INCLUSION AS A VALUE CORE OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUMANISM
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-1-21-31
Abstract
Sociocultural transformations that affect today all layers of human existence exacerbate the problem of including the Other into the social life. Inclusion — a new phenomenon of culture — appears as a response to the intolerant attitude of a person to another person. The need for cultural philosophical reflection on inclusion predetermines the relevance of this work. Inclusive practices, whose common understanding draws attention to the destructive nature of social interaction of the society and the individual with disabilities, require a revision of their sense-forming coordinates.
The renewed understanding of inclusion as the nucleus of the philosophy of humanism expands the scope of the view that technologies the society uses for satisfying special sociocultural and educational needs should be addressed to people with disabilities, shifting the emphasis towards recognizing the “singularity” / uniqueness of each individual for the further development of human civilization. The author’s approach, giving everyone unlimited opportunities for self-fulfillment, immerses a person into the amazing mystery of creativity, striving to create the joy of co-existence. Emphasis is placed on the understanding that creativity is a process of social interaction, where deprivation of the supremacy of the competition and effectiveness paradigms prevailing in the modern society contributes to overcoming the negative practices of self-awareness / accepting the Other as a carrier of abnormality, as well as to affirming the importance of the individual’s “singularity”/ uniqueness for the social well-being of people and society. The presented approach to inclusion, accumulating the conceptual ideas of the philosophy of humanism, allows a person to discover a unique beginning in themselves, which promotes both the socialization of the personality and the acquisition of new reasons for existence. Appealing to the latest research in the field of neurobiology proving the social nature of man is dictated by the insufficient attention of the modern society to education of a socially responsible person. The social fullness of a person’s life, leading to the assertion of one’s own unique nature by including in the process of co-creation, contributing to the overcoming of the life meaning search crisis, harmonizes the vital activity of all social institutions, including those in the scale of humanity.
Keywords
About the Author
Natalia E. SudakovaRussian Federation
Natalia E. Sudakova
Department of UNESCO, Doctoral Candidate, SPIN: 8867-9638
References
1. Kurtz P. Infomedia Revolution and the Prospects of the Planetary Humanism, Zdravyi smysl [Common Sense], 2002, no. 3 (24), pp. 3—8 (in Russ.).
2. Kurtz P. Humanism and Skepticism — The Cultural Paradigms of the Third Millennium, Zdravyi smysl [Common Sense], 2000, no. 17 (in Russ.). Available at: http://humanism.al.ru/ru/magazine.phtml?issue=2000.17-01 (accessed 28.12.2017).
3. Sudakova N.E. Filosofiya inklyuzii: puti v prinimayushchee obshchestvo [Philosophy of Inclusion: Pathways to the Host Society], Muzyka v informatsionnom prostranstve kul’tury tret’ego tysyacheletiya: problemy, mneniya, perspektivy: sb. nauch. tr. [Music in the Information Space of the Culture of the Third Millennium: Problems, Opinions, Perspectives: collected scientific works]. Moscow, RGSU Publ., 2012, issue VII, pp. 160—164.
4. Shemanov A.Yu., Vostrov I.M., Egorova V.A. Creative Activity and Inclusion, Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology], 2013, no. 3, pp. 5—18 (in Russ.).
5. Shemanov A.Yu. Inclusion Policy and Ethnic Identity in the Context of Openness to the Other, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2016, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 652—659 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2016-13-6-652-659.
6. Kudishina A.A. Gumanizm — fenomen sovremennoi kul’tury [Humanism Is a Phenomenon of Modern Culture]. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2005, 504 p.
7. Boris Krivoshei — “Khochu zhit’ zavtra” [Boris Krivoshei — “I Want to Live Tomorrow”], Sankt-Peterburskaya assotsiatsiya obshchestvennykh ob’’edinenii roditelei detei-invalidov “GAOORDI” [St. Petersburg Association of Public Obligations of Parents of Children with Disabilities “GAOORDI”]. Available at: http://gaoordi.ru/boris-krivoshej-hochu-zhit-zavtra/ (accessed 28.12.2017).
8. Nesushchestvuyushchii narod Borisa Krivosheya [The Nonexistent People of Boris Krivoshei], Planeta — Rossiiskaya kraudfandingovaya platforma [Planeta — Russian Crowdfunding Platform]. Available at: https://planeta.ru/campaigns/krivoshey (accessed 28.12.2017).
9. Kondakov I.V., Sokolov K.B., Khrenov N.A. Tsivilizatsionnaya identichnost’ v perekhodnuyu epokhu: kul’turologicheskii, sotsiologicheskii i iskusstvovedcheskii aspekty [Civilization Identity in the Transition Period: Culturological, Sociological and Art Aspects]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2011, 1024 p.
10. Astafyeva O.N. Kul’turnaya politika: dinamika teoreticheskikh podkhodov i fundamental’nykh kontseptualizatsii [Cultural Policy: Dynamics of Theoretical Approaches and Fundamental Conceptualizations], Istoricheskie povoroty kul’tury: sb. nauch. st. (k 70-letiyu prof. I.V. Kondakova) [Historical Twists of Culture: collected scientific articles]. Moscow, Soglasie Publ., 2018, pp. 86—102.
11. Epshtein M.N. Transkul’tura i transtsendentsiya: lichnost’ i veshch’ kak stranniki v inoe [Transculture and Transcendence: The Person and the Thing as Travellers into the Different], I.M. Bolotnikov. Tol’ko unikal’noe global’no: lichnost’ i upravlenie: kul’tura i obrazovanie: sb.statei v chest’ 60-letiya prof. G.L. Tul’chinskogo [I.M. Bolotnikov. Only the Unique Is Global. Personality and Management. Culture and Education: collected articles in honor of the 60th anniversary of prof. G.L. Tulchinsky]. St. Petersburg, SPbGUKI Publ., 2007, pp. 90—102.
12. Astafyeva O.N., Belyakova I.G., Sudakova N.E. Theoretical Studies of Mass Culture as a Self-Developing System in the Context of the Tasks of Russia’s Cultural Policy, Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2017, vol. 12, no. 7b. Interdisciplinary Perspective on Sciences, pp. 1475—1481. DOI: 10.12973/ejac.2017.00275a.
13. Banerji M., Dailey R. A Study of the Effects of an Inclusion Model on Students with Specific Learning Disabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1995, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 511—522.
14. Corbett J. Inclusive Education and School Culture, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1999, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53—61.
15. Bennett T., Deluca D., Bruns D. Putting Inclusion into Practice: Perspectives of Teachers and Parents, Exceptional Children, 1997, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 115—131. DOI: 10.1177/001440299706400108.
16. Alur M., Hegarty S. (eds). Education & Children with Special Needs: From Segregation to Inclusion. Thousand Oaks (CA, USA), Sage Publications, Inc., 2002, 220 p.
17. Malofeev N.N. A Laudatory Word for Inclusion or a Speech of Self-Defense, Al’manakh instituta korrektsionnoi pedagogiki [Almanac of the Institute of Special Education], 2011, no. 15, pp. 3—14 (in Russ.).
18. Astafyeva O.N., Sinetsky S.B. Philosophical and Applied Aspects of Cultural Policy at the Settlement Level, Vestnik kul’tury i iskusstv [Culture and Arts Herald], 2017, no. 4(52), pp. 70—80 (in Russ.).
19. Malofeev N.N., Shmatko N.D. Basic Models of Integrated Learning, Defektologiya [Defectology], 2008, no. 6, pp. 71—78 (in Russ.).
20. World Report on Disability 2011, World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf (accessed 28.12.2017).
21. Shemanov A.Yu. Samoidentifikatsiya cheloveka i kul’tura: monografiya [Human Self-Identification and Culture]. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2007, 479 p.
22. Astafyeva O.N., Reznik Yu.M. Life in the Real and the Real in Life, Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo [Personality. Culture. Society], 2011, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 318—339 (in Russ.).
23. Shapinskaya E.N. Obraz Drugogo v tekstakh kul’tury [The Image of the Other in the Texts of Culture]. Moscow, Krasand Publ., 2012, 216 p.
24. Mandy Harvey: Deaf Singer Earns Simon’s Golden Buzzer With Original Song — America’s Got Talent 2017, YouTube channel “America’s Got Talent”. 2017. 6 June. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKSWXzAnVe0 (accessed 28.12.2017).
25. Evelin Glenni uchit slushat’ [Evelyn Glennie: How to Truly Listen], YouTube channel “TED”. 2007. 14 May. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU3V6zNER4g (accessed 28.12.2017).
26. Sudakova N.E. Philosophical Reflection of Inclusion as a Phenomenon of Modern Culture: Towards the Other, Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice], 2016, no. 11-1(73), pp. 152—154 (in Russ.).
27. Bauer J. Printsip chelovechnosti: pochemu my po svoei prirode sklonny k kooperatsii [The Principle of Humanity: Why We Are Inherently Inclined to Cooperation]. St. Petersburg, Vernera Regena Publ., 2009, 150 p.
28. Dorozhkin A.M., Timofeeva O.V. Special Aspects of the Transferring of Inner Values, Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial’nye nauki [Bulletin of the Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences], 2014, no. 2(34), pp. 169—174 (in Russ.).
29. Frankl V. Man’s Search for Meaning. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, 368 p. (in Russ.).
30. Sudakova N.E., Sapelnikov D.S., Popova M.V. Tvorchestvo v kontekste kul’turfilosofskogo osmysleniya i pedagogicheskogo modelirovaniya mirovozzreniya lichnosti: monografiya [Creativity in the Context of Cultural Philosophical Understanding and Pedagogical Modeling of the Worldview of the Individual: monograph]. Moscow, Buki-Vedi Publ., 2016, 184 p.
31. Kravchenko S.A. (ed.) “Normal’naya anomiya” v Rossii i sovremennom mire: kollekt. monografiya [“Normal Anomie” in Russia and the Modern World: collective monograph]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ., 2017, 281 p.
32. Mezhuev V.M. Ideya kul’tury: ocherki po filosofii kul’tury [The Idea of Culture: Essays on the Philosophy of Culture]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2006, 408 p.
33. Reshetnikov V.A. Specificity of Modern Humanism as Culture, Sovremennyi gumanizm: problemy i perspektivy [Modern Humanism: Problems and Prospects]. Irkutsk, Irkutskogo Universiteta Publ., 2004, pp. 227—246 (in Russ.).
34. Istoriya ROOI “Kovcheg” [The History of ROOI “Kovcheg”], Regional’naya obshchestvennaya organizatsiya invalidov i roditelei detei-invalidov “Kovcheg” (ROOI “Kovcheg”) [Regional Public Organization for Disabled People and Parents of Disabled Children “Kovcheg” (ROOI “Kovcheg”)]. Available at: http://xn--80aedhxqj7ef.xn--p1ai/history.html (accessed 28.12.2017).
35. Shemanov A.Yu., Makaeva D.E. Creativity and Inclusive Culture of the Educational Organization, Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education www.psyedu.ru], 2016, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 24—34 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2016080103.
Review
For citations:
Sudakova N.E. INCLUSION AS A VALUE CORE OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUMANISM. Observatory of Culture. 2018;15(1):21-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-1-21-31