Artistic Image as a Result of Reality Reflection and Construction
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2020-17-1-16-25
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of artistic image as a gnoseological image. The concept of variety of cognition types, produced by contemporary epistemology, allows to consider art as a special type of cognitive relation to reality, and artistic image as a form of artistic cognition, a result of reality comprehension. In this case, the artistic image is studied from the viewpoint of two concepts — the knowledge understanding as a reflection of reality and as its construction. The analysis of the artistic image within the frame of the first concept (as a result of reality reflection) is traditional for Russian aesthetics. From this point of view, the artistic image is considered in three aspects — objective (it appears through the reality reflection by art), estimative (the artistic image includes an obvious or concealed estimation of reality) and operational (it is connected with creative transformation of reality in the process of its artistic comprehension). The concept of constructivism allows to consider the artistic cognition in other way, as an intense activity of the subject to construct reality. This article bases its argumentation on the idea, by V.A. Lektorsky, of removing the opposition between realism and constructivism through the recognition of the concept of constructive realism. Thereby, the artistic image is presented as the result of the creative activity of the artwork’s author, who transforms the reality, constructs a new, artistic reality, and the addressee, who is included in the artistic reality through actualization, identification, construction of meanings.
About the Author
Elena A. Maltseva
Siberian Transport University;Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Siberian Transport University,
191, Dusi Kovalchuk Str., Novosibirsk, 630049, Russia
Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University,
28, Vilyuiskaya Str., Novosibirsk, 630126, Russia
ORCID 0000-0001-6425-9888; SPIN 2968-3056
References
1. Martishina N.I. Theory of Knowledge Diversity: Some Implications of Paradigm, Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Newsletter of the Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian Research], 2016, no. 1 (10). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontseptsiya-mnogoobraziya-vidov-poznaniya-o-nekotoryh-sledstviyah-paradigmy (accessed 19.10.2019) (in Russ.).
2. Maltseva E.A. Typology of Knowledge: Concept of Species Diversity, Uchenye zapiski Komsomol’skogo-na-Amure gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Scholarly Notes of the Komsomolsk-na-Amure State Technical University], 2019, no. 3 (39), pp. 29—36 (in Russ.).
3. Zabiyako A.P. Image, Kul’turologiya. XX vek: entsiklopediya: v 2 t. [Culturology. The 20th Century: Encyclopedia: in 2 volumes]. Available at: http://psylib.org.ua/books/levit01/txt085.htm (accessed 19.10.2019) (in Russ.).
4. Vasilev S.V. Teoriya otrazheniya i khudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo [Theory of Reflection and Artistic Creativity]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1970, 496 p.
5. Rutkevich M.N., Loifman I.Ya. Dialektika i teoriya poznaniya [Dialectics and Theory of Knowledge]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1994, 383 p.
6. Aristotle. Poetics, Sochineniya: v 4 t. [Works: in 4 volumes]. Moscow, 1983, vol. 4, p. 676 (in Russ.).
7. Constructivism in Epistemology and Human Sciences (“Round Table” Proceedings), Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 2008, no. 3, pp. 3—37 (in Russ.).
8. Kasavin I.T. Constructivism, Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2009, pp. 373—377 (in Russ.).
9. Kagan M.S. Cognition and Appreciation in Art, Problema tsennosti v filosofii [The Problem of Value in Philosophy]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1966, pp. 98—112 (in Russ.).
10. Malyshev I.V. Otrazhenie deistvitel’nosti v muzyke [Reality Reflection in Music]. Available at: https://www.proza.ru/2010/03/10/921 (accessed 19.10.2019).
11. Perevezentseva A.S. World-View Foundations of the “World of Art” Movement: The Freedom of Creativity and the “Pure Art”, Prepodavatel’ XXI vek [Educator the 21st Century], 2011, no. 1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mirovozzrencheskie-osnovy-obedineniya-mir-iskusstva-svoboda-tvorchestva-i-chistoe-iskusstvo (accessed 19.10.2019) (in Russ.).
12. Florensky P.A. Analiz prostranstvennosti i vremeni v khudozhestvenno-izobrazitel’nykh proizvedeniyakh [Analysis of the Spatiality and Time in Artistic and Visual Works]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1993, 324 p.
13. Lektorsky V.A. Is It Possible to Remove the Opposition of Constructivism and Realism? Sotsial’naya filosofiya nauki. Rossiiskaya perspektiva. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii. (Moskva, 18—19 noyabrya 2014 g.). T. 8. Sektsiya 7. Konstruktivizm vs realizm [Proceedings of the International Conference “Social Philosophy of Science. Russian Perspective” (Moscow, November 18—19, 2014). Volume 8. Section 7. Constructivism vs Realism]. Moscow, Al’fa Moskva Publ., 2014, pp. 5—8 (in Russ.).
14. Balzac H. Nevedomyi shedevr [An Unknown Masterpiece]. Available at: http://www.french-book.net/text/Biblio/Ru/Balzac/balzak_nevedomyi_shedevr.html (accessed 19.10.2019).
15. Kagan M.S. Estetika kak filosofskaya nauka [Aesthetics as a Philosophical Science]. St. Petersburg, TK “Petropolis” Publ., 1997, 543 p.
16. Rappoport S.Kh. Ot khudozhnika k zritelyu [From Artist to Viewer]. Moscow, Sovietskii Khudozhnik Publ., 1978, 237 p.
17. Barthes R. S/Z. Moscow, RIK Kul’tura Publ., 1994, 304 p. (in Russ.).
18. Chuvorkina O.A. The Figure of the Author after the “Death of the Author”, Articult, 2013, no. 2 (10). Available at: http://articult.rsuh.ru/upload/articult/journal_content/010/ARTICULT-10_(2-2013,P.28-39)-Chuvorkina.pdf (accessed 19.10.2019) (in Russ.).
• Art Imagery is a particular form of cognition. One of a critical point in modern cognitional theory discussion is about the correlation between reflection and construction in cognition. The subject of debate is solved on in art imagery material.
• The perception understood as a reflection leads to the idea about art imagery as a result of imitation of reality.
• In the framework of the constructivism conception, Art Imagery is a result of constructing reality, the creative transformation of reality as a result of its artistic comprehension.
• Analysis of artwork in different styles showing that in art cognition processes of reflection and construction exist as dialectical opposites.
Review
For citations:
Maltseva E.A. Artistic Image as a Result of Reality Reflection and Construction. Observatory of Culture. 2020;17(1):16-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2020-17-1-16-25
Views:
1816
Email this article 