Social, Collective, and Cultural Memory: a New Approach to the Definition of the Semantic Borders of Concepts
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-1-4-11
Abstract
This article is devoted to the analysis of the phenomenon of memory, considered through its overindividual, social dimension. The main reasons for this issue to become actual in the last decades are connected with the identity crisis, crisis of information, crisis of tradition, and crisis of the memory itself. All the variety of the author’s concepts of memory can be divided into four approaches, within the frameworks of which, the memory is considered either as an archive of the information significant for a group, or as an activity for inter-generational broadcasting of this information, or as a unity of both, or as a certain fictitious, nonexistent in reality, symbolic construction. This variety of research interpretations of the phenomenon of memory comes, among other things, from the lack of a clear basis for identification of any type of memory. The article proposes a solution of this problem through justification of the semantic borders lying between the social, collective, and cultural memory.
References
1. Assmann J. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Moscow, Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury Publ., 2004, 368 p. (in Russ.).
2. Likhachev D.S. Iskusstvo pamyati i pamyat’ iskusstva [The Art of Memory and the Memory of Art], Kritika i vremya: literaturno-kriticheskii sbornik [Criticism and Time: the Literary Criticism Collection]. Leningrad, Lenizdat Publ., 1984, pp. 68—74.
3. Megill A. Istoricheskaya epistemologiya: nauchnaya monografiya [Historical Epistemology: the Scientifi c Monograph]. Moscow, “Kanon+” ROOI “Reabilitatsiya” Publ., 2007, 480 p.
4. Nora P. Frantsiya-pamyat’ [France-Memory]. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta Publ., 1999, 333 p.
5. Szurek J.-Ch. Pamyat’ i totalitarizm: frantsuzskie debaty [Memory and Totalitarianism: the French Debate], Neprikosnovennyi zapas [Debates on Politics and Culture], 2002, no. 2(22), pp. 51—57. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2002/22/shurek.html (accessed 20.10.2016).
6. Savelyeva I.M., Poletaev A.V. Istoricheskaya pamyat’: k voprosu o granitsakh ponyatiya [Historical Memory: to the Question of the Borders of a Concept], Fenomen proshlogo [The Phenomenon of the Past]. Moscow, GU VShE Publ., 2005, pp. 170—221.
7. Hartog F. Vremya i istoriya: “Kak pisat’ istoriyu Frantsii?” [Time and History: “How to Write the History of France?”], “Annaly” na rubezhe vekov: Antologiya [“Annals” at the Turn of the Century: the Anthology]. Moscow, XXI Vek — Soglasie Publ., 2002, 312 p.
8. Kalinin I.A. Perestroika pamyati [Restructuring Memory], Neprikosnovennyi zapas [Debates on Politics and Culture], 2009, no. 2(64). Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2009/2/ka17-pr.html (accessed 16.10.2016).
9. Schütz A. Struktura povsednevnogo myshleniya [Structure of the Everyday Thinking], Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 1988, no. 2, pp. 131—141.
10. Vasilyev A.G. Teoriya sotsial’noi pamyati Abi Varburga [Aby Warburg’s Theory of Social Memory], Filosofi ya i teoriya iskusstva. Estetika. Kritika iskusstvoznaniya [Philosophy and Theory of Art. Aesthetics. Criticism of Art History], 2009, no. 1—2, pp. 24—37.
11. Ricœur P. La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli. Moscow, Gumanitarnoi Literatury Publ., 2004, 728 p. (in Russ.).
12. Durkheim E. Les formes élémentaries de la vie religieuse, Mistika. Religiya. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. Antologiya [Mysticism. Religion. Science. The Classics of World Religious Studies. The Anthology]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 1998, pp. 174—231 (in Russ.).
13. Geary P. Pamyat’ [Memory], Slovar’ srednevekovoi kul’tury [The Dictionary of Medieval Culture]. Moscow, Versiya-A Publ., 2003, pp. 342—348.
14. Halbwachs M. Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Moscow, Novoe Izdatel’stvo Publ., 2007, 348 p. (in Russ.).
15. Berger P., Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on sociology of Knowledge. Moscow, Vektor Publ., 2008, 422 p. (in Russ.).
16. Assmann A. Transformatsii novogo rezhima vremeni [Transformations of the Modern Time Regime], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Observer], 2012, no. 116, pp. 16—31. Available at: http://magazines.russ. ru/nlo/2012/116/a4.html (accessed 18.10.2016).
17. Le Goff J. History and Memory. Moscow, Rossiiskaya Politicheskaya Entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN) Publ., 2013, 303 p. (in Russ.).
18. Shkuratov V.A. Istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Historical Psychology]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 2002, 342 p.
19. Lotman Yu.M. Pamyat’ v kul’turologicheskom osveshchenii [Memory in the Cultural Lighting], Izbrannye stat’i. T. 1 [Selected Articles. Vol. 1]. Tallinn, Veles Publ., 1992, pp. 200—202.
20. Hutton P. History as an Art of Memory. St. Petersburg, “Vladimir Dal’” Publ., 2004, 362 p.
21. Rutkevich A.M. Psikhoanaliz, istoriya, travmirovannaya “pamyat’” [Psychoanalysis, History, Traumatized “Memory”], Fenomen proshlogo [The Phenomenon of the Past]. Moscow, GU VShE Publ., 2005, pp. 242—261.
22. Moscovici S. Sotsial’noe predstavlenie: istoricheskii vzglyad [Social Representations: the Historical View], Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 1995, vol. 1, no. 1. Available at: http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/uem/ido/psix_lich/ch10_1.html (accessed 18.10.2016).
23. Shulgovsky V.V. Fiziologiya vysshei nervnoi deyatel’nosti s osnovami neirobiologii [Physiology of the Higher Nervous Activity with the Basics of Neurobiology]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2008, 528 p.
24. Nurkova V.V. Obshchaya psikhologiya. Pamyat’. T. 3 [General Psychology. Memory. Vol. 3]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2006, 320 p.
Review
For citations:
Shub M.L. Social, Collective, and Cultural Memory: a New Approach to the Definition of the Semantic Borders of Concepts. Observatory of Culture. 2017;14(1):4-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-1-4-11
Views:
2436
Email this article 