New Theatre-Fans: Empirical Research Experience

Global changes and challenges of the 21st century have significantly changed both the conditions for the social functioning of art and its audience. This has shifted the focus of contemporary research interests from creating a socio-cultural portrait of the viewer to the area of comprehending new forms of cultural consumption, the origins and drivers of cultural activity. These aspects of the socio-cultural dynamics of the theater audiences are discussed in this paper, which continues the publication of the results of a large-scale sociological study of the audience of the Chekhov Moscow Art Theater. Our interest is primarily due to the historically formed special perception of this theater by the public, which distinguishes the Moscow Art Theater from other theaters of the country. Basing on the empirical data of sociological polls of two types — in the theater auditorium and on the Internet — and using the methods of mathematical statistics, we identify those features that most characterize the modern theater audience and reflect fundamentally new trends in its cultural activity. We note the stratification of the theater audience on completely new qualitative grounds and the establishment of a new cultural phenomenon at the forefront of theatrical life — the online theater-fan. To answer the question about the existence of a certain “generic peculiarity” of the Moscow Art Theater audience, which in previous years embodied the legendary Moscow Art Theater tradition, we tried to identify the latent features of the audience that are not reducible to the traditional quantitative measurements of spectator activity. The findings of the study are unexpected. In some ways they disappoint, but at the same time they explain a lot in the current trends of cultural consumption. They supplement the theoretical landscape with empirical data on the qualitative and behavioral characteristics of the modern theater audience and its cultural activity, which is steadily drifting into the online space. Theoretically comprehending the results obtained we fit them into the broad context of international studies of cultural life. So, behind the particular features of specific audience groups, we can catch the manifestations of global cultural processes that determine the current sociodynamics of the audience of art.

1. Ushkarev A.A. (ed.) Moskovskii Khudozhestvennyi teatr. Posle stoletiya. Repertuar i publika: sbornik statei i materialov [Moscow Art Theater. After a Century. The Repertoire and Audience: collected articles and materials]. Moscow, GII Publ., 2011, 312 p.

2. Manheim J.B., Rich R.C. Empirical Political Analysis. Research Methods in Political Science. Moscow, Ves’ Mir Publ., 1997, 544 p. (in Russ.).

3. Ushkarev A.A., Gedovius G.G., Petrushina T.V. Two Representations of the Moscow Art Theater Audience, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2020, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 462—476. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2020-17-5-462-476 (in Russ.).

4. Rubinshtein A.Ya. (ed.) Khudozhestvennaya zhizn’ sovremennogo obshchestva. V 4 t. T. 3: Iskusstvo v kontekste sotsial’noi ekonomii [The Art Life of Modern Society. In 4 volumes. Volume 3: Art in the Context of Social Economy]. St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin Publ., 1998, 353 p.

5. Rubinshtein A.Ya., Fokht-Babushkin Yu.U. (eds.) Ekonomicheskie osnovy kul’turnoi deyatel’nosti. Individual’nye predpochteniya i obshchestvennyi interes. V 3 t. T. 1: Rynok kul’turnykh uslug [Economic Foundations of Cultural Activity. Individual Preferences and Public Interest. In 3 volumes. Volume 1: Cultural Services Market]. St. Petersburg, 2002, 634 p.

6. Ushkarev A.A. Auditoriya iskusstva v sotsial’nykh izmereniyakh [The Audience of Art in Social Dimensions]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2019, 660 p.

7. Kryshtanovsky A.O. Analiz sotsiologicheskikh dannykh s pomoshch’yu paketa SPSS: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov [Analysis of Sociological Data Using the SPSS Package: textbook for universities]. Moscow, GU VShE Publ., 2006, 281 p.

8. Bourdieu P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, Harvard University Press Publ., 1984, 613 p.

9. Bourdieu P. Forms of Capital, Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic Sociology], 2002, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 60—74 (in Russ.).

10. Ateca-Amestoy V., Prieto-Rodriguez J. Forecasting Accuracy of Behavioral Models for the Participation in the Arts, European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, vol. 229, no. 1, pp. 124-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.005.

11. Brida J.G., Dalle-Nogare C., Scuderi R. How Often to a Museum? Motivations Matter, Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series, 2014, no. 16, 25 p.

12. Ushkarev A.A. Cultural Capital as a Driver of Art Consumption, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2018, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 178—187. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-2-178-187 (in Russ.).

13. Mozgot V.G. Musical Taste of Youth, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2012, no. 10, pp. 70—77 (in Russ.).

14. Ushkarev A.A. Art Museum Audience: The Arguments of Consumer Choice, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2018, no. 4, pp. 444—459. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-4-444-459 (in Russ.).

15. Shapinskaya E.N., Kagarlitskaya S.Ya. Pierre Bourdieu: Artistic Taste and Cultural Capital, Massovaya kul’tura i massovoe iskusstvo. “Za” i “protiv” [Mass Culture and Mass Art: Pro and Contra]. Moscow, Gumanitarii Publ., 2003, pp. 431—453 (in Russ.).

16. DiMaggio P. Cultural Capital and School Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of US High School Students, American Sociological Review, 1982, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 189—201. DOI: 10.2307/2094962.

17. Octobre S. La fabrique sexuée des goûts culturels. Construire son identité de fille ou de garçon à travers les activités culturelles, Développement culturel, 2005, no. 150, pp. 1—10.

18. Katz-Gerro T., Jæger M.M. Does Women’s Preference for Highbrow Leisure Begin in the Family? Comparing Leisure Participation among Brothers and Sisters, Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2015, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 415—430. DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2014.995326.

19. Buchmann C., DiPrete T.A. The Growing Female Advantage in College Completion: The Role of Family Background and Academic Achievement, American Sociological Review, 2006, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 515—541. DOI: 10.1177/000312240607100401.

20. Golubovsky A.B. Abnormal Consumption and Entreprise, Khudozhestvennaya zhizn’ sovremennogo obshchestva. V 4 t. T. 3: Iskusstvo v kontekste sotsial’noi ekonomii [The Artistic Life of Modern Society. In 4 volumes. Volume 3: Art in the Context of Social Economy]. St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin Publ., 1998, pp. 260—266 (in Russ.).

21. Katz-Gerro T., Sullivan O. Voracious Cultural Consumption: The Intertwining of Gender and Social Status, Time Society, 2010, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 193—219. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X09354422.

22. Peterson R.A. Understanding Audience Segmentation: From Elite and Mass to Omnivore and Univore, Poetics, 1992, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 243—258. DOI: 10.1016/0304-422X(92)90008-Q.

23. Peterson R.A., Kern R.M. Changing Highbrow Taste: from Snob to Omnivore, American Sociological Review, 1996, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 900—907. DOI: 10.2307/2096460.

24. Prieur A., Rosenlund L., Skjott-Larsen J. Cultural Capital Today. A Case Study from Denmark, Poetics, 2008, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 45—71. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2008.02.008.

25. Notten N., Lancee B., van de Werfhorst H.G., Ganzeboom H.B.G. Educational Stratification in Cultural Participation: Cognitive Competence or Status Motivation, Journal of Cultural Economics, 2015, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 177—203. DOI: 10.1007/s10824-014-9218-1.

26. Lahire B. The Individual and the Mixing of Genres: Cultural Dissonance and Self-Distinction, Poetics, 2008, vol. 36, no. 2—3, pp. 166—188. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2008.02.001.

27. Lizardo O. Can Cultural Capital Theory be Reconsidered in the Light of World Polity Institutionalism? Evidence from Spain, Poetics, 2005, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 81—110. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.02.001.

28. Shakh-Azizova T.K. Repertoire. Scatter of Searches. Afterword to the Period, Moskovskii Khudozhestvennyi teatr. Posle stoletiya. Repertuar i publika: sbornik statei i materialov [Moscow Art Theater. After a Century. The Repertoire and Audience: collected articles and materials]. Moscow, GII Publ., 2011, pp. 287—299 (in Russ.).