Redesign and Retro Design as Methods of Creating Works of Modern Art and Design

The article examines the trend, widespread in modern art and design, to draw inspiration from preceding styles and directions that have remained in one form or another as historical memory and as artifacts existing in the same cultural and information space. The design culture reached its highest level in the field of prototype design during the last phase of modernism in the middle of the 20th century. The postmodern era has broken this tradition. The rejection of modernism as an outdated artistic and creative approach and the search for new ways and methods of design were reflected in the alternative areas of design of the second half of the 1960s, such as radical design and anti-design, which later resulted in redesign and banal design. Rejecting the achievements of modernism with its cult of aesthetics and functionality, and relying on self-expression, designers of the new generation have abandoned attempts to form and develop universal models with a high degree of subordination to aesthetic norms and values, but nevertheless turned to modernism and earlier styles and eras as sources of inspiration. Therefore, it is no accident that a characteristic feature of the design of the turn of the 20th—21st centuries is the endless self-repetition, while redesign and retro design can be considered the key methods of modern design and creation of artworks. In the near future, this situation may, probably, lead to the fact that art and culture will no longer produce original products and ideas. In this regard, the attractiveness, especially for the younger generation, of forms, genres, and techniques that have existed for decades is a cause for concern. Appropriation, reference, and recursion have become typological features of design. Giving opposing opinions on this issue, this article suggests to reflect on the question: should the constant reversion of culture to its past and the related substitution of the novelty of genuine innovation be considered as a positive or negative phenomenon?.

design, art, irony, appropriation, interpretation, redesign, retro design, postmodernism

1. Schlesinger A.M. (Jr.). The Cycles of American History. Moscow, Progress Publ., Progress-Akademiya Publ., 1992, 685 p. (in Russ.).

2. Howe N., Strauss W. Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069. New York, William Morrow & Company Publ., 1991, 538 p.

3. Genisaretsky O.I. Design Culture and Conceptualism, Gumanitarnyi portal [Humanitarian Portal], 2006, August 16. Available at: https://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/2006/2682 (accessed 11.06.2020) (in Russ.).

4. Magee G.A. The Hegel Dictionary. London, New York, Continuum International Publishing Group, 2010, 270 p.

5. Losev A.F. On the Concept of the Artistic Canon, Problema kanona v drevnem i srednevekovom iskusstve Azii i Afriki [The Problem of the Canon in the Ancient and Medieval Art of Asia and Africa]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973, pp. 6—15 (in Russ.).

6. Slyusar V.I. Fabber Technology. A New Tool for Three-Dimensional Modeling, Elektronika: nauka, tekhnologiya, biznes [Electronics: Science, Technology, Business], 2003, no. 5, pp. 54—60 (in Russ.).

7. De Jong C.W. (ed.). Dieter Rams: Ten Principles for Good Design. Munich, London, New York, Prestel Publ., 2017, 416 p.

8. Rosenfield K. Dieter Rams 10 Principles of “Good Design”, ArchDaily, 2012, January 9. Available at: https://www.archdaily.com/198583/dieter-rams-10-principles-of-%25e2%2580%259cgood-design%25e2%2580%259d (accessed 11.06.2020).

9. Reynolds S. Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to its Own Past. Moscow, Beloe Yabloko Publ., 2015, 528 p. (in Russ.).

10. Derrida J. Prizraki Marksa. Gosudarstvo dolga, rabota skorbi i novyi Internatsional [Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International]. Moscow, Logos-Altera Publ., Ecce Homo Publ., 2006, 256 p.

11. Myuller V.K. Anglo-russkii slovar’ [English-Russian Dictionary]. Moscow, Russkii Yazyk Publ., 1981, 888 p.

12. Kobrin K. Sex and the City: A Guide to Owen Hatherly’s Two Books, Neprikosnovennyi zapas [The Emergency Reserve], 2012, no. 1 (81), pp. 163—170 (in Russ.).

13. Davis Colin. Hauntology, Spectres and Phantoms, French Studies, 2005, no. 59 (3), pp. 373—379. Available at: http://fs.oxfordjournals.org/content/59/3/373.full (accessed 11.06.2020).

14. Pigulevsky V.O. Ironiya i vymysel: ot romantizma k postmodernizmu [Irony and Fiction: From Romanticism to Postmodernism]. Rostov-on-Don, Foliant Publ., 2002, 418 p.

15. Tulchinsky G.L. The Word and Body of Postmodernism, Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 1999, no. 10, pp. 35—53 (in Russ.).

16. Pivoev V.M. Ironiya kak fenomen kul’tury [Irony as a Cultural Phenomenon]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Publ., 2000, 104 p.

17. Tarnas R. The Passion of the Western Mind. Moscow, Kron-Press Publ., 1995, 444 p. (in Russ.).

18. Duchamp M. Apropos of “Readymades”, Esthetics Contemporary. New York, Prometheus Books Publ., 1978, p. 93—94.

19. Brainin-Passek V. About Postmodernism, the Crisis of Perception, and the New Classics, Novyi mir iskusstva [New World of Art], 2002, no. 5 (28), pp. 7—9 (in Russ.).

20. Zharikov S.A. Dyrka do vostrebovaniya (dva Bakha, dve kul’tury i svyashchennyi mat moskovskogo kontseptualizma) [A Hole on Demand (Two Bachs, Two Cultures and the Sacred Obscenities of Moscow Conceptualism)], 2015, April 30. Available at: https://zharikov.dreamwidth.org/91937.html (accessed 11.06.2020).

21. Chernyak V.D., Chernyak M.A. Trash, Massovaya literatura v ponyatiyakh i terminakh: uchebnyi slovar’-spravochnik [Mass Literature in Concepts and Terms: Educational Reference Dictionary]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., Nauka Publ., 2015, pp. 168—169 (in Russ.).

22. Heiser J. Analyze This. A Round Table Discussion Led by Jörg Heiser on “Super-Hybridity”: What Is It and Should We Be Worried? With Ronald Jones, Nina Power, Seth Price, Sukhdev Sandhu and Hito Steyerl, Frieze.com, 2010, September 1. Available at: https://frieze.com/article/analyze (accessed 11.06.2020).

23. Heiser J. What Is “Super-Hybridity”? Frieze.com, 2010, September 1. Available at: https://frieze.com/article/pick-mix (accessed 11.06.2020).

24. Bourriaud N. Relyatsionnaya estetika. Postproduktsiya [Relational Aesthetics. Postproduction]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2016, 215 p.

25. Groys B. Politika poetiki [Politics of Poetics]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2012, 400 p.

26. Urban G. Metaculture: How Culture Moves through the World. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press Publ., 2001, 336 p.