Transformation of Values into Social Institutions (An Experience of Phi­losophical Understanding of the Economy Culture)

The study is devoted to the complex analysis of the actual problem of philosophical understanding of the economy culture in the context of transformation of the economy culture values into social institutions. The aim of the study is to substantiate the determinism of the process of transformation of values into social institutions (regulators) by objective economic interests of people. Taking into account the discussion of recent decades about the nature of the transformation under consideration, the author offers a comparative analysis of existing points of view on the nature and dynamics of the process. The article reveals the ambiguity of modern interpretations of the principle of rationalism, which is determined by the constant transformation of values in the conditions of instability of the market economy. The author reveals the nature and the main stages (phases) of the process of transformation of values into social institutions — norms of human behavior. The article defines the content of the three main phases of this process (generation, insight, exteriorization). The author formulates the idea of homeostasis of the value system, which is represen­ted by the ability of various complex systems to maintain their dynamic balance through self-regulation and the ability to maintain internal stability. The article compares the conceptual approaches to this idea contained in the works of L.N. Gumilyov, K. Marx, G. Wallas, E. Brooking and other authors. There are highlighted two initial archetypes of the economy culture (secular and religious); their nature, content and basic elements are revealed. The article identifies the positive historical experience of the philosophy of culture in the field of formation of the status rank of various values and their actualization within the secular and religious economy culture. The author indicates the prospects of the axiological approach to the further study of this problem, taking into account the growing instability, uncertainty and risks of the further socio-economic and socio-cultural development of society (the chaotization of social procedurality, the growing social opposition in the form of deviant and delinquent behavior, etc.).

1. North D. Institutional Change: Analysis Framework, Voprosy ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 1997, no. 3, pp. 6—10 (in Russ.).

2. Finogentov V.N. Ontological Status and Methodological Meaning of the Term “Social Regulator”, Filosofskaya zhizn’ Urala: Problemy obshchei i sotsial’noi ontologii [Philosophical Life of the Urals: Problems of General and Social Ontology]. Yekaterinburg, Ural’skii Gosudarstvennyi Tekhnicheskii Universitet Publ., 1999, pp. 111—122 (in Russ.).

3. Luhmann N. Obshchestvo kak sotsial’naya sistema. Media kommunikatsii. Evolyutsiya [Society as a Social System. Media Communications. Evolution]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2011, 640 p.

4. Nalimov V.V. Spontannost’ soznaniya: Veroyatnostnaya teoriya smyslov i smyslovaya arkhitektonika lichnosti [Spontaneity of Consciousness: Probabilistic Theory of Meanings and Semantic Architectonics of Personality]. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2011, 399 p.

5. Minaeva N.S., Pivovarov D.V. The Concepts of the Conscious and the Unconscious: Psychological Aspect, Psikhologicheskii vestnik Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Psychological Bulletin of the Ural State University]. Yekaterinburg, Ural’skogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Publ., 2009, no. 7, pp. 181—199 (in Russ.).

6. Stozhko K.P. Ekonomicheskoe soznanie [Economic Consciousness]. Yekaterinburg, Ural’skogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Publ., 2002, 426 p.

7. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz khaosa: Novyi dialog cheloveka s prirodoi [Order out of Chaos. Man’s New Dialogue with Nature]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986, 432 p.

8. Ryzhenkov V.E. Conceptualization of Chaos as a Perspective of Philosophy, Filosofiya khozyaistva [Philosophy of Economy], 2018, no. 5, pp. 175—188 (in Russ.).

9. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya [A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia]. Yekaterinburg, U-Faktoriya Publ., 2010, 895 p.

10. Porus V.N. Contextualism in Philosophy of Science, Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology & Philosophy of Science], 2018, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 75—93 (in Russ.).

11. Agapova V.N. Cultural Values and their Classification Methods, Filosofiya i kul’tura [Philosophy and Culture], 2018, no. 3, pp. 1—5 (in Russ.).

12. Tkachenko I.N. Evolyutsiya vnutrifirmennykh korporativnykh otnoshenii [Evolution of Intra-Corporate Relations]. Yekaterinburg, Institut Ekonomiki UrO RAN Publ., 2001, 309 p.

13. Williamson O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. St. Petersburg, Lenizdat Publ., 1996, 702 p. (in Russ.).

14. Waterman R. The Renewal Factor: How the Best Get and Keep the Competitive Edge. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, 368 p. (in Russ.).

15. Marx K., Engels F. Sobr. soch. [Collected Works], 1962, vol. 26, part 1, 477 p.

16. Morozov V.V. Foreign Theories of Creativity Review, Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State University], 2016, no. 12(200), pp. 35—41 (in Russ.).

17. Nollke M. Tekhniki kreativnosti [Creativity Techniques]. Moscow, Omega-L Publ., 2006, 144 p.

18. Gumilyov L.N. Konets i vnov’ nachalo [An End and a New Beginning]. Moscow, Airis-Press Publ., 2008, 384 p.

19. Wallas G. The Art of Thought. New York, Harcourt, Brace and Company Publ., 1926, 314 p.

20. Brooking E. Intellektual’nyi kapital: Klyuch k uspekhu v novom tysyacheletii [Intellectual Capital: The Key to Success in the New Millennium]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001, 288 p.

21. Stozhko D.K. Socio-Cultural Dynamics and Economic Development: (To the 130th Anniversary of the Birth of P.A. Sorokin), Diskurs [Discourse], 2018, no. 5, pp. 13—23 (in Russ.).

22. Lossky N.O. Bog i mirovoe zlo [God and Suffering]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1994, 432 p.

23. Jung C. Arkhetip i simvol [Archetype and Symbol]. Moscow, Kanon Publ., 2015, 335 p.

24. Lvov D.V. The Concept of “Archetype” in Russian Scientific Publications for 2015—2016, Filosofiya khozyaistva [Philosophy of Economy], 2018, no. 3(123), pp. 8—16 (in Russ.).

25. Isaevsky A.V. Reason of Being in the Works of Russian Religious Thinkers, Filosofiya sotsial’nykh kommunikatsii [Philosophy of Social Communications], 2015, no. 1(30), pp. 103—110 (in Russ.).

26. Toynbee A. A Study of History. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1996, 608 p. (in Russ.).

27. Cheremnykh O.S., Cheremnykh S.V. Strategicheskii korporativnyi reinzhiniring: protsessno-stoimostnoi podkhod k upravleniyu biznesom [Strategic Corporate Reengineering: A Process-Value Approach to Business Management]. Moscow, Finansy i Statistika Publ., 2005, 736 p.

28. Blaug M. Ekonomicheskaya mysl’ v retrospektive [Economic Theory in Retrospect]. Moscow, Delo Ltd. Publ., 1994, 720 p.

29. Ha-Joon Chang. Kak ustroena ekonomika [Economics: The User’s Guide]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Farber Publ., 2017, 304 p.

30. Pavlov A.V. Motivation in Science and Education, Sotsium i vlast’ [Society and Power], 2016, no. 5, pp. 120—121 (in Russ.).

31. Stozhko D.K., Fomenko S.S. Binarity of Legal Consciousness of the Individual in Conditions of Institutional Transformations, Upravlenets [The Manager], 2014, no. 1(47), pp. 74—78 (in Russ.).

32. Kistyakovsky B.A. In Defense of the Law, Vekhi. Intelligentsiya v Rossii. 1909—1910 [Milestones. Intellectuals in Russia. 1909—1910]. Moscow, Molodaya Gvardiya Publ., 1991, 464 p. (in Russ.).

33. Presidential Decree of December 31, 2015 No. 683 “On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation”, Rossiiskaya gazeta [Russian Gazette]. Available at: https://rg.ru/2015/12/31/nac-bezopasnost-site-dok.html (accessed 25.02.2019) (in Russ.).