The Impact of Cultural Industries on the Development of Performative Art in the Regions
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2023-20-3-302-312
Abstract
The article examines the development of contemporary performative practices in the regions and the influence of cultural industries on them. The concepts of “performance art”, “art activism”, and “happening” are discussed. The dichotomy of exclusive/ mass is revealed: performative art is an exclusive personified creative act, and mass art is presented in the form of typical standardised works that are available for the general public. The question of cultural institutions is highlighted and their influence on the development of actual art in regions and the formation of cultural identity of the city is analysed. The author considers the problem of institutional critique as a tool for the development of cultural industries, confirming a hierarchical vertical hierarchy and levelling the work of artists in a situation of insecurity. There are given examples of how performative art forms cultural environment and becomes a trigger for development of regional cultural industries, creating around itself a field of scientific and philosophical discourse and involving the fields of mass-marketing, advertising, media and related financial components. The author analyses the process of globalisation and demonstrates the most effective way for regional contemporary art to integrate into the general cultural process - to offer innovative forms. Examples of successful implementation of this method are given.
About the Author
Daria S. Belousova
Perm State Institute of Culture
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
18 Gazety Zvezda Str., Permskiy Krai, Perm, 614000, Russia,
ORCID 0009-0004-4275-8706; SPIN 3986-8408
References
1. Mekhontseva O.P. Modern Art as a Subject of Study in Educational Art-Institutions, Chelovek v mire kul’tury [Man in the World of Culture], 2017, no. 4, pp. 82—86 (in Russ.).
2. Fischer-Lichte E. Ehstetika performativnosti [Aesthetics of Performativity]. Moscow, Play&Play, Kanon+ Publ., 2015, 375 p.
3. Gnirenko Yu. Performance as a Phenomenon of Contemporary Russian Art, litresp.ru: digital library. Available at: https://litresp.ru/chitat/ru/%D0%93/gnirenko-yuliya/performans-kak-yavlenie-sovremennogo-otechestvennogo-iskusstva (accessed 25.05.2023) (in Russ.).
4. Goldberg R. Performance Art: From Futurism to the Present. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2020, 320 p. (in Russ.).
5. Lipovetsky M. Violence Performances: “a New Drama” and the Boundaries of Literary Criticism, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Observer], 2008, no. 1 (89), pp. 192—200. Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2008/1/performansy-nasiliya-novaya-drama-i-graniczy-literaturovedeniya.html (accessed 25.05.2023) (in Russ.).
6. Krivtsova Yu.V. Concept Performance: Action, Effectiveness and Efficaciousness of the Modern Art, Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin], 2009, no. 4, pp. 188—191 (in Russ.).
7. Antonyan M.A. The Concept of “Performance” And “Performance Art” in English and Russian Culturies, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta Ser. 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication], 2015, no. 1, pp. 128—134 (in Russ.).
8. Bishop C. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. Moscow, V-A-C Press Publ., 2018. 528 p. (in Russ.).
9. Schechner R. Essays on Performance Theory. Moscow, V-A-C Press Publ., 2020. 488 p. (in Russ.).
10. Osminkin R.S. Participatory Art: from the “Relational Aesthetics” to the Post-Participatory Art, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2016, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 132—139. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2016-1-2-132-139 (in Russ.).
11. Kuklina A. On the Specifics of Performative Practices in the Development of Siberian and Tomsk Contemporary Art. (“New Materiality as a Possible Artistic Trend in Contemporary Art of Tomsk — 2”), Sibirskii arkhiv sovremennogo iskusstva [Siberian Archive of Contemporary Art]. Available at: https://syg.ma/@anastasiia-kuklina/o-spietsifikie-pierformativnykh-praktik-v-razvitii-sibirskogho-i-tomskogho-sovriemiennogho-iskusstva (accessed 13.02.2022) (in Russ.).
12. Novichkov N.V. Urban Art and Mission of Modern City, Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma [Service and Tourism: Current Challenges], 2013, no. 4, pp. 29—37. DOI: 10.12737/1867 (in Russ.).
13. Schechner R. 6 Axioms for Environmental Theatre, The Drama Review. 1968, Vol. 12, no. 3. P. 41—64. DOI: 10.2307/1144353.
14. Pereverzeva M. Kheppeningi Dzhona Keidzha [Happenings by John Cage], LiveJournal. Available at: https://performansist.livejournal.com/228172.html (accessed 25.05.2023) (in Russ.).
15. Flier A.Ya. Cultural Industries in History and Contemporaneity: The Types and Technologies, Informatsionnyi gumanitarnyi portal “Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie” [Informational Portal for the Humanities “Knowledge. Understanding. Skill”], 2012, no. 3. Available at: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2012/3/Flier_Cultural-Industries/ (accessed 25.05.2023) (in Russ.).
16. A New Trend — Dance Performances. Interviews with Members of Apache Crew and Taet Vremya, Bash Today: websait. Available at: https://bash.today/posts/iskusstvo-tantsa-i-performansa (accessed 25.05.2023) (in Russ.).
17. Kozonina A. Strannye tantsy. Teorii i istorii vokrug tantseval’nogo performansa v Rossii [Strange Dances: Theories and Histories around Dance Performance in Russia]. Moscow, Muzei Sovremennogo Iskusstva “Garazh” Publ., 2021, 244 p.
18. Moersch C. Kulturvermittlung as a Collective Term in German-Speaking Areas, Vremya kul’turnoi mediatsii [Time for Cultural Mediation]. Moscow, Muzei Sovremennogo Iskusstva “Garazh” Publ., 2022, pp. 15—16. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/ 19BdyOIcs4GzhgtE77DrVk0NLTZ724C8t/view (accessed 25.05.2023) (in Russ.).
19. Galkin D.V., Kuklina A.Yu. Regional Development of Contemporary Art in Russia: Global Contexts and Local Projects, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal], 2015, no. 397, pp. 65—74. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/397/12 (in Russ.).
20. Girenko V. Everything Comes from Love, Novyi kompan’on: elektronnoe periodicheskoe izdanie [New Companion: online newspaper]. Available at: https://www.newsko.ru/articles/nk-6037287.html (accessed 25.05.2023) (in Russ.).
21. Khaustova A. Blitz: Institutional Criticism, Spectate: webzine about modern culture. Available at: https:// spectate.ru/institutional-critique/ (accessed 25.05.2023) (in Russ.).
22. Lazareva O.V. Cultural Industries: Two Aspects of Comprehension, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2017, vol. 14, No 6, pp. 670—676. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-6-670-676 (in Russ.).
23. Kozhevnikov N.N., Pashkevich N.L. Glocalization: Concepts, Characteristic Features, Practical Aspects, Vestnik Yakutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Yakut State University], 2005, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 111—115 (in Russ.).
24. Galeeva A. Siberian Ironic Conceptualism. Return to the Present, Syg.ma: website. Available at: https://syg.ma/@sreda-obucheniya/anna-galieieva-sibirskii-iroichieskii-kontsieptualizm-vozvrashchieniie-v-nastoiashhieie (accessed 25.05.2023) (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Belousova D.S. The Impact of Cultural Industries on the Development of Performative Art in the Regions. Observatory of Culture. 2023;20(3):302-312. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2023-20-3-302-312
Views:
355
Email this article 