Limits of the Human Being: the Transhumanism in the Modern American Movies

The article is intended to identify the limits of human being, which are implicitly included in such works of the modern cinematography as “Transcendence” (2014) and “Chappie” (2015). These movies pay much attention to the problems of transhumanism. Referring to the philosoph ical ideas of the Modern Age, in the first place through those formulated by René Descartes, the article defines the phi losophical basis that leads in these movies to creation of the projects of human and technical synthesis. The author pays special attention to analysis of the relations of the “posthu man”, the synthesized creature, to the time and space, which plays an essential role in the modern movies referring to the themes of transhumanism. It is concluded, that the projects of human and technical synthesis, presented in the modern movies, originate from the Philosophy of Modern, particu larly from Cartesianism, where the mind is opposed to the body machine. According to the mass cinematography, a dis tinctive feature of the human mind synthesized with tech nics is to acquire some attributes of the European philoso phers’ idea of the Universal Mind overcoming the condition of space-time and having the ability of absolute knowledge, which finally leads to the depersonalization of human beings.

«Превосходство», «Робот по имени Чаппи», transhumanism, posthuman, limits of the human beingness, modern cinematography, Transcendence, Chappie

1. Deleuze G. Kino [Cinema]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 2004, 624 p.

2. Descartes R. Strasti dushi [Passions of the Soul], Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Works: in 2 vols.]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1989, vol. 1, pp. 481—572.

3. Descartes R. Rassuzhdenie o metode [Discourse on the Method], Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Works: in 2 vols.]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1989, vol. 1, pp. 250—296.

4. Heidegger M. Vopros o tekhnike [The question of technique], Sein und Zeit. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2007, pp. 306—329 (in Russ.)

5. Foucault M. Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la Prison. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 1999, 456 p. (in Russ.)

6. Mamardashvili M.K. Psikhologicheskaya topologiya puti [Psychological Topology of Path]. Moscow, Fond Meraba Mamardashvili Publ., 2014, 1232 p.

7. Dubrovskii D.I. Priroda cheloveka, massovoe soznanie i global’noe budushchee [Human Nature, the Mass Consciousness and Global Future], Global’noe budushchee 2045: antropologicheskii krizis, konvergentnye tekhnologii, transgumanitarnye proekty: materialy Pervoi vserossiiskoi konferentsii (Belgorod, 11—12 aprelya 2013 g.) [Proc. of the 1st All-Russian Conf. “Global Future 2045: Anthropological Crisis, Convergent Technologies, Transhumanist Projects” (Belgorod, 2013, April, 11—12)], Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2014, pp. 188—199.

8. Dudnik S.I., Kamnev V.M. O prostote istorii i khitrosti mirovogo razuma [About Simplicity of History and Ruse of World Reason], Voprosy fi losofi i [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 2015, no. 10, pp. 21—29.

9. Manifest Rossiiskogo Transgumanisticheskogo Dvizheniya [Manifesto of Russian Transhumanist Movement]. Available at: http://www.transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/10/8/ (accessed 09.03.2016).

10. Yudin B.G. Chto tam, posle gumanizma? [What is There after Humanism?], Global’noe budushchee 2045: antropologicheskii krizis, konvergentnye tekhnologii, transgumanitarnye proekty : materialy Pervoi vserossiiskoi konferentsii (Belgorod 11—12 aprelya 2013 g.) [Proc. of the 1st All-Russian Conf. “Global Future 2045: Anthropological Crisis, Convergent Technologies, Transhumanist Projects” (Belgorod, 2013, April, 11—12)], Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2014, pp. 26—43.

11. Gutner G.B. Risk i otvetstvennost’ sub’’ekta kommunikativnogo deistviya [Risk and Responsibility of the Subject of Communicative Action]. Moscow, Svyato-Filaretovskii Pravoslavno-Khristianskii Institute Publ., 2008, 248 p.

12. Regnier D. Soznanie i sovest’: Mamardashvili ob obshchei otpravnoi tochke epistemologicheskoi i moral’noi refleksii [Consciousness and Conscience: Mamardashvili about the General Starting Point of the Epistemological and Moral Reflection]. Available at: http://mamardashvili.com/about/regnier/1.html (accessed 09.03.2016).

13. Podoroga V. Nitsshe: formula smerti Boga [Nietzsche: Formula of the Death of God]. Available at: http://theoryandpractice.ru/videos/933-valeriy-podoroga-nitsshe-formula-smerti-boga (accessed 10.03.2016).

14. Dubrovskii D.I. Biologicheskie korni antropologicheskogo krizisa. Chto dal’she? [Biological Roots of the Anthropological Crisis. What Is Next?], Chelovek [Human], 2012, no. 6, pp. 51—54.

15. Yudin B.G. Sotvorenie transcheloveka [Creation of Trans Man], Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2007, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 520—527.

16. Yudin B.G. Transgumanizm: sverkhgumanizm ili antigumanizm? [Transhumanism: beyond Humanism or Anti-Humanism?], Bioetika i gumanitarnaya ekspertiza [Bioethics and Humanitarian Expertise], 2013, issue 7, pp. 10—24.