Interference of the Visual and the Kinestetic in the Postnonclassical Art

The Double-Post culture, which is based on the digital “Grand Style”, is noted for its special kine(sthe)tic format, characterized by the virtualization of the spatial, the tactile, and the corporal. Dominance of the visual part generates the person’s desire for a physical experience of the world’s tangibility and own corporality. Overcoming of the lack of tactile in culture comes either through the actualization of direct kinesthetic experience or by means of the indirect visual kinesthetic. The postnonclassical art (the media art, labyrinth-installations, mirrored rooms) offers some previously impossible ways of perception, construction and physical exploration of the multi-dimensional visual reality. The tactile and kinesthetic sensations begin to play the role of an “augmented” virtuality in the viewer-participant’s communication with the intangible, visual spaces and images. Therewith, the kinesthetic and the visual create the counter “flows” of sensory perception, which intersect, overlap and interfere, forming some fundamentally new spatiality and imagery. Due to the interference of the visual and the kinesthetic, the postnonclassical artworks obtain some sophisticatedly dissected fractal spaces that give to a person the fullness of the bodily presence through the simultaneous co-existence of the person’s physical body and an infinite set of mutually exclusive physical reflections to be experienced in the format of indirect visual kinesthetic. The article examines the history of labyrinths and mirrored rooms from the viewpoint of cultural studies and analyzes the media performances by Ph. Decouflé, Ch. Sandison, the Cloud Gate theatre and others, the movies with the plot or composition connected with a labyrinth (“The Cube”, “The Maze Runner”, etc.), and the art installations with mirrored rooms by L. Samaras, Y. Kusama, T. Frank, S. Salat and others.

postnonclassical art, the visual, the kinesthetic, visual kinesthetics, fractality, digital art, labyrinth, mirrored room, augmented virtuality, art installations, cinematography

1. Moles A. Sotsiodinamika kul’tury [Sociodynamics of culture]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2005, 416 p.

2. Zolli A. Pixel Culture, American Demographics, 2004, vol. 6, p. 44.

3. Deleuze G., Guattari F. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London, New York, Continum, 2002, 632 p.

4. Prigogine I., Stengers I. Order out of chaos. Man’s new dialog with nature. Toronto, New York, London, Sydney, Bantam New Age Books, 1984, 349 p.

5. Mandelbrot B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York, Henry Holt and Company, 1983, 468 p.

6. Nikolaeva E.V. Fraktal’nye urovni i patterny kul’tury [Fractal levels and culture patterns], Voprosy kul’turologii [Russian Studies in Culturology], 2013, no. 11, pp. 55—59.

7. Man’kovskaya N.B. Kineticheskoye iskusstvo [The kinetic art], Kul’turologiya XX vek: Entsiklopediya [Cultural Studies 20th century. Encyclopedia]. St. Petersburg, Universitetskaya kniga Publ.; Aleteiya Publ., 1998, vol. 1, pp. 303—304.

8. Meshcheryakov B.G., Zinchenko V.P. (eds.) Bol’shoi psikhologicheskii slovar’ [The Great Psychological Dictionary]. Moscow, AST Publ.; St. Petersburg, Praim-Evroznak Publ., 2006, 672 p.

9. Osmolovskaya I.M. Naglyadnye metody obucheniya [Visual teaching methods]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2009, 192 p.

10. Sal’nikova E.V. Fenomen vizual’nogo [The phenomenon of the visual]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2012, 576 p.

11. Nikolaeva E.V. (transl.) Fraktaly kak iskusstvo [Fractals as art. Digest]. Saint-Petersburg: Strata Publ., 2015, 224 p.

12. Feder J. Fraktaly [Fractals]. Moscow: Mir, 1991, 254 p.

13. Nikolaeva E.V. Fraktal’nye modeli gorodskogo prostranstva [Fractal patterns of the city space], Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2013, no. 1, pp. 13—20.

14. Lieser W. Digital Art. Tandem Verlag GmbH, H.F. Ullmann Publ., 2009, 288 p.

15. Williams L.S. Cloud Gate Dance Theatre of Taiwan: Moon Water. Available at: http://gapersblock.com/ac/2010/01/22/cloud-gate-dance-theatre-of-taiwan-moon-water/ (accessed 19.01.2016).

16. Melchior-Bonnet S. Istoriya zerkala [Histoire du Miroire]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ, 2005, 456 p.

17. Leonardo da Vinci. Suzhdenie o nauke i iskusstve [The judgement about science and art]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-klassika Publ., 2010, 224 p. (in Russ.).

18. Pendergrast M. Mirror, Mirror: A History of the Human Love Affair with Reflection. New York, Basic Books, 2003, 416 p.

19. Saward J. The Origins of Mirror & Wooden Panel Mazes. Caerdroia, 2008, vol. 37, pp. 4—12.

20. Salynskii D.A. (ed.) Fil’m Andreya Tarkovskogo “Colyaris”: materialy i dokumenty [The film “Solyaris” by Andrey Tarkovsky: Materials and documents]. Moscow, Astreya Publ., 2012, 416 p.

21. Coulthart J. The Art of Yayoi Kusama. Available at: http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2006/11/26/the-art-of-yayoi-kusama/ (accessed 19.01.2016).

22. Nikolaeva E.V. Fraktal’nye refleksii v kineticheskom iskusstve: (kul’turologicheskii analiz) [Fractal reflections in kinetic art: a cultural analysis], Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A. Nekrasova [Herald of Nekrasov Kostroma State University], 2013, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 202—205.

23. Filipetti J. Serge Salat: Beyond Infinity Immersive Installation. Available at: http://www.designboom.com/art/serge-salat-beyond-infinity-immersive-installation/ (accessed 19.01.2016).