Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

Virtual States and Symbolic Markets of Identity

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2020-17-2-116-124

Abstract

The author analyzes virtual states in the contexts of identity markets. There is assumed that virtual states can play the role of both subjects and objects of modern symbolic exchange. The article shows that virtual states do not have a common definition, and those who study them offer different approaches ranging from economic to cultural, from social to anthropological. On the one hand, virtual states can sell their identities. The author presumes that markets can be defined as cultures, and cultures as markets. On the other hand, the virtual states’ “products” that actualize their identity can also be goods. There is assumed that the processes of globalization and virtualization significantly changed the vectors and trajectories of identities development, turning them into a part of the market economy. The article assumes that the nation-state is gradually losing its monopoly right to represent the identity of the nation, and new actors are trying to challenge this right by proposing their own projects for identity development.

The author believes that the emergence of virtual states in identity markets was the result of a performative turn and a craft revolution, for virtual states appeared as the consequences of economy craftivization, offering various mechanisms to monetize identities and turn them into sacred and symbolic political products. The author believes that the virtual state was caused by the craftivization of the serial mass identities proposed in the 19th century as in the age of nationalism. There is assumed that the virtual states were the attempts to challenge the regular state’s monopoly inherited from the modern era to construct national identities. Therefore, the article analyzes the virtual states as attempts to revise the modern nation-state in the contexts of a cultural turn in the economy, which turned it into a sphere of production of meanings and identities. In general, the author considers virtual states as a new and alternative form of economic functioning, where the sense-making and meaning-generating constructs that invent and imagine new types and forms of identities become goods.

About the Author

Maksim V. Kirchanov
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation

16, Pushkinskaya Str., Voronezh, 394000, Russia

ORCID 0000-0003-3819-3103; SPIN 6547-1027



References

1. Ryan J., Dunford G., Sellars S. Micronations: The Lonely Planet Guide to Self-Proclaimed Nations. New York, Lonely Planet Publ., 2006, 156 p.

2. Buitrago P.F., Duque I. The Orange Economy: An Infinite Opportunity. Washington, DC, Inter-American Development Bank Publ., 2013, 242 p.

3. Caves R. Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 73—84.

4. Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure and Everyday Life. New York, Basic Books Publ., 2002, 416 p.

5. De Beukelaer Ch., Spence K.-M. Global Cultural Economy. London, Routledge Publ., 2018, 184 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315617800.

6. Howkins J. The Creative Economy: How People Make Money From Ideas. London, Penguin Publ., 2001, 288 p.

7. Burke P. Performing History: The Importance of Occasions, Rethinking History, 2005, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 35—52.

8. Crane M. What Was Performance? Criticism, 2001, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 169—187.

9. Dirksmeier P., Helbrecht I. Time, Non-representational Theory and the “Performative Turn”: Towards a New Methodology in Qualitative Social Research, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2008, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1—24.

10. Menefee S. Republics of the Reefs: Nation-Building on the Continental Shelf and in the World’s Oceans, California Western International Law Journal, 1994, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 81—111.

11. Garavaglia Ch. Birra, identità locale e legame territorial, Agriregionieuropa, 2010, vol. 6, no. 20. Available at: https://agriregionieuropa.univpm.it/en/content/article/31/20/birra-identita-locale-e-legame-territoriale (accessed 26.12.2019).

12. Garavaglia Ch., Swinnen J. The Craft Beer Revolution: An International Perspective, Choices, 2017, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1—8.

13. Mateer J. Digital Cinematography: Evolution of Craft or Revolution in Production? Journal of Film and Video, 2014, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 3—14.

14. Menefee S. Republics of the Reefs: Nation-Building on the Continental Shelf and in the World’s Oceans, California Western International Law Journal, 1994, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 81—111.

15. Akerlof G., Kranton R. Economics and Identity, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, vol. CVX, no. 3, pp. 715—753.

16. Akerlof G., Kranton R. Identity Economics. How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton, Princeton University Press Publ., 2011, 200 p.

17. Greif A. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2006, 526 p.

18. Greif A. Institutions and Trade During the Late Medieval Commercial Revolution. New York, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2005, 249 p.

19. Greif A. Institutions, Innovation, and Industrialization: Essays in Economic History and Development. Princeton, Princeton University Press Publ., 2015, 440 p.


  • States are universal actors in modern international relations, but the processes of globalization and virtualization of culture inspired a new phenomenon – a virtual state;
  • Today cultural activists and intellectuals create virtual states imagining them as an alternative to the regular nation-state of the modern era;
  • A virtual state is not a full-fledged alternative to a nation-state, but it competes with it actively in modern symbolic services markets, offering and selling new forms of identities;
  • The author reveals the cultural significance of virtual states in modern symbolic markets of identity.

Review

For citations:


Kirchanov M.V. Virtual States and Symbolic Markets of Identity. Observatory of Culture. 2020;17(2):116-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2020-17-2-116-124

Views: 1873


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)