THE HERITAGE OF RUDOLF OTTO IN PHENOMENOLOGY OF CULTURE
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-1-4-12
Abstract
1917 was a turning point not only in histories of many countries but also in the spiritual culture cognition, because in that year the book “The Idea of the Holy” (Das Heilige) of the Lutheran theologian Rudolf Otto became known. This book interprets the religion, in a Kantian-phenomenological way, as a stable relation of a living entity and the being, and it cannot be explained, for it is a mystery. R. Otto is a key figure not only in philosophy of religion but also in phenomenology. His phenomenological teaching is considered as a methodology for cultural stereotypes transcending. The relevance of the topic is determined by theoretical, practical and global aspects: 1) a hundred years is a significant period for summing up the results of the work’s intellectual history; 2) Otto’s method can be recommended for managing the ethnoconfessional diversity; 3) the ethos of intercultural communication requires today a vision of unity, rather than differences. The novelty of the study is in generalization of the impact of Otto’s book on the subsequent philosophy and cultural studies.
The author follows the position that Otto’s phenomenology has not reached its limits, and actualizes this theoretical method as a means of intercultural communication. The article gives an assessment of Otto’s teachings by Russian and foreign thinkers, and examines the concepts of the numinous and the Other.
About the Author
Elena A. TimoshchukRussian Federation
59A, Gorkogo Str., Vladimir, 600017
References
1. Otto R. Svyashchennoe. Ob irratsional’nom v idee bozhestvennogo i ego sootnoshenii s ratsional’nym [The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and its Relation to the Rational]. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskii Universitet Publ., 2008, 272 p.
2. Otto R. Autobiographical Materials, Religiovedenie [Religious Studies], 2004, no. 3, pp. 125—132 (in Russ.).
3. On the Way to “The Holy”: The Letters of Rudolf Otto, Religiovedenie [Religious Studies], 2004, no. 4, pp. 140—145 (in Russ.).
4. On the Way to “The Holy”: The Letters of Rudolf Otto, Religiovedenie [Religious Studies], 2005, no. 1, pp. 141—144 (in Russ.).
5. Zabiyako A.P. Religiya: opyt ponimaniya i tipologii [Religion: The Experience of Understanding and Typology]. Available at: http://religious.life/2013/03/zabiyako-religiya-opyit-ponimaniya-i-tipologii/ (accessed 05.08.2017).
6. Zabiyako A.P. Numinous, Sacred, Kul’turologiya XX vek. Entsiklopediya: v 2 t. [Cultural Studies of the 20th Century. Encyclopedia: in 2 volumes]. Moscow, 1996, vol. 1, pp. 101, vol. 2, pp. 145—147 (in Russ.).
7. Zabiyako A.P. Numinous, Novaya filos. entsikl.: v 4 t. [New Philosophical Encyclopedia: in 4 volumes]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 2010, vol. 3, pp. 482—483 (in Russ.).
8. Zabiyako A.P. Saint, Holy, Sacred, Religiovedenie: entsikl. slovar’ [Religious Studies: Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2006, pp. 962—963 (in Russ.).
9. Pylaev M.A. Philosophy of Religion in Rudolf Otto’s Phenomenology of Religion, Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Ser. I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiya [St. Tikhon’s University Review. Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies], 2011, issue 6 (38), pp. 59—74 (in Russ.).
10. Zenkin S.N. Nebozhestvennoe sakral’noe: teoriya i khudozhestvennaya praktika [Unholy sacral: theory and artistic practice]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2012, 536 p.
11. Frolov A.V. Hermeneutical Approaches to “The Idea of the Holy” by R. Otto, Filosofiya religii: al’manakh (2010—2011) [Philosophy of Religion: Almanac (2010—2011)]. Moscow, 2011, pp. 429—442 (in Russ.).
12. Otto R. The Philosophy of Religion Based on Kant and Fries. New York, 1931, 232 p. Available at: https://archive.org/details/philosophyofreli009869mbp (accessed 06.11.2017).
13. Chantepie de la Saussaye P.D. Lehrbuch der Religionsgeschichte. Freiburg im Breisgau, Leipzig, 1897, 400 p. Available at: https://archive.org/details (accessed 06.11.2017).
14. Scheler M. Vom Ewigen im Menschen. Leipzig, 1921, 726 p. Available at: https://archive.org/details (accessed 06.11.2017).
15. Husserl E. Brief an R. Otto vom 5.03.1919, Schütte H.W. Religion und Christentum in der Theologie Rudolf Ottos. Berlin, 1969, pp. 139—142. Available at: https://books.google.ru/books?id=AW1IAAAAMAAJ (accessed 02.02.2018).
16. Shokhin V.K. Teologiya: vvedenie v bogoslovskie distsipliny. [Theology: The Introduction to Theological Disciplines].Moscow, 2002, 122 p. (in Russ.).
17. Pylaev M.A. The Conception of Understanding the Holy in Phenomenology of Religion (G. van der Leeuw, J. Wach), Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Ser. I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiya [St. Tikhon’s University Review. Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies]. Moscow, 2008, no. 4, pp. 84—102 (in Russ.).
18. Zabiyako A.P. Sacred as a Category of M. Eliade’s Phenomenology of Religion, Religiovedenie [Religious Studies], 2002, no. 3, pp. 133—138 (in Russ.).
19. Eliade M. Aziatskaya alkhimiya: sb. esse [Asian Alchemy: collected essays]. Moscow, Yanus-K Publ., 1998, 604 p.
20. Eliade M. Selected Works. Essays on Comparative Religious Studies. Moscow, Ladomir Publ., 1999, 488 p. (in Russ.).
21. Pakhomov S.V. Eliade and Yoga, M. Eliade. Ioga: bessmertie i svoboda [M. Eliade. Yoga: Immortality and Freedom]. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet Publ., 2004, pp. 3—56.
22. Lebedev M.V., Timoshchuk A.S., Timoshchuk E.A. Phenomenology as a Cross-Cultural Bridge between East and West, Khora. Zhurnal sovremennoi zarubezhnoi filosofii i filosofskoi komparativistiki [Khora. The Journal of Modern Foreign Philosophy and Philosophical Comparative Studies], 2008, no. 1, pp. 18—27 (in Russ.).
23. Poluektov A.A. Phenomenological (Theological) Interpretation of Religiousness, Religioznost’: fenomen i ego izmereniya [Religiousness: The Phenomenon and its Dimensions]. Vladimir, Vladimirskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet im. A.G. i N.G. Stoletovykh (VlGU) Publ., 2012, pp. 56—61 (in Russ.).
24. Dworkin R. Religion without God, Harvard University Press, 2013, 192 p.
25. Otto R. Religiöser Menschheitsbund neben politischem Völkerbund, Die christliche Welt 34 (1920), pp. 133—135.
26. Alles G. Rudolf Otto and the politics of Utopia, Religion, 1991, 21(3), pp. 235—256.
27. Obergethmann F. Rudolf Ottos «Religiöser Menschheitsbund» — ein Kapitel interreligiöser Begegnung zwischen den Weltkriegen, Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft, 1998, no. 6, pp. 79—106.
28. Letters of C. G. Jung: Vol. I, 1906—1950. Routledge Publ., 2015, 634 p.
29. Stein M. The Role of Numinous Experience of the Individuation, Chapter 2. Printsip individuatsii. O razvitii chelovecheskogo soznaniya [The Principle of Individuation: Toward the Development of Human Consciousness]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2009, 175 p. (in Russ.).
30. Burlo N.N. The Concept of the “Collective Unconscious” in the Scientific Heritage of K.G. Jung, Sotsial’no-gumanitarnyi vestnik. Ezhegodnik 2012 Krasnodarskogo regional’nogo otdeleniya Rossiiskogo filosofskogo obshchestva [Socio-Humanitarian Bulletin. Yearbook 2012 of the Krasnodar Regional Branch of the Russian Philosophical Society]. Krasnodar, Ros. Filos. Org. Publ., 2013, pp. 55—59 (in Russ.).
31. Chernikova V.E., Dinaeva L. Carl Gustav Jung and his Study of the Collective Unconscious, Alleya nauki [Alley of Science], 2017, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 818—822 (in Russ.).
32. Mohn J. Die Religion der Religionswissenschaft und die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft: eine Replik, Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik, 2012, vol. 23, issue 2, pp. 306—320.
Review
For citations:
Timoshchuk E.A. THE HERITAGE OF RUDOLF OTTO IN PHENOMENOLOGY OF CULTURE. Observatory of Culture. 2018;15(1):4-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-1-4-12