Still Life as Anthropotechnics (On the Material “Vanitas Vanitatis”)

This article is devoted to the allegorical still life of the Baroque era. There is carried out its analysis mainly on the material of the type “Vanitas Vanitatis”, which is a kind of peak of this genre. Using the theoretical constructions of W. Benjamin and G. Deleuze, the author analyzes the still life as a genre that has its own logic, topology, temporality, collapsing into a plot, and a very peculiar “syntax”. In addition, the article outlines the contours of the “life world” that makes this unique artistic phenomenon possible. The author considers still life as a kind of theater of things. The things depicted in it coexist in various ways, sometimes attracting each other, interlocking and forming constellations (eros), sometimes, on the contrary, lining up in opposition, the elements of which reject and simultaneously activate each other (agon), but never in the form of separate objects. An old still life should not only be viewed, but also read and solved. It is a complex text, the semantic unit of which is a thing filled with new conventional meanings. This is what makes it possible to talk about a still life as an allegory. The article reveals that allegory is not just one of the ways of signification, but is a tool of cognition that allows you to see something familiar and usual in the most unexpected perspective, expanding the scope of what is viewed in culture. This fully applies to the old still life, which manifests not only the finest nuances of the Baroque world with its emerging disturbing temporality, but also the mood of the there-being of Self from hope to melancholy. The specificity of this text lies in the representation of a still life in the perspective of philosophical anthropology, that is, from the point of view of its proportionality to a certain type of person. The result of the analysis carried out is the conclusion that the main condition for the possibility of an allegorical still life is the desolate, devoid of self-identity, but demanding existence and capable of becoming an event Self in a world that is rapidly losing its sacred and symbolic shells.

1. Husserl E. Logicheskie issledovaniya. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental’naya fenomenologiya. Krizis evropeiskogo chelovechestva i filosofii. Filosofiya kak strogaya nauka [Logical Investigations. Cartesian Meditations. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. The Crisis of European Man and Philosophy. Philosophy as Rigorous Science]. Minsk, Moscow, AST Publ., Kharvest Publ., 2000, 743 p.

2. Averintsev S.S. Preliminary Notes to the Study of Medieval Aesthetics, Fenomen nesoglasiya v istorii gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk i biografiyakh uchenykh [The Phenomenon of Disagreement in the History of Humanities, Natural Sciences and Biographies of Scientists]. Novosibirsk, Novosibirskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet Publ., 2007, pp. 149—164. Available at: http://ec-dejavu.ru/a-2/Aesthetics.html (accessed 04.11.2022) (in Russ.).

3. Lotman Yu.M. Still Life in the Perspective of Semiotics, Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury i iskusstva [Articles on the Semiotics of Culture and Art]. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2002, pp. 340—348 (in Russ.).

4. Kudryavtsev O.F. (ed.) Kul’tura Vozrozhdeniya: entsiklopediya: v 2 t. T. 2, kn. 1 [Renaissance Culture: Encyclopedia: in 2 volumes. Volume 2, book 1]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2011, 662 p.

5. Bobryk R. Why does a Still Life Need a Table? Kul’tura i tekst [Culture and Text], 1998, no. 3, pp. 27—42 (in Russ.).

6. Zvezdina Yu.N. Emblematika v mire starinnogo natyurmorta: k probleme prochteniya simvola [Emblematics in the World of Old Still Life: On the Problem of Reading the Symbol]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1997, 151 p.

7. Deleuze G. Skladka. Leibnits i barokko [The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 1997, 264 p.

8. Benjamin W. Proiskhozhdenie nemetskoi barochnoi dramy [The Origin of German Tragic Drama]. Moscow, Agraf Publ., 2002, 280 p.

9. Tarasov Yu.A. Gollandskii natyurmort XVII veka [Dutch Still Life of the 17th Century]. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta Publ., 2004, 162 p.

10. Reutin M.Yu. The Medieval “Dance of Death”, Arbor mundi, 2001, no. 8, pp. 9—38. Available at: http://ivgi.org/sites/ivgi.org/files/arbormundi/Arbor8reutin.pdf (accessed 04.11.2022) (in Russ.).

11. Battistini M. Simvoly i allegorii: vizual’nye kody ponyatii v proizvedeniyakh izobrazitel’nogo iskusstva [Symbols and Allegories in Art (A Guide to Imagery)]. Moscow, Omega Publ., 2008, 384 p.

12. Medkova E. The Knave of Diamonds in the Space of Myth, Iskusstvo [Art], 2008, no. 2. Available at: https://art.1sept.ru/article.php?ID=200800207 (accessed 04.11.2022) (in Russ.).

13. Weber M. The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism, Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, pp. 61—272 (in Russ.).

14. Sukhachev V.Yu. “Wolves”: On the Other Side of Man, between God and the Beast, Anthropology: web department of philosophical anthropology. Available at: http://anthropology.ru/ru/texts/sukhach/wolfs.html (accessed 04.11.2022) (in Russ.).

15. Ron M.V. Metamorfozy obraza zerkala v istorii kul’tury [Metamorphoses of the Image of a Mirror in the History of Culture], cand. cult. sci. diss. St. Petersburg, 2004, 256 p.

16. Degtyarev V. Madonna sredi ruin [Madonna among the Ruins]. St. Petersburg, Jaromír Hladík Press Publ., 2022, 72 p.

17. Kochekovskaya N.A. Allegory as a Mode of Temporality in the 20th Century Humanities: Anachronism as a Cultural Practice, Shagi: zhurnal Shkoly aktual’nykh gumanitarnykh issledovanii [Steps: journal of the School of Advanced Studies in the Humanities], 2018, vol. 4, no. 3—4, pp. 36—58. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_36335975_71275918.pdf (accessed 04.11.2022) (in Russ.).

18. Slovar’ antichnosti [A Dictionary of Antiquity]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989, 704 p.

19. Mikhailov A.V. The Poetics of the Baroque, Izbrannoe. Zavershenie ritoricheskoi epokhi [Selected Works. The End of the Rhetorical Era]. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta Publ., 2007, pp. 68—187 (in Russ.).

20. Baadj N.S. Hendrick Andriessen’s “Portrait” of King Charles I, The Burlington Magazine, 2009, no. 151, pp. 22—27.

21. Illyustrirovannaya entsiklopediya simvolov [An Illustrated Encyclopedia of Symbols]. Moscow, Astrel’ Publ., AST Publ., 2007, 723 p.

22. Cooper J. Entsiklopediya simvolov [An Illustrated Encyclopedia of Traditional Symbols]. Moscow, Assotsiatsiya Dukhovnogo Edineniya “Zolotoi Vek” Publ., 1995, 401 p.

23. Losev A.F. Ocherki antichnogo simvolizma i mifologii [Essays on Ancient Symbolism and Mythology]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1993, 959 p.

24. Gudimova S.A. The Principle of Reflection in Baroque Poetics, Kul’turologiya [Cultural Studies], 2017, no. 4 (83), pp. 6—19 (in Russ.).

25. Baudrillard J. Sistema veshchei [The System of Objects]. Moscow, RUDOMINO Publ., 1999, 224 p.

26. Florensky P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny: opyt pravoslavnoi teoditsei v dvenadtsati pis’makh [The Pillar and Ground of the Truth: An Essay in Orthodox Theodicy in Twelve Letters]. Moscow, 1914, 490 p. Available at: https://imwerden.de/pdf/florensky_stolp_i_utverzhdenie_istiny_1914__ocr.pdf (accessed 04.11.2022).

27. Karaskova O., Pirogovskaya M. A Story of Feelings Told through Art: From Medieval Frescoes to Modern Installations: How People Related to the Classic Five Senses in Different Eras, Arzamas.academy. Available at: https://arzamas.academy/materials/1675 (accessed 04.11.2022) (in Russ.).

28. Degtyarev V. Barokko kak svyaz’ i razryv [Baroque as a Connection and Break-Up]. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2021, 233 p.

29. Vygotsky L.S. Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, by W. Shakespeare, Psikhologiya iskusstva [Psychology of Art]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 1998, pp. 340—406 (in Russ.).

30. Didi-Huberman G. To, chto my vidim, to, chto smotrit na nas [What We See, What Looks at Us]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2001, 262 p.

31. Moscovici S. Mashina, tvoryashchaya bogov [The Machine to Make Gods]. Moscow, Tsentr Psikhologii i Psikhoterapii Publ., 1998, 556 p.