PUSHKIN AS A “CONNOISSEUR OF LIFE”: THE MAIN PROFILES IN THE AMALGAM OF PUSHKIN’S PHILOSOPHICAL PREFERENCES
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-2-206-213
Abstract
The article studies the outlined by previous researchers range of statements and characteristics from A.S. Pushkin’s works, which relate to the worldview ideas, principles and meanings taking place in Pushkin’s period. The subject of the study is their philosophical component.
The author carries out a value differentiation of A.S. Pushkin’s philosophical preferences in the context of the worldview interests of his era, and defines their main profiles as “familiar”, “unacceptable” and “neutral”.
The article uses analysis and scientific reflection as methodological tools, and for its empirical material, it takes works of the specialists in different areas of the Humanities, devoted to this topic. The provided analytical and reflexive material is structured by means of typification and classification, which allows the author to investigate the logic of the worldview and ideological evolution of the poet and the role of philosophy in it, and to offer his own interpretation of this. The author also contributes to the development of this topic with the argumentation of the hypothesis of originality of the artistic reflection and reflexivity (in comparison with the philosophical reflection and reflexivity).
About the Author
Vladimir I. KrasikovRussian Federation
Vladimir I. Krasikov
6, Malyi Kislovsky Lane, Moscow, 125009
References
1. Frank S. On the Tasks of Pushkin Comprehension, Russkoe mirovozzrenie [Russian Worldview]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1996, 738 p. (in Russ.).
2. Pustovit A.V. Pushkin i zapadnoevropeiskaya filosofskaya traditsiya [Pushkin and the Western European Philosophical Tradition]. Kiev, “Personal” Publ., 2015, 408 p.
3. Kibalnik S.A. Khudozhestvennaya filosofiya Pushkina [Pushkin’s Artistic Philosophy]. St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin Publ., 1998, 199 p.
4. Krylatye slova: Entsiklopediya [Winged Words: Encyclopedia]. Moscow, Lokid-Press Publ., 2003, 831 p.
5. Agaltsev A.M. Pushkin’s Real Metaphysics as the Essential Base of the Formation of a Ternary Culture of Russia, Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Herald of Omsk University], 2015, no. 4 (78), pp. 79—84 (in Russ.).
6. Tsyavlovsky M.A. (ed.) Letopis’ zhizni i tvorchestva A.S. Pushkina. 1799—1826 [The Chronicle of A.S. Pushkin’s Life and Work. 1799—1826]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1991, 785 p.
7. Davydov A.P. A.S. Pushkin. Strannik (“Odnazhdy stranstvuya sredi doliny dikoi…”) i kommentarii k nemu F.M. Dostoevskogo [A.S. Pushkin. The “Piligrim” and a Commentary to It by F.M. Dostoevsky], Kul’tura i iskusstvo [Culture and Art], 2014, no. 2 (20), pp. 197—205 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/2222—1956.2014.2.12296.
8. Syrov V.N. Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii: svoeobrazie istoricheskoi mysli [Introduction to the Philosophy of History: The Peculiarity of Historical Thought]. Moscow, Vodolei Publishers, 2006, 248 p.
9. Gobozov I.A. Pushkin — The Universal Genius, Philosophy and Society, 2012, no. 3 (67), pp. 5—20. Available at: http://www.socionauki.ru/journal/articles/145243/ (accessed 07.06.2017) (in Russ.).
10. Yakubovich D.P. Antiquity in the Works of Pushkin, Ruthenia: website. Available at: http://www.ruthenia.ru/document/527776.html (accessed 07.06.2017) (in Russ.).
11. Lukov V.A. Pushkin: Russian “Universalness”, Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 2007, no. 2, pp. 58—73 (in Russ.).
12. Bazhenov A. Coming to Hell as a Creative Task of Pushkin (On Gavriiliada), Nash sovremennik [Our Contemporary], 2002, no. 1, pp. 55—57 (in Russ.).
13. Pustovit A.V. Philosopher Pushkin. The Poet’s Legacy and the Western European Philosophical Tradition, Pushkinskaya komissiya IMLI RAN: sait [Pushkin Commission of the Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences: website]. Available at: http://pushkinopen.ru/texts/view/41 (accessed 06.06.2017) (in Russ.).
14. Odoevsky V.F. Mnemozina: sobranie sochinenii v stikhakh i proze [Mnemozina: Collected Works in Verse and Prose], part 4. Moscow, Imperatorskogo Moskovskogo Teatra Publ., 1825.
15. Peskov A.M. At the Origins of Russian Philosophy, Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 1994, no. 5, pp. 89—100 (in Russ.).
16. Neshitov P.Yu. The Formula of Russian Philosophy: Hegel plus Pushkin: The Report of December 23, 2011, at the Historical-Methodological Seminar “Russian Thought” in the Russian Christian Humanities Academy, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Available at: http://www.hegel.ru/neshitov.html (accessed 07.06.2017) (in Russ.).
17. Belyi A.A. Kant’s Quote in Pushkin’s Text, Voprosy literatury [Russian Studies in Literature], 2004, no. 3, pp. 59—80 (in Russ.).
18. Foucault M. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. St. Petersburg, A-cad Publ., AOZT “Talisman” Publ., 1994, 406 p. (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Krasikov V.I. PUSHKIN AS A “CONNOISSEUR OF LIFE”: THE MAIN PROFILES IN THE AMALGAM OF PUSHKIN’S PHILOSOPHICAL PREFERENCES. Observatory of Culture. 2018;15(2):206-213. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-2-206-213