Overcoming Cultural and Educational Conservatism is the Way to New Models of Education
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2019-16-2-128-141
Abstract
The article is devoted to finding ways to overcome conservatism in cultural and educational practices, analyzing traditional and innovative cultural and educational experiences in modern education. The authors consider education as a phenomenon that has a dual nature, which is closely related to the development of cultural traditions and civilizational innovations. The article shows that in the conditions of social turbulence, unpredictability and uncertainty, constant acceleration in technological and social processes, the cultural and educational practices are lagging behind the demands of modern society. Rooted in the core of the cultural and educational matrix, they restrain the development of our society, in which new generations, born in the conditions of information and digital revolution, have come. These generations have a different worldview, values, attitudes towards career, free time, environmental and safety issues. Their vital elements are the virtual world and the world of modern gadgets with all the ensuing consequences. Generational rift exacerbates problems in the education system, which is changing very slowly. New generations need to be taught not traditionally but taking into account their needs and new technologies. The article provides a number of concrete examples related to the points of growth of cultural and educational innovations, suggests a number of actions that can lead to formation of new higher education models that meet the demands of modern society, new type of universities called digital or universities 4.0. In addition, the authors draw attention to the fact that culture and education have similarities and differences in their nature and functioning. Culture and education are interdependent, which does not negate significant differences between them. Culture, by its nature, is a self-constructive system, and education is built in accordance with a specific goal setting. The authors consider that the best option is the one in which in the processes of interaction and, especially, interinfluence of culture and education, priorities will be on the side of culture.
About the Authors
Arnold A. OganovRussian Federation
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University,
27, Building 4, Lomonosovsky Av., Moscow, 119991, Russia
Mikhail Shchepkin Higher Theatre School,
6, Neglinnaya Str., Moscow, 109012, Russia
ORCID 0000-0002-6385-2222; SPIN 3685-3796
Irina G. Khangeldieva
Russian Federation
27, Building 4, Lomonosovsky Av., Moscow, 119991, Russia
ORCID 0000-0001-6823-7950; SPIN 3470-7532
References
1. Toffler A. Future Shock. St. Petersburg, Lan’ Publ., 1997, 464 p. (in Russ.).
2. Kostikova I. On Conservatism in Education, Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 2004, no. 7, pp. 116—121 (in Russ.).
3. Kasatkin P.I. The Reform of the Russian Education: Conservatism vs Liberalism, Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke [Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being], 2017, vol. 6, no. 5A, pp. 93—103 (in Russ.).
4. Vidt I.E. Obrazovanie kak fenomen kul’tury: evolyutsiya obrazovatel’nykh modelei v istoriko-kul’turnom protsesse [Education as a Phenomenon of Culture: Evolution of Educational Models in the Historical and Cultural Process], dr. ped. sci. diss. abstr. Tyumen, 2003, 382 p.
5. Shelkanovtseva M. Pedagogical Conservatism as a Cultural Phenomenon, Pandia.ru. Available at: https://pandia.ru/text/77/433/15072.php (accessed 11.03.2019) (in Russ.).
6. Rozova O.V. Cultural Models of Education, Sotsial’naya set’ rabotnikov obrazovaniya nsportal.ru [Nsportal.ru Social Network of Education Workers], 2018, February 19. Available at: https://nsportal.ru/vuz/pedagogicheskie-nauki/library/2018/02/19/kulturnye-modeli-obrazovaniya (accessed 11.03.2019).
7. Wissema J.G. Towards the Third Generation University: Managing the University in Transition. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009, 272 p.
8. Butler J., Gibson D. Research Universities in the Framework of Regional Innovation Ecosystem: The Case of Austin, Texas, Foresight, 2013, vol. 7, no. 27, pp. 42—59.
9. Khangeldieva I.G. Digital Age: Is It Possible to Outstrip Education? Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 20: Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 20. Pedagogical Education]. Moscow, Moskovskogo Universiteta Publ., 2018, no. 3, pp. 48—61 (in Russ.).
10. Wheatley M. Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World. Moscow, Best Business Books Publ., 2011, 210 p. (in Russ.).
11. AsmolovA. (ed.) Mobilis in mobili: Lichnost’ v epokhu peremen [Mobilis in Mobili: A Person in an Era of Change]. Moscow, YaSK Publ., 2018, 546 p.
12. Taleb N. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Moscow, Azbuka-Attikus Publ., 2016, 736 p. (in Russ.).
13. Bell D. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2004, 788 p. (in Russ.).
14. Castells M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul’tura [The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture]. Moscow, 2000, 606 p.
15. Castells M. Galaktika Internet: razmyshleniya ob Internete, biznese i obshchestve [The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society]. Yekaterinburg, U-Faktoriya Publ., 2004, 328 p.
16. Obrazovanie dlya slozhnogo obshchestva: doklad [Educational Ecosystems for Societal Transformation: report]. Available at: https://futuref.org/educationfutures_ru (accessed 11.03.2019).
17. Kondakov I.V. Vvedenie v istoriyu russkoi kul’tury: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov [Introduction to the History of Russian Culture: textbook for universities]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 1997, 686 p.
18. Raushenbakh B., Toporov A. Gavryushin N. and others. Sintez dvukh sistem poznaniya akademika Raushenbakha: Sb. statei k stoletiyu V.B. Raushenbakha [Academician Rauschenbach’s Synthesis of Two Systems of Cognition: collected articles to the centennial of V.B. Rauschenbach]. Moscow, Vegaprint Publ., 2015, 288 p.
19. Berdyaev N.A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka: Opyt personalisticheskoi metafiziki [Slavery and Freedom: An Experience of Personalistic Metaphysics]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1995, 383 p.
20. Karpov A.O. Education in Relation to Truth, Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 2019, no. 1, pp. 56—67 (in Russ.).
21. Belyaeva O.A. Psychological Foundations of Educational Activities Organization in High School, Lichnost’ v epokhu peremen: mobilis in mobili: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (17—18 dekabrya 2018 g.) [Personality in the Era of Change: Mobilis in Mobili: Proceedings of the Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf. (December 17—18, 2018)]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2018, pp. 350—353 (in Russ.).
22. Shturvalov A. Generation Z: How to Assign Tasks for Today’s Twenty-Year-Olds, VC.RU: internet resource, 2015, September 22. Available at: https://vc.ru/flood/10701-generation-z (accessed 11.03.2019) (in Russ.).
23. Budushchee obrazovaniya — global’naya povestka: doklad [The Future of Education — Global Agenda: report]. Available at: http://rusinfoguard.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/GEF.Agenda_ru_full.pdf (accessed 11.03.2019).
24. Vinokurov E. Artist, Raise a Disciple... Serov V. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ krylatykh slov i vyrazhenii [Serov V. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Winged Words and Expressions]. Moscow, Lokid-Press Publ., 2003. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/dic_wingwords/2852/ (accessed 11.03.2019) (in Russ.).
25.
Review
For citations:
Oganov A.A., Khangeldieva I.G. Overcoming Cultural and Educational Conservatism is the Way to New Models of Education. Observatory of Culture. 2019;16(2):128-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2019-16-2-128-141