

Cultural Tourism as a Resource for Memory Studies
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2024-21-4-348-357
Abstract
The article is devoted to the comprehension of tourism as an important tool for the preservation of cultural and historical heritage and the transmission of collective memory. Cultural and historical heritage (both tangible and intangible) is a factor in strengthening national identity and maintaining collective memory, being at the same time one of the main tourist resources that allow us to get in touch with history and culture. The study of the phenomenon of tourism from the perspective of memory studies clearly demonstrates that the direct visit of tourists to significant historical sites with a high level of symbolic capital contributes to a better perception of the images of the past embedded in them, and the impressions and experiences help not only to remember the information, but also to feel their own belonging to a certain culture. The example of sites important in the context of global and local history, such as the Battle of Stalingrad Museum-Reserve (Volgograd), the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum (Auschwitz) and the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum, shows how places of memory become popular tourist destinations without being overly commodified and commercialized. Consequently, a targeted approach to the positioning of cultural and historical sites and working with niche types of tourism that reflect the characteristics of specific places of memory provide an opportunity to develop tourism as one of the key forms of actualizing the past. This helps to attract a wide audience to learn about their history through interaction with authentic sites, rather than solely through entertainment media, and also reduces the risk of loss of cultural and historical heritage, which makes it possible to consider areas remote from major cultural centers as promising destinations.
About the Authors
Ekaterina D. BugrovaRussian Federation
19 Mira Str., Yekaterinburg, 620002, Russia
ORCID 0000-0001-9304-1327; SPIN 9311-7978
Natalia B. Kirillova
Russian Federation
19 Mira Str., Yekaterinburg, 620002, Russia
ORCID 0000-0002-9187-7080; SPIN 5004-0339
References
1. Koshman L.V. Cultural Heritage as a Factor of Historical Memory, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 8. Istoriya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 8. History], 2011, no. 5, pp. 7—15 (in Russ.).
2. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, UNESCO. World Heritage Convention. 2023, September 24, 182 p. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/ (accessed 04.07.2024).
3. Sustainable Tourism Toolkit, UNESCO. World Heritage Convention. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/sustainabletourismtoolkit/ (accessed 04.07.2024).
4. Velikaya N.M. Cultural Development of Small and Medium-Sized Cities of Russia as a Factor of Preserving National Identity, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2021, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 240—253. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2021-18-3-240-253 (in Russ.).
5. Urry J. Globalising the Tourist Gaze, Massovaya kul’tura: Sovremennye zapadnye issledovaniya [Mass Culture: Modern Western Studies]. Moscow, Fond Nauchnykh Issledovanii “Pragmatika Kul’tury” Publ., 2005, pp. 136—150 (in Russ.).
6. Halbwachs M. On Collective Memory. Moscow, Novoe Izdatel’stvo Publ., 2007, 348 p. (in Russ.).
7. Hobsbawm E., Ranger T. (eds.) The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2013, 324 p.
8. Bergson H. Creative Evolution. Matter and Memory. Minsk, Kharvest Publ., 1999, 1408 p. (in Russ.).
9. Ricoeur P. Memory, History, Forgetting. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Gumanitarnoi Literatury Publ., 2004, 728 p. (in Russ.).
10. Le Goff J. History and Memory. Moscow, Rossiiskaya Politicheskaya Ehntsiklopediya Publ., 2013, 303 p. (in Russ.).
11. Assmann J. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Moscow, Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury Publ., 2004, 368 p. (in Russ.).
12. Assmann A. Dlinnaya ten’ proshlogo. Memorial’naya kul’tura i istoricheskaya politika [The Long Shadow of the Past: Memorial Culture and Historical Politics]. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2018, 328 p.
13. Nora P., Ozouf M., Puymège G., Winock M. Frantsiya-pamyat’ [France-Memory]. St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, 1999, 328 p.
14. Shub M.L. Social, Collective, and Cultural Memory: A New Approach to the Definition of the Semantic Borders of Concepts, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2017, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 4—11. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-1-4-11 (in Russ.).
15. Shub M.L. Memorial Identity in the Local Identity Structure of Industrial Cities Residents in the Southern Urals, Diskurs-Pi [Discourse-P], 2022, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 72—87. DOI: 10.17506/18179568_2022_19_2_72 (in Russ.).
16. Vasiliev A.G. Cultural Memory/Forgetting and National Identity: Theoretical Foundations of the Analysis, Kul’turnaya pamyat’ v kontekste formirovaniya natsional’noi identichnosti Rossii v XXI veke [Cultural Memory in the Context of Russian National Identity Formation in the 19th Century]. Moscow, Sovpadenie Publ., 2012, pp. 29—57 (in Russ.).
17. Fedotova N.G. City’s Cultural Memory: Modern Practices of Symbolizing the Past, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2021, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 352—364. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2021-18-4-352-364 (in Russ.).
18. Astafyeva O.N. Historical Memory as a Resource of Cultural Policy and the Formation of a Collective Identity, Kul’turnaya pamyat’ v kontekste formirovaniya natsional’noi identichnosti Rossii v XXI veke [Cultural Memory in the Context of Russian National Identity Formation in the 19th Century]. Moscow, Sovpadenie Publ., 2012, pp. 95—114 (in Russ.).
19. Nikolai F.V. Cultural Memory in a Consumerist Society: Review of M. Sturken’s Work, Dialog so vremenem [Dialogue with Time], 2014, issue 47, pp. 251—256. Available at: https://roii.ru/r/1/47.17 (accessed 04.07.2024) (in Russ.).
20. Cole T. Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler: How History Is Bought, Packaged and Sold. New York, Routledge Publ., 1999, 214 p.
21. Haggard H.R. A Winter Pilgrimage: Being an Account of Travels Through Palestine, Italy, and the Island of Cyprus, Accomplished in the Year 1900. London, New York, Bombay, Longmans, Green, and Co. Publ., 1901, 355 p.
22. Golovashina O.V. Back to Representations: In Search of Grounds for Collective Memory, Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Russian Sociological Review], 2022, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 59—83. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2022-3-59-83 (in Russ.).
23. Inscription: Hiroshima Peace Memorial (Genbaku Dome) (Japan): Decision 20 COM VIII.C, UNESCO. World Heritage Convention. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/2997/ (accessed 04.07.2024).
24. Auschwitz Birkenau German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940—1945), UNESCO. World Heritage Convention. Available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/31 (accessed 04.07.2024).
25. Hiroshima Peace Memorial (Genbaku Dome), UNESCO. World Heritage Convention. 2018, August 6. Available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/775 (accessed 04.07.2024).
26. The Criteria for Selection, UNESCO. World Heritage Convention. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/criteria/ (accessed 04.07.2024).
27. Posetite Pol’shu [Visit Poland]. Moscow, Vneshtorgizdat Publ., no. 17126.
28. Theme Index Report 2022, AECOM. Available at: https://aecom.com/theme-index/ (accessed 04.07.2024).
29. News. 1 Million 670 Thousand People Visited the Memorial in 2023. Memorial and Museum Auschwitz Birkenau. Former German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp. 2024, January 3. Available at: https://www.auschwitz.org/en/museum/news/1-million-670-thousand-people-visited-the-memorial-in-2023,1663.html (accessed 04.07.2024).
30. Hiroshima Peace Memorial (Atomic Bomb Dome), Japan National Tourism Organization. Available at: https://www.japan.travel/en/spot/2202/ (accessed 04.07.2024).
31. Witek-Malicka W. Fact-Cheking “The Tattooist of Auschwitz”, Memoria: Memory. History. Education, 2018, no. 14, pp. 6—17. Available at: https://viewer.joomag.com/memoria-en-no-14-11-2018/0766192001543510530 (accessed 04.07.2024).
32. Mamayev Kurgan Memorial Complex “To the Heroes of the Battle of Stalingrad”, UNESCO. World Heritage Convention. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5936/ (accessed 04.07.2024).
33. Andreeva O.V. The Great Patriotic War in the Historical Memory of Russia, Rossiya v voinakh i lokal’nykh voennykh konfliktakh XX — nachala XXI v.: sbornik materialov Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Sterlitamak, 28 sentyabrya 2018 g.) [Russia in Wars and Military Conflicts of the 20th and Early 21st Centuries: Proceedings of All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Sterlitamak, September 28, 2018)]. Sterlitamak, Sterlitamakskii Filial BashGU Publ., 2018, pp. 5—11(in Russ.).
34. Venediktova L.N. Kontsept “voina” v yazykovoi kartine mira (sopostavitel’noe issledovanie na materiale angliiskogo i russkogo yazykov) [The Concept of “War” in the Linguistic Picture of the World (Comparative Study Based on the Material from English and Russian Languages)], Cand. philos. sci. diss. abstr. Tyumen, 2004, 20 p.
35. Baranova V.A., Dontsov A.I. Collective Memory of Events of Russia of the 20th Century in the Modern Russian Society, Chelovecheskii kapital [Human Capital], 2017, no. 11 (107), pp. 76—82 (in Russ.).
36. Dulina N.V. Cultural Memory as a Mechanism of Identification in the Socio-Cultural Space of the City (On the Example of Volgograd), XXII Ural’skie sotsiologicheskie chteniya. Natsional’nye proekty i sotsial’no-ehkonomicheskoe razvitie Ural’skogo regiona: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Ekaterinburg, 17—18 marta 2020 g.) [The 22nd Ural Sociological Readings. National Projects and Socio-Economic Development of the Ural Region: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Yekaterinburg, March 17—18, 2020]. Yekaterinburg, Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo Universiteta, 2020, pp. 404—408 (in Russ.).
37. Trigg D. The Memory of Place: A Phenomenology of the Uncanny. Athens, Ohio University Press Publ., 2012, 347 p.
- Accessibility of cultural and historical heritage sites is a significant factor in the formation of collective memory.
- The practice of introducing new directions and products to the cultural and educational tourism market as an opportunity to ensure the preservation and proper maintenance of historical and cultural monuments in areas remote from established recognized centers of cultural attraction.
- Motivation for travel as an attribute of culture and an effective tool for its development.
- The actual stage of the evolution of memory studies as a sought-after opportunity to travel not only in space but also in time is the formation of a new memorial paradigm that influences the functioning of collective memory.
- The costs of the process of increasing the role of mass media in modern practices of symbolizing the past are the threat of transforming culture from a transmitter of collective memory into a commercial attraction.
- Sites directly connected with events endowed with special symbolic meaning have their own unique atmosphere and generate specific emotions, experiences and a unique feeling of travelers’ involvement in these events.
Review
For citations:
Bugrova E.D., Kirillova N.B. Cultural Tourism as a Resource for Memory Studies. Observatory of Culture. 2024;21(4):348-357. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2024-21-4-348-357