, interdisciplinary approach, etc. The specificity of protected areas in Russia as complex formations that combine multiple practices (scientific, educational, recreational, etc.) opens up the possibility of using a variety of formats for data interpretation, such as creative laboratories that include contemporary artistic research, interdisciplinary and social co-operation, and presentation of research results to a wide audience. As an example of such a laboratory, the study considers international art research projects implemented on the territory of the Divnogorye Museum-Reserve.
About the Author
Yana V. MalinovskayaRussian Federation
20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russia
ORCID 0000-0002-0394-1581; SPIN 5177-1722
References
1. Berg L.S. Geograficheskie zony Sovetskogo Soyuza: v 2 t. [Geography of the Soviet Union: in 2 volumes]. Moscow, Geografgiz Publ., 1947, vol. 1, 397 p.
2. Humboldt A.F. Tsentral’naya Aziya: issledovaniya o tsepyakh gor i po sravnitel’noi klimatologii [Central Asia: Researches on Mountain Chains and Comparative Climatology]. Moscow, Tipo-Litogafiya Tovarishchestva I.N. Kushnerev i Ko Publ., 1915, vol. 1, 350 p.
3. Humboldt A.F. Cosmos: A Sketch of a Physical Description of the Universe: in 5 volumes. St. Petersburg, 1848, vol. 1, 362 p. (in Russ.).
4. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky V.P. Raion i strana [District and Country]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosizdat Publ., 1928, 311 p.
5. Dokuchaev V.V. Russkii chernozem: Otchet Imperatorskomu Vol’nomu ehkonomicheskomu obshchestvu [Russian Black Soil: Report to the Imperial Free Economic Society]. St. Petersburg, Tip. Deklerona i Evdokimova Publ., 1883, 376 p.
6. Dokuchaev V.V. Sochineniya: v 9 t. [Works: in 9 volumes]. Moscow, Izd-vo i 2-ya Tip. Izd-va Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1953, vol. 7, 504 p.
7. Schlüter O. Die Erdkunde in ihrem Verhältnis zu den Natur- und Geisteswissenschaften, Geographische Anzeiger, 1920, no. 21/7, pp. 145—152, no. 21/10, pp. 213—218.
8. Berg L.S. The Subject and Objectives of Geography, Izvestiya Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva [Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society]. Moscow, 1915, vol. 51, issue 9, pp. 463—475 (in Russ.).
9. Vernadsky V.I. Biosfera i noosfera [Biosphere and Noosphere]. Moscow, Airis Press: Rol’f Publ., 2002, 573 p.
10. Isachenko G.A. The Concept of Long-Term Dynamics of Landscape and Challenges of the Time, Voprosy geografii [Problems of Geography], 2014, no. 138, pp. 215—232 (in Russ.).
11. Zamyatin D.N. Gumanitarnaya geografiya: prostranstvo i yazyk geograficheskikh obrazov [Humanitarian Geography: Space and Language of Geographical Images]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2003, 331 p.
12. Zamyatin D.N. Modelirovanie geograficheskikh obrazov. Prostranstvo gumanitarnoi geografii [Modeling of Geographical Images. The Space of Humanitarian Geography]. Smolensk, Oikumena Publ., 1999, 255 p.
13. Vedenin Yu.A. Problems of Forming a Cultural Landscape and Its Study, Izvestiya Akad. Nauk SSSR. Seriya Geograficheskaya, Moscow, 1990, no. 1, pp. 3—17 (in Russ.).
14. Vedenin Yu.A. Experience of Cultural Landscape Description of Large Russian Regions, Kul’turnyi landshaft kak ob”ekt naslediya [Cultural Landscape as a Heritage Object]. Moscow, Institut Naslediya Publ., St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin Publ., 2004, pp. 338—382 (in Russ.).
15. Vedenin Yu.A. Ocherki po geografii iskusstva [Essays on the Geography of Art]. St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin Publ., 1997, 224 p.
16. Kagansky V.L. Landscape and Culture, Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World], 1997, no. 1, pp. 134—145 (in Russ.).
17. Turovsky R.F. Kul’turnye landshafty Rossii [Cultural Landscapes of Russia]. Moscow, Rossiiskii Nauchno-Issledovatel’skii Institut Kul’turnogo i Prirodnogo Naslediya Publ., 1998, 208 p.
18. Likhachev D.S. Literatura — real’nost’ — literatura [Literature — Reality — Literature]. Leningrad, Sovetskii Pisatel’ Publ., 1984, 271 p.
19. Kuleshova M.E., Streletsky V.N. Formation and Evolution of Perceptions of Cultural Landscape, V fokuse naslediya: sbornik statei [In Focus of Heritage: collected articles]. Moscow, Institut Geografii Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk Publ., 2017, pp. 313—329 (in Russ.).
20. Vedenin Yu.A., Kuleshova M.E. (eds.) Kul’turnyi landshaft kak ob”ekt naslediya [Cultural Landscape as a Heritage Object]. Moscow, Institut Naslediya Publ., St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin Publ., 2004, 617 p.
21. Kuleshova M.E. Forms of Natural and Cultural Heritage Protection and the Category of Cultural Landscape, Gorizonty gumanitarnogo znaniya, 2017, no. 4, pp. 31—43. DOI: 10.17805/ggz.2017.4.5 (in Russ.).
22. Carey J.W. Communication as Culture. Essays on Media and Society, Revised Edition. New York, Routledge Publ., 2008, 240 p.
23. Hall S. Encoding/Decoding, Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972—1979. London, New York, Routledge/Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies Publ., University of Birmingham Publ. (reprint 1996), pp. 128—138.
24. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 30 t. [Works: in 30 volumes]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1958, vol. 12, pp. 716—720.
25. Barthes R. Elements of Semiology, Strukturalizm: “za” i “protiv”: sbornik statei [Structuralism: “For” and “Against”: collected articles]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1975, pp. 114—164 (in Russ.).
26. Barthes R. Mythologies. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2008, 351 p. (in Russ.).
27. Soini K., Birkeland I. Exploring the Scientific Discourse on Cultural Sustainability, Geoforum, 2014, vol. 51, pp. 213—223. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001.
28. Latour B. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2018, 335 p. (in Russ.).
29. Komissarova A. Protected Art, Aroundart.org: nezavisimoe izdanie o sovremennoi kul’ture i iskusstve [Aroundart.org: an independent publication about contemporary culture and art]. 2014, September 4. Available at: http://aroundart.org/2014/09/04/zapovednoe-iskusstvo/ (accessed 02.11.2024) (in Russ.).
30. Shestakova A. Natural Thinking, Kommersant. 2015, no. 152, pp. 4, August 22. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2794286 (accessed 02.11.2024) (in Russ.).
31. Komissarova A. A Wonderful Protected World, Aroundart.org: nezavisimoe izdanie o sovremennoi kul’ture i iskusstve [Aroundart.org: an independent publication about contemporary culture and art]. 2015, September 8. Available at: http://aroundart.org/2015/09/08/divnogorie-2015/ (accessed 02.11.2024) (in Russ.).
32. Lylov M., Malinovskaya Ya. This Year, as Part of the Art Project..., Nablyudeniya otkrytogo prostranstva: gruppa VKontakte [Discovering Open Space: Vkontakte Group]. 2015, July 28. Available at: https://vk.com/observationofopenspace?w=wall-98980519_3 (accessed 02.11.2024) (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Malinovskaya Ya.V. Interdisciplinary Creative Laboratories for “Sustainable” Heritage Actualization. Observatory of Culture. 2025;22(1):65-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2025-22-1-65-75