Science as a Game of Natural Intelligence
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-4-402-412
Abstract
The article is devoted to the theoretical understanding of implementation of the human-sizedness principle within the framework of post-non-classical science. It is interpreted as a new methodological principle that increases the efficiency of modern science. Thus, post-non-classical science is considered as a system of knowledge, closely connected with people, that develops, on the basis of this approach, more complex criteria for assessing the knowledge obtained. People of the 21st century live in the world of more and more intensive communications and are forced to change in order to meet the conditions of their existence. They are born in a space that is constantly saturated with new digital devices, among which they are already quite comfortable to grow and develop. People will not only preserve, but also create new knowledge, discover the “true humanity” in the depths of history, as well as found the human-sizedness of the future, reducing the risks of existence and spontaneous search for models of individual and social balance. Growing up in a dynamic environment, modern man is ready to switch from the rigid, standard picture of the world to a multidimensional and flexible image of the world continuum. People are potentially able to maintain stability in a difficult to predict situation and confidently navigate in dynamically changing conditions. Research projects immerse people in intellectual competitions to achieve goals and solve problems, which turns into an intellectual sport. People always try to find new ways to interact with nature, develop new tools for this, among which an increasing place is occupied by artificial intelligence, with which you can calculate the many options for communication models. The author focuses on the productivity of this approach in working on complex projects related to plotting the future and designing long-term tasks, when it is crucial to reduce formation risks, to push the horizons of development. The article presents the process of scientific knowledge formation as a historically changing one, analyzes a number of its inherent content characteristics and algorithms, which are key to establishment of the modern format of knowledge rationalization.
About the Author
Elena I. Yaroslavtseva
Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
12, Building 1, Goncharnaya Str., Moscow, 109240, Russia
Russian Federation
12, Building 1, Goncharnaya Str., Moscow, 109240, Russia
References
1. Zotov A.F., Melvil Yu.K. Zapadnaya filosofiya XX veka. Uchebnoe posobie [Western Philosophy of the 20th Century. Textbook]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 1998, 432 p.
2. On the Distinction between Devices and Gadgets, Uchebka WordPress — sozdanie saitov dlya chainikov: Blog o sozdanii, vedenii i optimizatsii saitov s WordPress [WordPress Tutorial — Creating Websites for Dummies: A Blog on Creating, Maintaining and Optimizing Websites from WordPress]. Available at: http://yrokiwp.ru/voprosyi-i-otvetyi/devays-chto-eto-takoe-chto-takoe-gadzhet (accessed 28.07.2018) (in Russ.).
3. Krylov V. Cross-Device and the Problems of Modern Marketing, Vysshaya shkola marketinga i razvitiya biznesa NIU “Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki”: ofitsial’nyi sait [Higher School of Marketing and Business Development of the Higher School of Economics: official website]. Available at: https://mar keting.hse.ru/data/2017/11/22/1160834548/HSE%20-%20%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%B8%CC%86%D1%81.pdf (accessed 13.09.2018) (in Russ.).
4. Yaroslavtseva E.I. Digital Aborigines between the Past and the Future, Problemy i metody khudozhestvennogo vospitaniya i obrazovaniya v sovremennom polikul’turnom prostranstve: sbornik materialov [Problems and Methods of Artistic Education in the Modern Multicultural Space: collected materials]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2014, pp. 63—73 (in Russ.).
5. Basilova T.A. Deaf-Blind Children, Spetsial’naya psikhologiya: Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vysshikh ped. uchebnykh zavedenii [Special Psychology: textbook for students of pedagogical higher educational institutions], 2003, pp. 391—406. Available at: http://psychlib.ru/inc/absid.php?absid=103232 (accessed 01.08.2018) (in Russ.).
6. Elkonin D.B. Psikhologiya igry [Game Psychology]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1976, 304 p.
7. Bernshtein N.A. Biomekhanika i fiziologiya dvizhenii: izbr. psikhol. tr. [Biomechanics and Physiology of Movements: selected psychological works]. Moscow, Moskovskii Psikhologo-Sotsial’nyi Institut Publ., Voronezh, MODEK Publ., 2008, 687 p.
8. Medical Equipment Designer, Atlas novykh professii [Atlas of Emerging Jobs]. Available at: http://atlas100.ru/catalog/meditsina/arkhitektor-me doborudovaniya/ (accessed 06.05.2018) (in Russ.).
9. The Golden Age of Science Fiction, Akademik: slovari i entsiklopedii [Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias]. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/1796446#.D0.A0.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B8.D1.82.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B6.D0.B0.D0.BD.D1.80.D0.B0 (accessed 06.05.2018) (in Russ.).
10. Britikov A.F. Russkii sovetskii nauchno-fantasticheskii roman [Russian Soviet Science Fiction Novel]. Leningrad, Nauka. Leningradskoe Otdelenie Publ., 1970, 447 p.
11. Chernysheva T.A. Priroda fantastiki [The Nature of Fiction]. Irkutsk, Irkutskogo Universiteta Publ., 1984, 331 p.
12. May 2 Marks Almost 500 Years since the Death of Leonardo da Vinci, Radio Golos Stolitsy: kanal na YouTube [Golos Stolitsy Radio: YouTube Channel], 2018, May 2. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMaGa4vq8Uk (accessed 30.07.2018) (in Russ.).
13. Professor Filippov’s Missing Manuscripts, Telekanal “Rossiya – Kul’tura”: ofitsial’nyi sait [“Russia — Culture” TV Channel: official website]. Available at: https://tvkultura.ru/anons/show/episode_id/1726571/brand_id/20907/ (accessed 01.08.2018) (in Russ.).
14. Sokuler Z.A. Znanie i vlast’: nauka v obshchestve moderna [Knowledge and Power: Science in the Modern Society]. St. Petersburg, RKhGI Publ., 2001.
15. Gatina M.R., Mikhel D.V. The Early History of the Royal Society of London through the Eyes of Modern Historians of Science, Dialog so vremenem. Al’manakh intellektual’noi istorii [Dialogue with Time. Almanac of Intellectual History]. Moscow, IVI RAN, URSS Publ., 2011, issue 34 (1), pp. 191—205. Available at: http://www.sstu.ru/files/fuss/images/191-205%20%D0%93%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C-15.pdf (accessed 06.09.2018) (in Russ.).
16. Polanyi M. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985, 344 p. (in Russ.).
17. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie: struktura, istoricheskaya evolyutsiya [Theoretical Knowledge: Structure, Historical Evolution]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2000, 744 p.
18. Petrov M.K. Sotsial’no-kul’turnye osnovaniya razvitiya sovremennoi nauki [Social and Cultural Foundations of Modern Science Development]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1992, 229 p.
Review
For citations:
Yaroslavtseva E.I. Science as a Game of Natural Intelligence. Observatory of Culture. 2018;15(4):402-412. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-4-402-412
Views:
1061
Email this article 