Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

Participatory Art: from the “Relational Aesthetics” to the Post-Participatory Art

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2016-1-2-132-139

Abstract

This article analyzes the phenomenon of “participatory art” widely used today in different contemporary art-practices around the world. In the last decade of the twentieth century, the collapse of the Soviet bloc led to the loss of the socialism as an alternative model of social development, the establishment of the hegemony of neo-liberalism, and the emergence of the “end of history” concept. Altogether these factors created a demand of a social turn in the art and led to the widespread dissemination of the “socially-engaged art”. This kind of art sought to mend these gaps in existing social connections and provoke social change. This article offers a detailed examination of two approaches to the “socially-engaged art”: the French theorist Nicolas Bourriaud’s concept of “relational aesthetics” and the American researcher Claire Bishop’s notion of “participatory art”. The final part of the article gives a critical second thought to the both of the abovementioned approaches to the “socially-engaged art” in relation to the phenomenon of art-activism, which became widely known around the world at the beginning of the twenty-first century. In conclusion, the post-participatory art is advancing as an alternative model, which better accounts for these most recent artistic practices.

About the Author

Roman S. Osminkin

Russian Federation


References

1. Bishop C. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London, Verso, 2012, 382 p.

2. Bourriaud N. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon, Les presses du réel, 2002, 113 p.

3. Burrio N. Chto takoe “operativnyi realizm?”, Khudo­zhestvennyi zhurnal [Moscow Art Jourmal], 1993, no. 1, pp. 19—21 (in Russ.).

4. Burrio N. Estetika vzaimodeistviya, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Moscow Art Jourmal], 1999, no. 8/29, pp. 33—39.

5. Bishop C. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics, October, 2004, no. 110, pp. 51—79.

6. Rancière J. Eticheskii povorot v estetike i politike. Jacques Rancière ob ekvivalentnykh modelyakh v aktual’nom iskusstve i sovremennoi politike, Kriticheskaya Massa, 2005, no. 2 (in Russ.). Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/km/2005/2/ra8.html (accessed 07.05.2015).

7. Kester H.G. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley, University of California Press, 2004, 239 p.

8. Barber B., Bugden E., Dayton-Johnson J. et al. Littoral Art and Communicative Action. Windsor, Common Ground Publishing, 2013, 140 p.

9. Thompson N., Sholette G. (eds.). The Interventionists: Users Manual for the Creative Disruption of Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2004, 134 p.

10. Bishop K. Sotsial’nyi povorot v sovremennom iskusstve, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Moscow Art Jourmal], 2005, no. 58/59, pp. 33—38 (in Russ.).

11. Riff D. Interv’yu s Kler Bishop: Sotsial’no angazhi­rovannoe iskusstvo nuzhno otsenivat’ tol’ko esteticheski, OpenSpace.ru. Archive, 19.03.2010. Available at: http://os.colta.ru/art/events/details/16799/ (accessed 18.12.2015).

12. Breton A. Artificial Hells. Inauguration of the “1921 Dada Season”, October, 2003, no. 105, pp. 137—144.

13. Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed: 30th Anniversary Edition. New York, The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc., 2005, 183 p.

14. Bishop K. Delegirovannyi performans: autsorsing podlinnosti, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Moscow Art Jourmal], 2011, no. 82 (in Russ). Available at: http://www.permm.ru/menu/xzh/arxiv/82/delegirovannyij-performans:-autsorsing-podlinnosti.html (accessed 18.12.2015).

15. Thompson N. (ed.) Living as Form: Socially Engaged Art from 1991—2001. New York and Cambridge, Creative Time and MIT Press, 2012, 259 p.

16. Bishop C. Participation and Spectacle: Where Are We Now? Living as Form: Socially Engaged Art from 1991—2001. New York, Cambridge, Creative Time and MIT Press, 2012, pp. 34—46.

17. Mamedov G. Zhizn’ kak forma: mezhdu Feisbukom i Takhrirom, School of Theory and Activism — Bishkek (STAB) (in Russ.). Available at: http://www.art-initiatives.org/?p=8174 (accessed 18.12.2015).

18. The Yes Man. Available at: http://theyesmen.org/ (accessed: 18.12.2015).

19. Women on Waves. Available at: http://womenonwaves.org/ (accessed 18.12.2015).

20. Adbusters Media Foundation. Available at: https://www.adbusters.org/ (accessed 18.12.2015).

21. Partizaning. Participatory urban replanning. Available at: http://partizaning.org/ (accessed 18.12.2015).

22. Craigslist. Available at: http://www.craigslist.org/about/sites (accessed 18.12.2015).


Review

For citations:


Osminkin R.S. Participatory Art: from the “Relational Aesthetics” to the Post-Participatory Art. Observatory of Culture. 2016;1(2):132-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2016-1-2-132-139

Views: 4071


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)