Dutch Flower Still Life of 17th Century: Interest and Oblivion through the Centuries

Over three and a half centuries, the genre of flower still life created by Dutch artists experienced ups of interest and oblivion. There were the maximum assessment of society in the form of high fees of the 17th century artists; the criticism of connoisseurs and art theorists; the neglect in the 19th century and the rise of auction prices and close attention of art critics, manifested from the middle of the 20th century to the present day. In the middle of the 17th century, there was already a hierarchy of genres, based on both the subject and the size of the paintings, which was reflected in the price. Still lifes and landscapes were cheaper than allegorical and historical scenes, but there were exceptions, for example, in the works of Jan Brueghel the Elder and Jan Davidsz. de Heem. Art theorists Willem van Hoogstraten and Arnold Houbraken, resting upon academic tastes, downplayed the importance of still-life painting. Meanwhile, the artists themselves, determining the worth of their paintings, sought for maximum naturalism, and such paintings were sold well.

In the 20th century, this genre attracted the attention of collectors in Europe and the United States. A revival of interest in Dutch still lifes in general, and in flower ones in particular, began in the 20th century, the paintings rose in price at auctions, and collecting them became almost a fashion. Art societies and art dealers of the Netherlands and Belgium organized several small exhibitions of still lifes. The course for studying symbolic messages in still lifes, presented by Ingvar Bergström, is continued by Eddie de Jong, who emphasizes the diverse nature of symbolism in Dutch painting of the 17th century. Svetlana Alpers, on the contrary, criticizes the iconological method and presents the Dutch painting of that period as an example of visual culture. Norman Bryson’s view of Dutch still lifes is formed against the background of the development of a consumer society, economic prosperity and abundance. Finally, there has been an increasing interest in the natural science aspects of flower still-life painting in the researches of the last twenty years. Curiosity, skill, and admiration for nature are the impulses that can still be felt in the images of bouquets and fruits.

1. Brenninkmeijer-De Rooij B. Roots of Seventeenth-Century Flower Painting: Miniatures, Plant Books, Paintings. Leiden, Primavera Pers Publ., 1996, 96 p.

2. Segal S., Alen K. Dutch and Flemish Flower Pieces: Paintings, Drawings and Prints up to the Nineteenth Century. In 2 vol. Leiden-Boston, Brill Publ., 2020, 1232 p.

3. Woude van der A. The Volume and Value of Paintings in Holland at the Time of the Dutch Republic, Art in History — History in Art: Studies in Seventeenth-Century Dutch Culture. USA, The Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities Publ., 1991, pp. 285—331.

4. Mander Karel van. Kniga o khudozhnikakh [A Book about Artists]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika Publ., 2007, 542 p.

5. Weststeijn T. The Visible World Samuel van Hoogstraten’s Art Theory and the Legitimation of Painting in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam University Press Publ., 2008, 475 p.

6. Mérot A. (ed.) Les Conférences de l’Académie royale de peinture et de sculpture au XVIIe siècle. Paris, Ecole nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts, collection Beaux-arts histoire Publ., 1996, 542 p.

7. Lairesse de G. Groot schilderboek. Haarlem, 1707, 400 p.

8. Sluijter E.J. Didactic and Disguised Meanings? Several Seventeenth-Century Texts on Painting and the Iconological Approach to Northern Dutch Paintings of This Period, Art in History — History in Art: Studies in Seventeenth-Century Dutch Culture, The Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities Publ., 1991, pp. 175—209.

9. Vries de L. Jan van Gool als kunstcriticus, Oud Holland, vol. 97, issue 4. Leiden, Brill Publ., 1983, pp. 266—283.

10. Gool van J. De Nieuwe Schouburg der Nederlantsche kunstschilders en schilderessen: Waer in de Levens — en Kunstbedryven der tans levende en reets overleedene Schilders, die van Houbraken, noch eenig ander schryver, zyn aengeteekend, verhaelt worden: In 2 vol. Hague, 1750, vol. 1, XXII, 480 p., vol. 2, XVI, 576 p.

11. Warner R. Dutch and Flemish Fruit and Flower Painters of the XVII-th and XVIII-th Centuries. Amsterdam, Israel B.M. Publ., 1975, 250 p.

12. Bol L.J. Een Middelburgse Brueghel-groep, Oud Holland, 1955, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1—20.

13. Bol L.J. The Bosschaert Dynasty, Painters of Flowers and Fruit. Leigh-on-Sea, F. Lewis Publ., 1960, 108 p.

14. Meijer F.G., Willigen van der A. A Dictionary of Dutch and Flemish Still-Life Painters in Oils, 1525—1725. Leiden, Primavera Pers in Cooperation with the RKD Publ., 2003, 232 p.

15. Bergström I. Dutch Still-Life Painting in the Seventeenth Century. London, Faber and Faber Limited Publ., 1956, 330 p.

16. Panofsky E. Early Netherlandish Painting. Its Origins and Character. USA, Harvard University Press Publ., 1953, 358 p.

17. Kembridzhskaya shkola: teoriya i praktika intellektual’noi istorii [Cambridge School: Theory and Practice of Intellectual History]. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2018, 632 p.

18. Jongh de E. Questions of Meaning. Theme and Motif in Dutch Seventeenth-Century Painting. Leiden, Primavera Pers Publ., 2000, 296 p.

19. Alpers S. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago, University of Chicago Press Publ., 1984, XXVII, 302 p.

20. Bryson N. Looking at the Overlooked: Four Essays on Still-Life Painting. London, Reaktion Books Ltd Publ., 1990, 192 p.

21. Taylor P. Dutch Flower Painting, 1600—1720. Yale University Press Publ., 1995, 240 p.

22. Segal S. A Flowery Past: A Survey of Dutch and Flemish Flower Painting from 1600 until the Present, Exhibition Catalog Noordbrabants Museum, and Kunsthandel P. de Boer. Amsterdam, Gallery P. de Boer Publ., 1982, 128 p.

23. Segal S. A Fruitful Past: A Survey of the Fruit Still Lifes of the Northern and Southern Netherlands from Brueghel till Van Gogh, Exhibition Catalog Herzog Anton-Ulrich — Museum Braunschweig, Kunsthandel P. de Boer. Amsterdam, Gallery P. de Boer Publ., 1983, 147 p.

24. Berger Hochstrasser J. Still Lively: Recent Scholarship on Still-Life Painting, The Ashgate Research Companion to Dutch Art of the Seventeenth Century. London, Routledge Publ., 2016, pp. 43—73.

25. Blunt W. The Art of Botanical Illustration. London, Collins Publ., 1950, 304 p.

26. Swan C. The Uses of Botanical Treatises in the Netherlands, s. 1600, The Art of Natural History: Illustrated Treatises and Botanical Paintings, 1400—1850. Washington, NGW-Stud Hist. Art Publ., 2010, pp. 63—82.

27. Swan C. Art, Science, and Witchcraft in Early Modern Holland: Jacques de Gheyn II (1565—1629), Cambridge University Press Publ., 2005, 272 p.

28. Swan C. The Preparation for the Sabbath by Jacques de Gheyn II, Print Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 4, Print Quarterly Publications, 1999, pp. 327—339.

29. Evropeiskaya poeziya XVII veka [European Poetry of the 17th Century]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya Literatura Publ., 1977, 926 p.