Gothic Revival and the Possibility of “Gothic Survival”
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-5-576-583
Abstract
The notion of “Gothic survival” is still prevalent in literature on Gothic revival architecture in England. This concept implies the possibility of the unreflexive survival of Gothic architectural tradition in some distant provincial regions, where architects, searching connections with the past or folk traditions, could find it. This notion, dating back to the literature of the beginning of the 20th century, can be convincingly refuted by analyzing the meanings and purposes of different stages of Gothic revival. The article aims to demonstrate that the use of Gothic architectural forms in the second half of the 17th — beginning of the 18th century was initiated by intellectuals and had no connection to the preservation of artisan traditions.
The courtiers of Elizabeth I, re-enacting mediaeval romances and Arthurian legends, conducted the earliest known Gothic revival. The relation between Elizabethan architecture and Gothic tradition has been discussed many times. And in later decades — during the Stuart era, the Commonwealth and after the Restoration — Gothic colleges and churches were extensively built.
Basing on the sources available, it can be assumed that, though there was not any chronological break in Gothic architectural tradition, Gothic revival had been ideologically biased from its very beginning. We can also say that the spread of classical architecture in England not only was unable to destroy the Gothic tradition, but also gave it new meanings and almost immediately made any appeal to Gothic forms an ideological statement.
Keywords
About the Author
Vladislav V. DegtyarevRussian Federation
5, Isaakievskaya Sq., St. Petersburg, 190000, Russia
References
1. Brooks C. The Gothic Revival. London, 1999, 448 p.
2. Mikhailova Yu.Yu. Gothic Revival Architecture in England of the 18th—19th Centuries, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gos. un-ta kul’tury i iskusstv [Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg State University of Culture and Arts], 2014, no. 4 (21), pp. 85—89 (in Russ.).
3. Putyatin I.E. Two Patterns of Gothic Style in the Architectural Thinking of the Enlightenment, Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanit. un-ta. Seriya V [St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series V], 2017, issue 25, pp. 65—74 (in Russ.).
4. Vine A. In Defiance of Time: Antiquarian Writing in Early Modern England. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 2010, 264 p.
5. Pushkina A.A. The Gothic Novel and the Genesis of Neo-Gothic Trend in Culture, Vestnik Leningradskogo gos. un-ta im. A.S. Pushkina [Bulletin of the A.S. Pushkin Leningrad State University], 2015, no. 2, pp. 319—330 (in Russ.).
6. Zalomkina G.V. Approaches to Understanding of the Gothic Myth, Vestnik Samarskogo gos. un-ta [Bulletin of the Samara State University], 2010, no. 5 (79), pp. 178—184 (in Russ.).
7. Addison A. Romanticism and the Gothic Revival. New York, 1967, 188 p.
8. Aldrich M. Gothic Revival. London, 1994, 240 p.
9. Lewis M. The Gothic Revival. London, 2002, 208 p.
10. Clark K. The Gothic Revival. An Essay in the History of Taste. New York, 1974, 240 p.
11. Clapham A. The Survival of Gothic in Seventeenth-Century England, The Archaeological Journal, 1952, vol. 106, supplement, pp. 4—9.
12. Colvin H. Gothic Survival and Gothic Revival, Essays in English Architecture. New Haven, London, 1999, pp. 217—244.
13. Pevsner N. An Outline of European Architecture. London, 1990, 496 p.
14. Girouard M. Elizabethan Architecture and the Gothic Tradition, Architectural History, 1963, no. 6, pp. 23—39.
15. McNeill T. Propaganda in Stone: Medieval Style in 17th Century Anglican Churches, Archaeological Journal, 2018, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 362—381.
16. Nesterov A.V. Symbolic Politics. Sir Henry Lee and the Contexts of Elizabethan Period, Koleso Fortuny: reprezentatsiya cheloveka i mira v angliiskoi kul’ture nachala Novogo vremeni [Wheel of Fortune: The Representation of Man and World in the English Culture of the Beginning of the Modern Period]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2015, pp. 237—277 (in Russ.).
17. Worsley G. The Origins of the Gothic Revival: A Reappraisal, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. Sixth Series, 1993, vol. 3, pp. 105—150.
18. Evelyn J. An Account of Architects and Architecture. London, 1723, 74 p.
19. Evelyn J. The diary of John Evelyn. London, New York, 1906, vol. 2, 420 p.
20. Nadel G. Philosophy of History before Historicism, History and Theory, 1964, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 291—315.
21. Lewis C.S. The Discarded Image, Izbrannye raboty po istorii kul’tury [Selected Works on the History of Culture]. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2015, pp. 630—839 (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Degtyarev V.V. Gothic Revival and the Possibility of “Gothic Survival”. Observatory of Culture. 2018;15(5):576-583. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-5-576-583