Inverse Model of Development and the “Linguistic Turn” in Philosophy
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2015-0-5-9-16
Abstract
The article analyzes the essence of the so-called “Linguistic Turn” in philosophy. The “Linguistic Turn” is considered in the context of the original model of evolutionary development. This model of development is based on the conception of inverse relations (internal contradictions), their development and resolution. During the progressive development of humanity, a series of revolutionary leaps (aromorphoses) takes place, one of them is being observed at the present time. Within those leaps, the accumulated systemic contradictions (inversions) are eliminated, but the prerequisites for new contradictions are created. The article demonstrates that the current stage of humanity development has been depicted and anticipated in the “Linguistic Turn”.
References
1. Arnauld A., Nicole P. Logika, ili Iskusstvo myslit’ [La Logique ou l’art de penser]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991, 414 p.
2. Batishchev G. S. Protivorechie kak kategoriya dialekticheskoi logiki. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1963, 120 p.
3. Bernshtein N. A. Fiziologiya dvizhenii i aktivnost’. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1990, 494 p.
4. Wittgenstein L. Golubaya i korichnevaya knigi: predvaritel’nye materialy k “Filosofskim issledovaniyam” [Blue and Brown Books. Preliminary Studies for the “Philosophical Investigations”]. Novosibirsk, Sibirskoe universitetskoe izdatel’stvo Publ., 2008, 256 p.
5. Humboldt W. von. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu. Moscow, OAO IG “Progress” Publ., 2000, 400 p.
6. Gurevich P. S. Fenomen deantropologizatsii cheloveka. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 2009, no. 3, pp. 19—31.
7. Deschamps L. M. Istina, ili Istinnaya sistema [Vrai système]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1973, 532 p.
8. Cassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form Vol. 1, Yazyk [Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Band 1, Die Sprache]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2002, 272 p.
9. Lévi-Strauss C. Strukturnaya antropologiya [Anthropologie structurale]. Moscow, EKSMO-Press, 2001, 512 p.
10. Lenk H. Razmyshleniya o sovremennoi tekhnike. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 1996, 183 p.
11. Markov B. V. Znaki bytiya. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2001, 567 p.
12. Marx K. Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844 (in Russ.), Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], vol. 42. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1974, pp. 41—174.
13. Maturana H., Varela F. J. Drevo poznaniya [El Arbol del Conocimiento: Las Bases Biologicas del Conocer Humano]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2001, pp. 182—207.
14. Nikolin V. V. Mashinnost’ kak vseobshchii printsip vosproizvodstva: Ontologicheskii aspekt (ontologicheskii aspekt ekspansii mashiny v nemashinnye sfery bytiya), Doct. diss. Omsk, Omsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2002, 32 p.
15. Orudzhev Z. M. Priroda cheloveka i smysl istorii. Moscow, “LIBROKOM” Publ., 2009, 448 p.
16. Plato, Kratylos, Collected Works, vol. 1. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1990, pp. 661—662.
17. Stepin V. S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya. Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura. St. Petersburg, Mir Publ., 2009, pp. 249—295.
18. Barnes J. Truth, etc. Six Lectures on Ancient Logic. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2007, p. 204.
19. Jameson F. Postmodernism and Consumer Society. Available at: http://art.ucsc.edu/sites/default/files/Jameson_Postmodernism_and_Consumer_Society.pdf (accessed 24.08.2014).
20. Koopman С. Rorty’s Linguistic Turn: Why (More Than) Language Matters to Philosophy. Contemporary Pragmatism, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 61—84.
21. Peregrin J. Linguistics and Philosophy. Theoretical Linguistic, 1998, no. 25, pp. 245—264.
22. Rorty R. M. (ed.). The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1992, 407 p.
23. Szubka T. Richard Rorty and the Analytic Tradition: Radical Break or Partial Continuity? Diametros, no. 25, pp. 146—158.
24. Watzka Н. Did Wittgenstein ever take the Linguistic Turn? Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 58, 2002, pp. 549—568.
Review
For citations:
Sevostyanov D.A. Inverse Model of Development and the “Linguistic Turn” in Philosophy. Observatory of Culture. 2015;(5):9-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2015-0-5-9-16
Views:
1261
Email this article 