Contemporary Art of South Korea: Overcoming the Periphery

This article discusses the process of overcoming the cultural periphery and restoring the feeling of national dignity in the contemporary visual art of South Korea. The research subject is the visual art history of the Republic of Korea in the period of 1950s-2000s. Since the late 1950s to the present day, in different movements of the South Korean modern art, the intention has been constantly observed not only to raise their creative expression to the international level, but also to form the national identity. According to the author, the overcoming of the cultural periphery in the contemporary South Korean art has become possible due to the transformation of the concept of contemporaneity in a series of events in the recent history of the Republic of Korea. The author rests on the numerous scientific materials by South Korean art historians, who explore various trends in the contemporary art history of South Korea. As a result, the author was able to show the existence of a plan for the restoration of national identity in the South Korean art. The author’s special contribution in the study is a generic description and representation of the history of South Korean contemporary art, which is still poorly known in Russia. Results of the research can be used for further scientific development in the fields of Korean studies and art history.

20th century art, Korean contemporary art, South Korean history, National identity, Informel, Dansaekhwa, Minjung Art, Hyperrealism, Globalization

1. Li Sang Vu. Natsional’nye traditsii koreiskogo iskusstva i sovremennyi balet Yuzhnoi Korei [National Traditions of Korean Art and Modern Ballet of South Korea]. St. Petersburg, 2000, 144 p.

2. Kim Su Dzhin. Traditsii koreiskikh narodnykh predstavlenii v sovremennom monospektakle [Traditions of Korean Public Performances in Modern Solo Performance], Observatoriya Kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2015, no. 4, pp. 46—51.

3. Kireeva L.I. Stat’i po iskusstvu Korei : sb. izbrannykh statei i zametok [Articles on Art of Korea : Collection of Selected Articles and Notes]. Magnitogorsk, Magnitogorsky State University, 2006, 204 p.

4. Markov V.M. Iskusstvo Respubliki Koreya vtoroi poloviny XX veka [Art of Korean Republic of the Second Half of the 20th Century]. Vladivostok, Dal’nevost. Un-t. Publ., 2002, 336 p.

5. Rosenberg H. Action Painting: A Decade of Distortion, Art News, 1962, no. 61, December, pp. 42—45, 62—63.

6. Chung Moo-Jeong. Jeonhu chusangmisulgyeui eseupelanto, “aengpoleumel” gaenyeom-ui hyeongseong-gwa jeongae [The Formation and Development of the Concept Informel, Esperanto in the Postwar Art World], Misulsahak [Art History: Journal of Korean Association of Art History Education], 2003, vol. 17, pp. 7—43.

7. Kim Bok Young. Nungwa jeongsin: hangug hyeondaemisul ilon [Eye and Mind: Theory of Korean Contemporary Art]. Seoul, Hangilart Publ., 2006, 552 p.

8. Yoon Jin Seup. Hangug modeonijeum misul yeongu [A Study on Korean Modernism]. Seoul, Jaewon Publ., 2000, 230 p.

9. Kee J. Contemporary Korean art: Tansaekhwa and the Urgency of Method. Minneapolis, University Minnesota Press, 2013, 384 p.

10. Kim Joo Won. 1970nyeondae hangug “dansaeghwa” non-ui jaego [Rethinking of Discussion about Korean “Dansaekhwa” in 1970s], Mihag-yesulhag yeongu [The Journal of Aesthetics and Science of Art], 2002, vol. 16, pp. 185—204.

11. Kim Young Na. Hyeondaemisul-eseoui jeontong-ui seonbyeolgwa gyeseung: 1970nyeondaeui monokeulom misulgwa 1980nyeondae minjungmisul [The Two Traditions: Monochrome Painting of the 1970s and Minjung Misul of the 1980s], Jeongsinmunhwa yeongu [Research of Mental Culture], 2000, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 33—53.

12. Kim Bok Young. 1970nyeondae hangug-ui silheommisul — tajajeog segyeihaeui jeongu [Korean experimental art in 1970s — The initiative of understanding of the world in the context of otherness], Hangug hyeondaemisul saelo bogi [The New Look at the Korean Contemporary Fine Arts]. Seoul, Mijinsa Publ., 2007, pp. 204—218.

13. Won Dong Seok. Minjogmisul-ui nonliwa jeonmang [Logic and Views of National Art]. Seoul, Pulbit Publ., 1985, 420 p.

14. Choi Chang Jip, Seo Joong Seok, Lee Jong Beum, et al. Gwangjuhangjaeng-ui yeogsajeog seong-gyeoggwa 80nyeondaeui banmijajuhwa tujaeng [Historical Characteristics of Gwanju uprising and Anti-American Independence Movement in 80s], Yeogsabipyeong [Critical Review of History], 1989, vol. 5, pp. 47—75.

15. Kim Young Ho. Hangug geugsasil hoehwaui misulsajeog gyujeongmunje [Definition of the Korean Hyperrealism Painting in the Fine Art History], Hyeondaemisulhag nonmunjib [Journal of Contemporary Fine Arts], 2009, vol. 13, pp. 7—29.

16. Kim Mi Kyung. Hangug dansaegjohoehwa ihu “sinhyeongsang”-ui uimi [Meaning of “Neo-figurative” After Korean Monochromatic Painting], Hangughyeondaemisul 197080 [Korean Contemporary Fine Arts 197080]. Seoul, Hag-yeonmunhwasa Publ., 2005, pp. 73—102.