Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Criticism of the USA in the Film Journalism of the USSR in the 1960s

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2025-22-3-327-335

Abstract

The article presents the results of the study of artistic techniques and ideological approaches used by Soviet documentary filmmakers in the film journalism of the 1960s, devoted to criticism of the USA, its foreign and domestic policy, cultural and social sphere. The choice of the USSR’s main political opponent as the object of study is natural, since the most important specialists (R.L. Karmen, A.I. Medvedkin, Yu.V Mongolovsky, et. al.), authors of such significant films as “Sputnik Speaks” (1959), “Reason Against Madness” (1960), “The Law of Meanness” (1962), “Military Bases on Foreign Territories” (1965), “Friendship with a Hack” (1965), “The Movie Camera Accuses” (1967), “Sclerosis of Conscience” (1968), “The American Way” (1971), etc. Thanks to them, in a relatively short period of time, Soviet film journalism was enriched with new techniques and concepts aimed at effectively constructing the image of a political opponent and a political ally in the screen arts. The analysis has revealed the well-known genre fluctuations: the film-pamphlet and the film reportage, their aesthetics formed the basis of Russian film journalism of the 1960s. The trend reflected the tasks set for documentary cinema during the escalation of the Cold War. The images of enemy and ally played the main role, and film journalism as a synthesis of literary form (pamphlet, essay) and screen image took an important place here. The high frequency of Soviet documentary filmmakers’ treatment of the subject of American aggression in Vietnam testifies to the active use of the image of the USSR not only as a peaceful state, America’s opponent, but also as a victorious country in World War II. The treatment of the ideological confrontation between the USSR and the USA through the prism of the victory over Nazism explains the frequent motive of comparing the conquering foreign policy of the USA, its imperial ambitions with the foreign policy of Germany and its satellite countries in the 1940s. The Vietnam War as an actual and contemporary event of those years is used as the most significant argument of the ideological failure of the USA and its role as a world hegemon that chose the wrong path of historical development. At the same time, the sharp form of film journalism allows the authors to generalize the Vietnamese theme into an extended metaphor.

About the Author

Maksim F. Kazyuchits
All-Russian State University of Cinematography named after S.A. Gerasimov
Russian Federation

3 Wilhelm Pika Str., Moscow, 129226, Russia

ORCID 0000-0002-3015-3046; SPIN 1373-9140



References

1. Malkova L.Yu. Sovremennost’ kak istoriya: realizatsiya mifa v dokumental’nom kino [Modernity as History: The Realization of Myth in Documentary Film]. Moscow, Materik Publ., 2002, 187 p.

2. Salnikova E.V. Thinking About the Prehistory of Documentary Essence of Contemporary Visual Culture, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2015, no. 2, pp. 34—41. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2015-0-2-34-41 (in Russ.).

3. Kazyuchits M.F. Neigrovoe. Ehksperimental’nyi i dokumental’nyi fil’m v SSHA, Kanade i Rossii 1950—2000-kh gg. [Non-Fiction. Experimental and Documentary Film in the United States, Canada and Russia 1950—2000s]. Moscow, Akademiya Mediaindustrii Publ., 2016, 166 p.

4. Ikh oruzhie — kinokamera: Rasskazy frontovykh kinooperatorov [A Movie Camera Is Their Weapon: The Stories of Frontline Cameramen]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1984, 278 p.

5. “Vrag nomer odin” v simvolicheskoi politike kinematografii SSSR i SSHA perioda kholodnoi voiny [“Enemy Number One” in the Symbolic Politics of Soviet and US Cinematographies During the Cold War]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2023, 397 p.

6. Zhuravleva V.I. Russia and the United States as Constitutive Others in the National Identity Discourses, Mezhdunarodnaya analitika [Journal of International Analytics], 2024, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20—45. DOI: 10.46272/2587-8476-2024-15-1-20-45 (in Russ.).

7. Sputnitskaya N.Yu. The Image of the Enemy and the Metaphors of the Cold War in the Soviet Cinema Tales and the US Heroic Comics. (1960—1963), Novyi istoricheskii vestnik [The New Historical Bulletin], 2023, no. 76 (2), pp. 100—119 (in Russ.).

8. Crockatt R. The Fifty Years War: The United States and the Soviet Union in World Politics, 1941—1991. London, New York, Routledge Publ., 1995, 417 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203206263.

9. Cull N.J. The Cold War and the United States Information Agency. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2008, 533 p. DOI: 10.1017/SVO9780511817151.

10. Rofstadter R. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Cambridge, Harvard, Harvard Univ. Press Publ., 1979, 314 p.

11. Yudin K.A. Sovetskaya kinopolitika nakanune i v period “kholodnoi voiny” [Soviet Cinema Policy on the Eve and During the Cold War]. Ivanovo, Informatika Publ., 2023, 429 p.

12. Fomin V.I. Na pepelishche. Sovetskoe poslevoennoe kino. 1945—1953 gg. Dokumenty i svidetel’stva [On the Ashes. Soviet Postwar Cinema. 1945—1953. Documents and Evidence]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2024, vol. 1, 792 p.

13. Merkel M.M. Ugol zreniya: (Dialog s Urusevskim) [The Angle of View: (Dialogue with Urusevsky)]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1980, 135 p.

14. Karmen R.L. Kinopublitsistika i sovremennost’: doklad sekretarya Pravleniya Soyuza kinematografistov SSSR R.L. Karmena na IV Plenume Pravleniya [Cinema Journalism and Modernity: Report of the Secretary of the Board of the Union of Cinematographers of the USSR R.L. Karmen at the 4th Plenum of the Board]. Moscow, 1973, 31 p.

15. Razlogov K., Kochelyaeva N., Sopin A. et al. Sovetskoe kino v mirovom kontekste: kollektivnaya monografiya [Soviet Cinema in a Clobal Context: a collective monograph]. Moscow, Al’ma Mater: Gaudeamus Publ., 2024, 686 p.

16. Hicks J. The Victory Banner Over the Reichstag: Film, Document and Ritual in Russia’s Contested Memory of World War II. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press Publ., 2020, 296 p.

17. Drobashenko S.V. Prostranstvo ehkrannogo dokumenta [The Space of the On-Screen Document]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1986, 320 p.

18. Drobashenko S.V. Ehkran i zhizn’: O khudozhestvennom obraze v dokumental’nom fil’me [The Screen and Life: On the Artistic Image in the Documentary]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1962, 240 p.

19. Hicks J. The Cult of Personality in Mikhail Romm’s Films, Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal issledovanii kul’tury [International Journal of Cultural Research], 2018, no. 2 (31), pp. 83—91 (in Russ.).

20. Ognev K.K. Antifashistskaya tema v dokumental’nom kino sotsialisticheskikh stran [Antifascist Theme in Documentary Cinema of Socialist Countries]. Moscow, Znanie Publ., 1985, 48 p.

21. Dolmatovskaya G.E. Listki lunnogo kalendarya: Agressiya SSHA vo V’etname i mirovoi ehkran [Lunar Calendar Pages: The US Aggression in Vietnam and the World Screen]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1985, 241 p.

22. Karmen R.L. V’etnam srazhaetsya: zapiski sovetskogo kinooperatora [Vietnam Is Fighting: Notes of a Soviet Cameraman]. Moscow, Voenizdat Publ., 1958, 263 p.


Review

For citations:


Kazyuchits M.F. Criticism of the USA in the Film Journalism of the USSR in the 1960s. Observatory of Culture. 2025;22(3):327-335. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2025-22-3-327-335

Views: 10


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)