The “Fandango” Ballet by L. Lubovitch in the Light of Mythos-Rituality: the Comprehension Experience
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2015-0-5-44-49
Abstract
The article analyzes the dependence of the musical composition by M. Ravel’s ideological and imaginative interpretation on the contemporary context. For the first time ever, a substantial interpretation of the “Fandango” ballet is given in two different perspectives - theatrical-scenic and ritual. The author makes an attempt to reveal the complex of semantic meanings of musical, dance-plastic and scenographic texts of the ballet. As a result of intersection of the above mentioned semantic meanings, the whole artistic meaning comes to light.
References
1. Béjart M. Mgnovenie v zhizni drugogo: memuary [Un Instant dans la vie d’autrui: mémoires]. Moscow, Izdanie Publ., 1989, 238 p.
2. Beilis V. A. Teoriya rituala v trudakh Viktora Ternera, Turner V. Simvol i ritual. Moscow, Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoi literatury izdatel’stva “Nauka” Publ. 1983, pp. 7—31.
3. Vybyvanets E. V. Kakim uvidel M. Béjart “Boléro”, M. Ravela: k voprosu o metodakh vizualizatsii muzykal’noi klassiki [What M. Béjart saw “Boléro” by M. Ravel: to the question the methods of visualization classical music], Aspectus. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchnyi zhurnal[Aspectus. The International Scientific Journal], 2014, no. 3, pp. 15—28.
4. Gennep A. van. Obryady perekhoda. Sistematicheskoe izuchenie obryadov [Les rites de passage. Étude systématique]. Moscow, Vostochnaya literatura RAN Publ., 1999, 198 p.
5. Denisov A. V. Antichnyi mir v opere pervoi poloviny 20 veka. St. Petersburg, A. I. Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Publ., 2006, 233 p.
6. Erasov B. S. Obychai, Kul’turologiya. 20 vek. St. Petersburg, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 1997, 630 p.
7. Karmin A. S. Kul’turologiya. St. Petersburg, Lan’, 2004, 928 p.
8. Kozlov V. V., Girshon A. E., Veremeenko N. I. Integrativnaya tantseval’no-dvigatel’naya terapiya. St. Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2006, 286 p.
9. Koroleva E. A. Rannie formy tantsa. Chişinău, Ştiinţa, 1977, 215 p.
10. Kuznetsova H. S. Spektr tsennostei pamyatnika arkhitektury [Range of Values of Architectural Monument], Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2014, no. 1, p. 63.
11. Leach E. Kul’tura i kommunikatsiya. Logika vzaimosvyazi simvolov [Culture and Communication. The Logic by Which Symbols are Connected]. Moscow, Vostochnaya literatura RAN Publ., 2001, pp. 55—58.
12. Keldysh Yu. V. (ed.). Muzykal’naya entsiklopediya, vol. 5. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1981, 1056 p.
13. Tanets kak terapiya. Svobodnoe dvizhenie. Interview s A. Girshonom. Available at: http://meditation-portal.com/tanec-kak-terapiya-svobodnoe-dvizhenie-intervyu-s-a-girshonom/ (accessed 15.09.2015).
14. Toporov V. N. O rituale. Vvedenie v problematiku, Arkhaicheskii ritual v fol’klornykh i ranneliteraturnykh pamyatnikakh. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988, pp. 7—60.
15. Turner V. Simvol i ritual. Moscow, Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoi literatury izdatel’stva “Nauka” Publ., 1983, 277 p.
16. Furs V. N. Ritual, Noveishii filosofskii slovar’ [The Newest Philosophical Dictionary]. Minsk, Knizhnyi Dom Publ., 2003, p. 329.
17. Khudekov S. N. Vseobshchaya istoriya tantsa. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2010, 608 p.
18. Eliade M. Tainye obshchestva. Obryady initsiatsii i posvyashcheniya [Birth and rebirth]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 1999, 356 p.
Review
For citations:
Vybyvanets E.V. The “Fandango” Ballet by L. Lubovitch in the Light of Mythos-Rituality: the Comprehension Experience. Observatory of Culture. 2015;(5):44-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2015-0-5-44-49
Views:
721
Email this article 