Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

Interaction of Art and Science in the Context of Synergetics

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2019-16-2-116-127

Abstract

The article considers the interaction of science and art, as well as the development of Science Art from the standpoint of the theory of self-organization and the theory of humanitarian-technological revolution. The world is at the point of bifurcation defining the future. The choice of the further trajectory will be largely determined by what is happening in the emotional and intuitive spaces. This, in turn, depends on the deve­lopment of art, science, philosophy. The article discus­ses alternative futures and the role of culture in them.

Charles Snow wrote about a gap between the two cultures — natural science, answering the question “How?” and looking into the future, and humanities, answering the question “What?” and often reflec­ting on the past.

The growing gap between the two cultures prevents the civilization from relying to the necessary extent on scientific knowledge and leads to its devaluation. The authors show the importance of the “exchange of metaphors” between science and art, allowing to build bridges over the gap of two cultures. Another way to connect these two spaces is the development of interdisciplinary approaches, in particular, the theory of self-organization, or synergetics. In the 1970s, synergetics was conceived as a language that allowed humanitarians, specialists in natural sciences and mathe­maticians to discuss, formulate and pose common problems, while remaining, nevertheless, in the space of science. Now the central interdisciplinary problem is the study of not only the rational (as du­ring the last three centuries), but also the emotional and intuitive space of human and society.

Currently, there are two forecasts materializing — the one of D. Bell, on the transition from the industrial phase of development to the post-industrial, from the world of technology to the world of people, and the one of N.A. Berdyaev, on the transition from the Se­cond Antiquity to the Second Middle Ages. The article shows how this will change the culture itself and its place in society.

About the Authors

Tatiana S. Akhromeeva
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics
Russian Federation

4, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047, Russia

ORCID 0000-0002-8340-5796; SPIN 1960-9996



Georgy G. Malinetsky
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics
Russian Federation

4, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047, Russia

ORCID 0000-0001-6041-1926; SPIN 5684-2049



Sergey A. Posashkov
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

38, Shcherbakovskaya Str., Moscow, 105187, Russia

ORCID 0000-0002-1699-9942; SPIN 8681-8426



References

1. Ortega y Gasset J. Beskhrebetnaya Ispaniya [Invertebrate Spain]. Moscow, AST Publ., Ermak Publ., 2003, 223 p.

2. Bach R. Selected Works. Kiev, Sofiya Publ., 1994, vol. 1, p. 35 (in Russ.).

3. Iooss G., Joseph D. Elementarnaya teoriya ustoichivosti i bifurkatsii [Elementary Stability and Bifurcation Theory]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1983, 301 p.

4. Malinetsky G.G. Matematicheskie osnovy sinergetiki: khaos, struktury, vychislitel’nyi eksperiment [Mathematical Foundations of Synergetics: Chaos, Structures, Computational Experiment]. Moscow, Knizhnyi Dom “LIBROKOM” Publ., 2012, 312 p.

5. Malinetsky G.G. (ed.) Synergetic Horizons: Structures, Chaos, Regimes with Exacerbation, Sinergetika: ot proshlogo k budushchemu [Synergetics: From the Past to the Future]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2019, issue 89, 464 p. (in Russ.).

6. Laszlo E. Vek bifurkatsii: Postizhenie izmenyayushchegosya mira [The Age of Bifurcation: Understanding the Changing World]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1995, 182 p.

7. Penrose L.S., Penrose R. Impossible Objects: A Special Type of Visual Illusion, The British Psychological Society, 1958, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 31—33.

8. Hubel D. Eye, Brain, and Vision. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1990, 239 p. (in Russ.).

9. Coxeter H.S.M. Introduction to Geometry. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1966, 648 p. (in Russ.).

10. Akhromeeva T.S., Malinetsky G.G., Posashkov S.A. Mathematics as a Part of Culture, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2016, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14—23 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2016-1-1-14-23.

11. Escher M.C. Grafika [Graphic Works]. Moscow, Art-Rodnik Publ., Taschen Publ., 2009, 96 p.

12. Golding W. Lord of the Flies. Moscow, AST Publ., 1994, 190 p. (in Russ.).

13. Schwab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya [The Fourth Industrial Revolution]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2017, 208 p.

14. Attali J. Kratkaya istoriya budushchego [A Brief History of the Future]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2014, 288 p.

15. Harari Yu.N. Homo Deus. Kratkaya istoriya budushchego [Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow]. Moscow, Sindbad Publ., 2018, 456 p.

16. Haken H. Sinergetika [Synergetics]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1980, 406 p.

17. Poincaré H. O nauke [Science and Hypothesis]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1990, 736 p.

18. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Moscow, Eksmo-Press Publ., 1997, 73 p.

19. Snow Ch.P. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, Ch.P. Snou. Portrety i razmyshleniya [Ch.P. Snow. Portraits and Reflections]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985, pp. 195—226 (in Russ.).

20. Kapitsa S.P., Kurdyumov S.P., Malinetsky G.G. Sinergetika i prognozy budushchego [Synergetics and Forecasts for the Future]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2003, 288 p.

21. Sartre J.P. Bytie i nichto: opyt fenomenologicheskoi ontologii [Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2000, 640 p.

22. Camus A. Buntuyushchii chelovek. Filosofiya. Politika. Iskusstvo [The Rebel. Philosophy. Politics. Art]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990, 415 p.

23. Kuhn Th. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003, 605 p. (in Russ.).

24. Kasavin I.T. (ed.) Chelovek. Nauka. Tsivilizatsiya: K semidesyatiletiyu akademika V.S. Stepina [Man. Science. Civilization: To the Seventieth Anniversary of Academician V.S. Stepin]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2004, 816 p.

25. Ivanov V.V. Global Humanitarian and Technological Revolution: Background and Perspectives, Innovatsii [Innovations], 2017, no. 6, pp. 3—8 (in Russ.).

26. Berdyaev N. Novoe srednevekov’e: (Razmyshlenie o sud’be Rossii) [The New Middle Ages: Reflections on the Fate of Russia]. Moscow, Folio Publ., AST Publ., 2002, 20 p.

27. Fyodorov N.F. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1982, 709 p.

28. Tsiolkovsky K.E. Grezy o Zemle i nebe: nauchno-fantasticheskie proizvedeniya [Dreams of the Earth and Sky: sci-fi works]. Tula, Priokskoe Publ., 1986, 488 p.

29. Perelman Ya.I. Zanimatel’nyi kosmos: Mezhplanetnye puteshestviya [The Space for Entertainment: Interplanetary Journeys]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2008, 360 p.

30. Lem S. Summa tekhnologii [Summa Technologiae]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1968, 668 p.

31. Bykov P., Sharapov S. A Genetic Storm Is Sweeping Over Us, Ekspert [Expert], 2019, no. 4, pp. 88—93 (in Russ.).

32.


Review

For citations:


Akhromeeva T.S., Malinetsky G.G., Posashkov S.A. Interaction of Art and Science in the Context of Synergetics. Observatory of Culture. 2019;16(2):116-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2019-16-2-116-127

Views: 1780


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)