Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

Identification of the Productive Paradigm of the Artistic Culture of Yakutia

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2019-16-3-251-262

Abstract

The article is devoted to the theore­tic comprehension of the artistic culture of Yakutia of the 20th — 21st centuries, first conduc­ted from the perspective of methodological concepts of M. Mamardashvili-Pyatigorsky and the theory of modernization of S. Eisenstadt. The author develops a model for determining the properties and characteristics of the emerging cultural paradigm, denoting it by the term “ethno-modern”. The scientific novelty of the work is determined by the lack of research, in the regional art history and cultu­ral studies, focused on methodological innovation in the philosophy of art. Identifying the patterns and characteristics of the formation of modern regional art is timely because it contributes to the description of cultural systems and codes of multinational Russia. The study sets the task of classifying the Yakut artistic culture (from the pre-modern to the post-modern) and the typology of the symbolic constructs of consciousness, which is inherent to the art of these sta­ges. The current state of the creative culture of Yakutia is determined through the potential of theatrical, cinema, fine and musical arts (ethno-modern and ethno-premodern). The methods of interdisciplinary studies allows to identify the ethnoforming constructs of the artistic culture of Yakutia, different symbo­lic categories of consciousness in the spiritual landscape of the region and offer the author’s version of the analysis of the stages of development of European culture at the example of the art of the natio­nal region. There are indicated the two main trends that operate with symbolic constructs of a mytholo­gical or metaphysical type of comprehension. The result of the conducted study is the author’s concept of a new paradigm of the creative culture of Yakutia (ethno-modern), combined with the state of ethno-premodern. The article reveals the characteristics of this paradigm, potential of self-development and correlation with the accepted classification of European cultural evolution.

About the Author

Aleksey G. Pudov
Yakutsk State Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

3, 3 km, Sergelyakhskoe Rd., Yakutsk, 677007, Russia

ORCID 0000-0001-6215-9461; SPIN 1902-7104



References

1. Pokatilova I.V. Plasticheskii fol’klor v khudozhestvennoi kul’ture Yakutii [Figurative Folklore in the Artistic Culture of Yakutia]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2013, 184 p.

2. Pokatilova I.V. To the Problem of the Formation of the System of Arts in Yakutia, Kul’tura i tsivilizatsiya [Culture and Civilization], 2018, vol. 8, no. 2 A, pp. 159—165 (in Russ.).

3. Romanova E.N., Nikiforova V.S. Epic Heritage of the Sakha People in the 20th Century: Soviet Experiment, Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya [Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: History and Philology], 2013, vol. 12, issue 3: Arkheologiya i etnografiya [Archaeology and Ethnography], pp. 114—122 (in Russ.).

4. Danilova N.K. Imaginary Space: Geopoetics of Northern Territories, Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura. 2019. No. 1 (57): setevoe izdanie [Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2019. No. 1 (57): Online Publication]. doi: 10.24158/fik.2019.1.26 (in Russ.).

5. Kagan M.S. On the Substance, Structure and Functions of Culture (On the Foundations of Cultural Science), Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo [Personality. Culture. Society], 2004, vol. 6, no. 2 (22), pp. 123—134 (in Russ.).

6. Pudov A.G. Symbolic Explication of the Ethnocultural Evolution: On the Example of Sakha People, Filosofiya i kul’tura [Philosophy and Culture], 2018, no. 1 (121), pp. 32—38. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2018.1.25165.

7. Olonkho, Bol’shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya [Great Russian Encyclopedia]. Available at: https://bigenc.ru/literature/text/2685640 (accessed 16.03.2019) (in Russ.).

8. Demina N.A. Artistic Analysis of Rublev’s Trinity, Andrei Rublev.Ru: website. Available at: http://andrey-rublev.ru/demina-troitsa-analyse-7.php (accessed 16.03.2019) (in Russ.).

9. Eisenstadt S.N. Multiple Modernities, Daedalus, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 1—29. Available at: http://blog.wbkolleg.unibe.ch/wp-content/uploads/Eisenstadt_Multiple-Modernities.pdf (accessed 16.03.2019).

10. Kagan M.S. Morfologiya iskusstva [Art Morphology], Leningrad, Iskusstvo Pabl., 1972, 440 p.

11. Mamardashvili M.K. Neobkhodimost’ sebya: vvedenie v filosofiyu: Doklady. Stat’i. Filosofskie zametki [Necessity of Yourself: Introduction to Philosophy. Lectures. Articles. Philosophical Notes]. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 1996, 431 p.

12. Mamardashvili M.K., Pyatigorsky A.M. Simvol i soznanie. Metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii, simvolike i yazyke [Symbol and Consciousness. Metaphysical Discourse about Consciousness, Symbolism and Language]. Moscow, Shkola “Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury” Publ., 1997, 224 p.

13. Mamardashvili M.K. Filosofskie chteniya [Philosophical Readings]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika Publ., 2002, 824 p.

14. Pudov A.G. Estetika simvolicheskogo v epokhu tranzitivnoi sotsial’noi real’nosti [The Aesthetics of the Symbolic in the Era of Transitive Social Reality]. Yakutsk, Media-Kholding “Yakutiya” Publ., 2014, 335 p.

15. Pastoureau M. Simvolicheskaya istoriya evropeiskogo srednevekov’ya [The Symbolic History of the European Middle Ages]. St. Petersburg, Alexandria Publ., 2012, 447 p. Available at: http://historylib.org/historybooks/Mishel-Pasturo_Simvolicheskaya-istoriya-evropeyskogo-srednevekovya/2 (accessed 16.03.2019) (in Russ.).

16. Danilova I.E. Iskusstvo srednikh vekov i Vozrozhdeniya: raboty raznykh let [Art of the Middle Ages and Renaissance: works of different years]. Moscow, Sovetskii Khudozhnik Publ., 1984, 272 p.

17. Dianova V.M. Postmodernistskaya filosofiya iskusstva: istoki i sovremennost’ [Postmodern Philosophy of Art: Origins and Modernity]. St. Petersburg, Petropolis Publ., 1999, 240 p.

18. Ortega y Gasset J. O tochke zreniya v iskusstve [About the Point of View in Art]. Available at: http://lib.ru/FILOSOF/ORTEGA/ortega10.txt (accessed 16.03.2019).

19. Nikonova S.B. The Tragic Hero of Modernity and the Crisis of Postmodern Art, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo un-ta. Seriya 6: Filosofiya, politologiya, sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pravo, mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University. Series 6: Philosophy, Political Science, Sociology, Psychology, Law, International Relations], 2003, issue 1 (no. 6), pp. 34—43 (in Russ.).

20. Kapustina L.B. Nietzsche: “ApertoLibro”, Studia Culturae, 2014, issue 21, pp. 37—52 (in Russ.).

21. Podvoisky D.G., Zhurakovskaya P.B. (Con)Temporary Art: Aesthetic Practices of Modernism and their Theoretical Account, Vestnik Rossiiskogo un-ta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya: Nauchnyi zhurnal [RUDN Journal of Sociology], 2008, no. 3, pp. 38—52 (in Russ.).

22. Titar E.V. Cultural Identity and the Arts: Visual Strategies of Modern and Postmodern, Izvestiya Saratovskogo un-ta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika [Bulletin of the Saratov University. New Series. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy], 2014, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 55—59 (in Russ.).

23. Pudov A.G. Natsional’noe bytie na teatral’nykh podmostkakh: k 110-mu Yubileinomu sezonu Sakha akademicheskogo teatra im. P.A. Oiunskogo [National Being on the Stage: To the 110th Anniversary Season of the P.A. Oyunsky Sakha Academic Theater]. Yakutsk, SMIK Publ., 2016, 88 p.

24. Pudov A.G. Transformation of the Phenomenon of Ethnicity and Issues of Ethnocultural Modernization in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Chelovek i Sever: antropologiya, arkheologiya, ekologiya: materialy vseros. nauch. konf., g. Tyumen’, 2—6 aprelya 2018 g. [Proc. of the All-Russian Scientific Conf. “Man and the North: Anthropology, Archeology, Ecology” (Tyumen, April 2—6, 2018)]. Tyumen, FITs TyumNTs SO RAN Publ., 2018, issue 4, pp. 415—419 (in Russ.).

25. Ivanova-Unarova Z.I. The Heritage of the Ancient Culture of the Yukaghir and Inuit in the Contemporary Art of the Arctic, Arktika. XXI vek. Gumanitarnye nauki [Arctic. 21st Century. Humanities], 2014, no. 2 (3), pp. 63—68 (in Russ.).

26. Bliskavitsky A.A. Symbol and Myth in the Philosophy of Vyacheslav Ivanov, Filosofiya i kul’tura [Philosophy and Culture], 2013, no. 7 (67), pp. 942—950 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/1999—2793.2013.7.7024.

27. Rozin V.M. The Death of Culture. Long Live Culture! Zhurnal “INTELROS — intellektual’naya Rossiya”: sait [“INTELROS — Intellectual Russia” Journal: website]. Available at: http://www.intelros.ru/intelros/reiting/reyting_09/material_sofiy/5483-smert-kultury-da-zdravstvuet-kultura.html (accessed 16.03.2019) (in Russ.).

28.


Review

For citations:


Pudov A.G. Identification of the Productive Paradigm of the Artistic Culture of Yakutia. Observatory of Culture. 2019;16(3):251-262. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2019-16-3-251-262

Views: 958


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)