The Problem of Tacit Knowledge in the Conditions of Educational Changes
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2016-13-3-260-268
Abstract
In the critical situation of the educational system, it is necessary to create a different educational development paradigm, based not only on dynamism, but also on maintenance of stability, supported by the cultural classics. The cultural classics perform the role of a material-ideal substrate between the past and the present, between the present and the future; and represent the process of personality formation, resulted by the interaction between Yours and Others’, the creation and translation of the new measure as a limit of the new quality and the idea presented in the form of goals and values. The classics become a kind of tacit knowledge, i. e. knowledge of non-problematic (“self-evident”) cognitive basis. The cognitive effort to overcome the “epistemological break” is of creative nature and brings together the humanitarian education and art.
About the Authors
Vera A. Fortunatova
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena V. Valeeva
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod Arzamas Branch
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Arkhipova O.V. Ideya obrazovaniya v kontekste postneklassicheskoj kul’tury [The idea of Education in the Context of Postnonclassical Culture], Dr. philos. sci. diss. St. Petersburg, 2012, 392 p.
2. Delez G. Tajna Ariadny [Ariadne’s secret], Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 1993, no. 4, pp. 48—59.
3. Freud Z. Totem i tabu. Psikhologiya pervobytnoj kul’tury i religii [Totem and Taboo. Psychology of Primeval Culture and Religion], Trudy raznykh let [Works of different years]. Tbilisi, Merani Publ., 1991, book 1, 220 p. (in Russ.).
4. Fortunatova V.A., Antropologiya obraznykh sostoyanij kak nravstvenno-didakticheskaya problema [Anthropology of Figurative States as Moral — Didactic Problem], Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya [The World of Science, Culture and Education]. Gorno-Altajsk, 2011, no. 4(29), part 1, pp. 355—358.
5. Fortunatova V.A., Platonova Yu.A. Trivilizatsiya obrazovaniya kak model’ sotsial’noj dinamiki v sovremennykh informatsionnykh usloviyakh [Trivilization of education as the model of modern dynamics in contemporary informational conditions], Filosofskie problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologij i kiberprostranstv [Philosophical problems of information technology and cyberspaces], 2015, no. 1(9), pp. 34—35.
6. Prangishvili I.V. Entropiinye i drugie sistemnye zakonomernosti: voprosy upravleniya slozhnymi sistemami [Entropy and Other Systematic Patterns: Problems of Managing of Complex Systems]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2003, 428 p.
7. Polanyi M. Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago, The Univ. of Chicago Press Publ., 1962, 428 p. (in Eng.).
8. Marcuse H. Eros i tsivilizaciya. Odnomernyj chelovek: Issledovanie ideologii razvitogo industrial’nogo obshchestva [Eros and Civilization. One-dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society]. Moscow, OOO “AST” Publ., 2002, 526 p.
9. Shichanina Yu.V. Fenomen inomernosti v sovremennoj kul’ture (filosofsko kul’turologicheskij analiz) [Phenomenon of Otherscopeness in Contemporary Culture]. Rostov-na-Donu, 2004, 240 p.
10. Fortunatova V.A., Valeeva E.V. Odnomernyj chelovek v mnogomernoj gumanitaristike (problemy i puti ih resheniya v sovremennom obrazovanii) [One Dimensional Man in Multidimensional Humanities], Voprosy kul’turologii [Culturology], 2014, no. 8, pp. 53—58.
11. Fortunatova V.A. Kul’tura i obrazovanie [Culture and Education]. N. Novgorod, NPGU Publ., 2010, 411 p.
12. Petersen J., Reinert G.B. (eds.) Theorien und Konzepte der pädagogische Antropologie. Donauworth, 1994, pp. 19—20 (in Ger.).
13. Slobodchikov V.I. Antropologicheskaya perspektiva otechestvennogo obrazovaniya [Anthropological Perspective of Domestic Education]. Ekaterinburg, Izd-kij otdel Ekaterinburgskoj eparhii Publ., 2009, 264 p.
14. Nugaev R.M. Problema rosta sotsiogumanitarnogo znaniya [The Problem of the Growth of Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge], Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 2007, no. 8, pp. 58—69.
15. Avdeeva E.A. Gumanitarizatsiya sistemy obrazovaniya [Humanization of Education System], Dr. philos. sci. diss. Krasnoyarsk, 2012, 408 p.
16. Gerasimova I.A. (ed.) Vizual’nyj obraz (Mezhdisciplinarnye issledovaniya) [Visual image (Interdisciplinary researches)]. Moscow, IFRAN Publ., 2008, 247 p.
17. Fortunatova V.A., Valeeva E.V. Gumanitarnaya energiya sovremennogo obrazovatel’nogo protsessa [Humanitarian Energy of Modern Educational Process], Voprosy kul’turologii [Russian Studies in Culturology], 2013, no. 11, pp. 15—18.
18. Makarova N.A. Ot pervobytnykh tabu k sovremennym kul’turnym normam i zapretam [From Primeval Taboo to Modern Cultural Norms and Prohibitions], Gnozis: kul’turologiya [Gnosis: culturology]. N. Novgorod, NPGU Publ., 2010, p. 108.
19. Aristotle. O dushe [On the Soul]. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomah [Works in 4 vol.]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1976, vol. 1, pp. 369—447 (in Russ.).
20. Hegel’ G.V.F. Iz filosofii propedevtiki [From the Philosophy of Propaedeutics], Estetika [Aesthetics, in four vol.]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1973, vol. 4, pp. 7—209 (in Russ.).
21. Baudrillard J. Simvolicheskij obmen i smert’ [L’échange Symbolique et la Mort]. Moscow, Dobrosvet Publ., 2000, 384 p.
22. Levi-Stros K Pervobytnoe myshlenie [Primeval Thinking]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1994, 384 p.
23. Rudneva D.A.“Chelovek glamurnyj” kak sotsiokul’turnyj konstrukt obshchestva potrebleniya: k voprosu o metodah issledovaniya sovremennoj kul’tury [“Glamour Man” as a Socio-Cultural Construct of the Society of Consumption], III Kul’turologicheskij kongress s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [3d Culturological Congress with International Participation], 2010, p. 250.
24. Valeeva E.V. Obrazovanie kak forma bytiya [Education as a Form of Existence], Idei i idealy [Ideas and ideals], 2015, no. 1 (23), vol. 2, pp. 130—143 (in Russ.).
25. Kulikova L.V. (ed.) Diskursivnye praktiki sovremennoj institutsional’noj kommunikatsii: monografiya [Discourse Practices of Modern Institutional Communication: Monograph]. Krasnoyarsk, Sib. Feder. University Publ., 2015, 182 p.
26. Musil R. Chelovek bez Slov [Der Mann Ohne Eigenschaften]. Moscow, EKSMO Publ., 2008, 1088 p. (in Russ.).
27. Valitskaya A.P. Kak vozmozhna obshchaya teoriya obrazovaniya, ili o mezhdisciplinarnom statuse ponyatiya «dialog» [How is the General Theory of Education Possible or About the Interdisciplinary Status of the concept of “Dialogue”], Dialog v obrazovanii. Sbornik materialov konferetscii. Seriya “Symposium” [Dialogue in Education. Collected articles of the conference. “Symposium” series, issue 22]. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo, 2002, pp. 9—16.
Review
For citations:
Fortunatova V.A., Valeeva E.V. The Problem of Tacit Knowledge in the Conditions of Educational Changes. Observatory of Culture. 2016;13(3):260-268. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2016-13-3-260-268
Views:
747
Email this article 