Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

Opera and “Director’s” Theatre of the 21st Century

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-3-272-281

Abstract

The article raises the issues of interaction between modern direction and the musical text of opera. Researches of foreign and domestic scientists in the fi eld of theatre studies and musicology allow analyzing a musical performance as an independent text, in which there is an interchange between different types of art. The author focuses on the opera as a dialogue between music and theater. The author proposes three main forms of the dialogue for consideration: the director and the composer, the director and the viewer, the director and the actor. The article expresses the opinion that, in the process of interaction between the director and the opera text, some myths appeared and started to impede the development of this process and to cause confl ict situations while analyzing the fi nal results. Among those kinds of myths, the author reckons the idea of director-conceptualist as the destroyer of the composer’s idea, the unconditional defi nition of this idea, and the so-called “reverse logic” of feeling and action in musical theater. Observing the functioning of each of these myths on concrete examples, the author comes to conclusion on the necessity to “debunk” them for further successful development of musical theater. From this position, the article analyzes fragments from operas by Russian and foreign composers and their stage impersonations. In the dialogue “director—viewer”, two main ways of the participants’ interaction are defi ned: the theater as a form of escapism and the theater as a “catalyst” of intelligence. The author emphasizes the need to have both the ways, so that the viewer should be able to choose. The author considers the relations between the director and the actor to be the most positive for the modern theatre, which led to the emergence of a new type of performer on the modern opera stage: singerartist, who fully owns the acting technique of “internal action”. The article concludes that there is an ambiguous, but rather perspective and positive situation in the modern musical theater, which determines further ways of the genre’s development.

About the Author

Marina Ya. Kuklinskaya
G.P. Vishnevskaya College of Music and Theatre Arts
Russian Federation


References

1. Fischer-Lichte E. Ästhetik des Performativen. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag, 2004, 378 p.

2. Dimitrin Yu. Opera on the Operating Table, Ope­raNews: Vse ob opere v Rossii i za rubezhom [Ope­raNews: Everything about Opera in Russia and Abroad]. Available at: http://www.operanews.ru/13092209.html (accessed 03.04.2018) (in Russ.).

3. Parin A. Pathos is the Main Difference between the Old-Mode Theater and the New One: interview, Zvezda [Star]. Available at: http://zvzda.ru/interviews/12f5ff76eb29 (accessed 03.04.2018) (in Russ.).

4. Biryukova E. Tri geroya moego vremeni [Three Heroes of my Time]. Moscow, Galereya Publ., 2018, 416 p.

5. Hermann M. Bühne und Drama, Vossische Zeitung, 1918, July 30.

6. Fischer-Lichte E. Semiotik des Theaters: in 3 Bände. Tübingen, Narr Publ., 1983, 255 p.

7. Bentley E. The Life of the Drama. New York, Atheneum Publ., 1967, 205 p.

8. Lotman Yu. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta [The Structure of Artistic Text]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo—SPb Publ., 1988, 285 p.

9. Sabinina M. Vzaimodeistvie muzykal’nogo i dramaticheskogo teatrov v XX veke [The Interaction between Musical and Drama Theatres in the 20th Century]. Moscow, Kompozitor Publ., 2003, 327 p.

10. Kuklinskaya M. Musical Performance as the Subject of Musicology, Yuzhnorossiiskii muzykal’nyi al’manakh [South-Russian Musical Anthology], 2018, no. 1, pp. 67—72 (in Russ.).

11. Vagner R. Moya zhizn’. Memuary: v 4 t. [My life. Memoirs: in 4 volumes]. St. Petersburg, Gryadushchii Den’ Publ., 1911, vol. 4, 553 p.

12. Asafyev B. Izbrannye trudy: v 5 t. [Selected Works: in 5 volumes]. Moscow, Akademii Nauk Publ., 1957, vol. 5, 388 p.

13. Kristi G.V., Sobolevskaya O.S. (eds). Stanislavskii — reformator opernogo iskusstva: materialy, dokumenty [Stanislavsky Is a Reformer of the Opera Art: Materials, Documents]. Moscow, Muzyka Publ., 1988, 366 p.

14. Chepinoga A. Deistvennaya intonatsiya v rezhissure i masterstve aktera muzykal’nogo teatra [The Effective Intonation in Directing and Acting of Musical Theater], Cand. art studies diss. Moscow, 2011, 145 p.

15. Akulov E. Opernaya muzyka i stsenicheskoe deistvie [Opera Music and Stage Acting]. Moscow, Kabinetnyi Uchenyi Publ., 2016, 388 p.

16. Pokrovsky B. Ob opernoi rezhissure [On Opera Directing]. Moscow, VTO Publ., 1973, 308 p.

17. Pokrovsky B. Razmyshleniya ob opere [Reflections on Opera]. Moscow, Sovetskii Kompozitor Publ., 1979, 279 p.

18. Krivonogova E. Opera Directing Typology: The Theatre Aspect, Teatr. Zhivopis’. Kino: al’manakh [Theatre. Painting. Cinema: Almanac], 2017, no. 2, pp. 31—50 (in Russ.).

19. Bogatyrev V. Opera Directing and Singer’s Psychotechnics, Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena [Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Science], 2008, no. 10 (59), pp. 284—290 (in Russ.).

20. Kuznetsov N. O masterstve opernogo artista [About the Skill of an Opera Artist]. Moscow, Otkrytaya Stsena Publ., 2011, 225 p.


Review

For citations:


Kuklinskaya M.Ya. Opera and “Director’s” Theatre of the 21st Century. Observatory of Culture. 2018;15(3):272-281. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-3-272-281

Views: 1860


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)