Participatory Art: from the “Relational Aesthetics” to the Post-Participatory Art
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2016-1-2-132-139
Abstract
References
1. Bishop C. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London, Verso, 2012, 382 p.
2. Bourriaud N. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon, Les presses du réel, 2002, 113 p.
3. Burrio N. Chto takoe “operativnyi realizm?”, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Moscow Art Jourmal], 1993, no. 1, pp. 19—21 (in Russ.).
4. Burrio N. Estetika vzaimodeistviya, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Moscow Art Jourmal], 1999, no. 8/29, pp. 33—39.
5. Bishop C. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics, October, 2004, no. 110, pp. 51—79.
6. Rancière J. Eticheskii povorot v estetike i politike. Jacques Rancière ob ekvivalentnykh modelyakh v aktual’nom iskusstve i sovremennoi politike, Kriticheskaya Massa, 2005, no. 2 (in Russ.). Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/km/2005/2/ra8.html (accessed 07.05.2015).
7. Kester H.G. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley, University of California Press, 2004, 239 p.
8. Barber B., Bugden E., Dayton-Johnson J. et al. Littoral Art and Communicative Action. Windsor, Common Ground Publishing, 2013, 140 p.
9. Thompson N., Sholette G. (eds.). The Interventionists: Users Manual for the Creative Disruption of Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2004, 134 p.
10. Bishop K. Sotsial’nyi povorot v sovremennom iskusstve, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Moscow Art Jourmal], 2005, no. 58/59, pp. 33—38 (in Russ.).
11. Riff D. Interv’yu s Kler Bishop: Sotsial’no angazhirovannoe iskusstvo nuzhno otsenivat’ tol’ko esteticheski, OpenSpace.ru. Archive, 19.03.2010. Available at: http://os.colta.ru/art/events/details/16799/ (accessed 18.12.2015).
12. Breton A. Artificial Hells. Inauguration of the “1921 Dada Season”, October, 2003, no. 105, pp. 137—144.
13. Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed: 30th Anniversary Edition. New York, The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc., 2005, 183 p.
14. Bishop K. Delegirovannyi performans: autsorsing podlinnosti, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Moscow Art Jourmal], 2011, no. 82 (in Russ). Available at: http://www.permm.ru/menu/xzh/arxiv/82/delegirovannyij-performans:-autsorsing-podlinnosti.html (accessed 18.12.2015).
15. Thompson N. (ed.) Living as Form: Socially Engaged Art from 1991—2001. New York and Cambridge, Creative Time and MIT Press, 2012, 259 p.
16. Bishop C. Participation and Spectacle: Where Are We Now? Living as Form: Socially Engaged Art from 1991—2001. New York, Cambridge, Creative Time and MIT Press, 2012, pp. 34—46.
17. Mamedov G. Zhizn’ kak forma: mezhdu Feisbukom i Takhrirom, School of Theory and Activism — Bishkek (STAB) (in Russ.). Available at: http://www.art-initiatives.org/?p=8174 (accessed 18.12.2015).
18. The Yes Man. Available at: http://theyesmen.org/ (accessed: 18.12.2015).
19. Women on Waves. Available at: http://womenonwaves.org/ (accessed 18.12.2015).
20. Adbusters Media Foundation. Available at: https://www.adbusters.org/ (accessed 18.12.2015).
21. Partizaning. Participatory urban replanning. Available at: http://partizaning.org/ (accessed 18.12.2015).
22. Craigslist. Available at: http://www.craigslist.org/about/sites (accessed 18.12.2015).
Review
For citations:
Osminkin R.S. Participatory Art: from the “Relational Aesthetics” to the Post-Participatory Art. Observatory of Culture. 2016;1(2):132-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2016-1-2-132-139