The Subculture of Male Unions as a Socio-Cultural Institution in Modern Societies
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-6-740-753
Abstract
At the present time, in the socio-cultural space, there are many communities and subcultural movements attractive to young people and aimed at young people. Subcultural diversity, which constitutes the integrity of society’s culture, acts as a space for the formation of identification models and an alternative to cultural unification, which is increasingly embracing the world.
Diversity is a source of social development and, under the conditions of cardinal cultural and civilizational changes, requires scientific understanding to justify the instruments of its support, on the one hand. On the other hand, it needs the development of practical recommendations and a system of measures for effective interaction of the state with subcultural communities.
Male unions have an important role and active development in the life of society and in the subcultural environment. Historically representing a fundamental socio-cultural element of social development, they occupied a social niche and began to play an essential role in society in the 21st century.
It is relevant to study the role of male unions in modern society because of the following factors: 1) the institution of male unions of ancient tribes, with their initiation rites, has acquired a new form and content and still exists, 2) the experience of studying the role of male unions demonstrates that they are included in a complex system of social and spiritual ties and have made a significant contribution to the formation of certain structures of society, once becoming a prototype of the modern armed forces, 3) currently possessing a large network of interpersonal closed ties, including those at the international level, and a well-established collective identity, male unions influence the functioning of the social system and its cultural and spiritual content.
The article aims to describe the subculture of male unions represented by motorcycle clubs, as well as to determine the methodological problems associated with the study of motorcycle subculture as a socio-cultural component of society.
The novelty of the article is in the generalization of life regularities of modern male unions as traditional socio-cultural institutions. The emergence of such a phenomenon makes it important to study the possible prospects for male unions’ development, their role and place in society, and interaction with them.
About the Author
Anna V. KomarovaRussian Federation
27, Kalanchevskaya Str., Moscow, 107078, Russia
References
1. Volkova N.A., Kataeva O.V., Khodanovich M.A. Interdisciplinarity in the Humanitarian Knowledge, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2018, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 32—38 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-1-32-38.
2. Lukov V.A. Youth Subcultures in Modern Russia, Gumanitarnoe znanie v XXI veke: V chest’ 70-letiya Igorya Mikhailovicha Il’inskogo [Humanitarian Knowledge in the 21st Century: To the 70th Anniversary of Igor Mikhailovich Ilyinsky]. Moscow, Natsional’nogo Instituta Biznesa Publ., 2006, pp. 478—505 (in Russ.).
3. Andreev Yu.V. Muzhskie soyuzy v doriiskikh gorodakh-gosudarstvakh (Sparta i Krit) [Male Unions in Dorian the City-States (Sparta and Crete)]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2004, 336 p.
4. Azarov A.I. Traditsionnye muzhskie soyuzy Melanezii kontsa XIX — serediny XX v.: k voprosu o roli muzhskikh domov, rangovykh i tainykh soyuzov v melaneziiskikh obshchestvakh perioda formirovaniya ranneklassovykh otnoshenii [Traditional Male Unions of Melanesia of the Late 19th — Mid 20th Centuries: On the Role of Male Houses, Rank and Secret Unions in Melanesian Societies during the Formation of Early Class Relations], Cand. hist. sci. diss.: 07.00.07. Leningrad, 1985, 265 p.
5. Andreeva T.V. Tainye obshchestva v Rossii v pervoi treti XIX v.: pravitel’stvennaya politika i obshchestvennoe mnenie [Secret Societies in Russia in the First Third of the 19th Century: Government Policy and Public Opinion], Doct. hist. sci. diss.: 07.00.02. St. Petersburg, 2010, 1101 p.
6. Khozerova T.P. Tainye obshchestva kak sotsial’no-istoricheskii fenomen [Secret Societies as a Socio-Historical Phenomenon], Cand. philos. sci. diss. abstr.: 09.00.11. Nizhny Novgorod, 2005, 28 p.
7. Maslov A.A. Tainye obshchestva v politicheskoi kul’ture Kitaya XX v. (konets 20-kh — 80-e gg.) [Secret Societies in the Political Culture of China of the 20th Century (The Late 20s — 80s)], Cand. hist. sci. diss.: 07.00.03. Moscow, 1992, 372 p.
8. Gubanov I.B. Etnicheskaya kul’tura Skandinavii epokhi vikingov [Ethnic Culture of Scandinavia of the Viking Age], Cand. hist. sci. diss.: 07.00.07. St. Petersburg, 2003, 237 p.
9. Lebedev G.S. Epokha vikingov v Severnoi Evrope [The Viking Age in Northern Europe], Doct. hist. sci. diss.: 07.00.03. Leningrad, 1985, 286 p.
10. Ivanchik A.I. Cimmerians and Scythians. Cultural-Historical and Chronological Problems of Archeology of the East European Steppes and Caucasus of the Pre- and Early Scythian Period (The Steppe Peoples of Eurasia, II), Academia: website. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/11316735 (accessed 12.09.2018) (in Russ.).
11. Karpov Yu.Yu. Muzhskie soyuzy v sotsiokul’turnoi traditsii gortsev Kavkaza, XIX — nachalo XX v. [Male Unions in the Socio-Cultural Tradition of the Caucasus Highlanders in the 19th — Beginning of the 20th Century], Doct. hist. sci. diss.: 07.00.07. St. Petersburg, 1999, 391 p.
12. Ryblova M.A. Muzhskie soobshchestva donskikh kazakov kak sotsiokul’turnyi fenomen XVI — pervoi treti XIX v. [Male Communities of Don Cossacks as a Socio-Cultural Phenomenon of the 16th — First Third of the 19th Century], Doct. hist. sci. diss.: 24.00.01. Volgograd, 2009, 491 p.
13. Fetisov A.A., Shchavelev A.S. Vikingi. Mezhdu Skandinaviei i Rus’yu [The Vikings. Between Scandinavia and Russia]. Moscow, Veche Publ., 2017, 320 p.
14. Galyamichev A.N., Mikhailin V.Yu. State Power and Traditions of Military Men’s Unions in the Slavic World (To the Problem Formulation), Logos, 2003, no. 4—5 (39), pp. 234—242 (in Russ.).
15. Lisyuchenko I.V. Evolution of the Two Types of Male Unions in East Slavic Tribes, Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya. Vyp. 38 [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. History. Issue 38], 2009, no. 41 (179), pp. 23—28 (in Russ.).
16. Huizinga J. Osen’ Srednevekov’ya [The Autumn of the Middle Ages]. St. Petersburg, Ivana Limbakha Publ., 2016, 768 p.
17. Seward D. The Monks of War: The Military Religious Orders. Moscow, Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2016, 319 p. (in Russ.).
18. Belyakov A.P. The History of the Navy Clergy and its Role in the Education of Military Sailors of Pre-Revolutionary Russia, DeloRus — portal dlya delovykh lyudei Rossii i Zarubezh’ya [DeloRus — A Portal for Business People in Russia and Abroad]. Available at: http://www.delorus.com/medialibrary/detail.php?ID=2292 (accessed 13.08.2018) (in Russ.).
19. Shub M.L. Social, Collective, and Cultural Memory: A New Approach to the Definition of the Semantic Borders of Concepts, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2017, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 4—11 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-1-4-11.
20. Kozlova O.D., Kinderknekht A.S. The Phenomenon of Clip Thinking: Between Stereotype and Rhizome, Voprosy filosofii: sait [Russian Studies in Philosophy: website]. Available at: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1874&Itemid=52 (accessed 05.10.2018) (in Russ.).
21. Astafyeva O.N. Instability of Cultural Identity in the Modern World and its Projections in Creative Industries, 4-th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences & Arts SGEM-2017. Book 2. Sofia, Bolgariy Publ., 2017, pp. 25—32. DOI: 10.5593/sgemsocial2017/22/S06.004.
22. Astafyeva O.N. Collective Identity in the Conditions of Global Changes: Dynamics of the Sustainable and Acceleration of the Emerging, Voprosy sotsial’noi teorii: nauchnyi al’manakh [Issues of Social Theory: scientific almanac], 2011, vol. 5. Moscow, Nezavisimogo Instituta Grazhdanskogo Obshchestva Publ., 2011, pp. 223—241 (in Russ.).
23. Astafyeva O.N. Restructuring and Demarcation of Collective Identities in the Context of Globalization: The Future of National and Cultural Identity, Voprosy sotsial’noi teorii: nauchnyi al’manakh [Issues of Social Theory: scientific almanac], 2010, vol. 4, pp. 255—281 (in Russ.).
24. Barker T. Biker Gangs and Organized Crime. USA, LexisNexisGroup Publ., 2007, 189 p.
25. Komarova A.V. Youth and Public Organizations as a Universal Socio-Cultural Institution for the Development of a Culture of Civic Participation, Obrazovanie i kul’tura: potentsial vzaimodeistviya i resursy NKO v sotsiokul’turnom razvitii regionov Rossii. Teoriya i praktika sotsiokul’turnogo razvitiya: sbornik materialov i statei III Kul’turnogo foruma regionov Rossii [Education and Culture: The Potential for Interaction and the Resources of Non-Commercial Organizations in the Socio-Cultural Development of Russian Regions. The Theory and Practice of Socio-Cultural Development: Collected Materials and Articles of the 3rd Cultural Forum of Russian Regions]. Moscow, IP Lyadov Publ., 2017, pp. 70—73 (in Russ.).
26. Orlova E.A. The Concept of “Lifestyle” in the Context of Studying Socio-Cultural Microdynamics, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2011, no. 2, pp. 28—36 (in Russ.).
27. “Club Space”. An Interview with the Surgeon: “.... Sooner or Later We Will Create a Russian Motorcycle!”, Motoklub “Nochnye Volki”: sait [“Night Wolves” Motorcycle Club: website]. Available at: http://nightwolves.ru/nw/smi/1677/ (accessed 05.10.2018) (in Russ.).
28. Motorcycle Pilgrimage “Russian Way”, Russkaya doroga [Russian Road]. Available at: http://rusdoroga.su/russian-way/ (accessed 05.10.2018) (in Russ.).
29. The Number of Motorcycles Registered in the Capital Increased by 6.7% in 2016 — up to 91,7 Thousand Units, Agentstvo gorodskikh novostei “Moskva” [City News Agency “Moscow”], 2017, February 8. Available at: https://www.mskagency.ru/materials/2635466 (accessed 05.10.2018) (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Komarova A.V. The Subculture of Male Unions as a Socio-Cultural Institution in Modern Societies. Observatory of Culture. 2018;15(6):740-753. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-6-740-753