Conceptualisation of Youth Sociality in PostSubcultural Research: NeoTribes Theory
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2015-0-2-24-28
Abstract
Investigates the approaches to conceptualising youth cultural studies within the postsubcultural theory. The author argues that the core idea of postsubcultural paradigm is the doubt in the metanarrative of “subculture.” In this situation, the heuristic potential of the new categorical apparatus designed to replace the traditional concept of “subculture” becomes a research subject.
About the Author
Elena I. Bulatova
Санкт-Петербургский государственный экономический университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Straw W. Systems of Articulation, Logics of Change: Communities and Scenes // Popular Music. Cultural studies. - 1991. - 5 (3).
2. Straw W. Scenes and sensibilities, Public. - 2001. - vol. 22/23.
3. Thornton S. Club Cultures: Music, Media, and Subcultural Capital, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1996.
4. Miles S. Youth lifestyles in a changing world. - Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 2000.
5. Chaney D. Lifestyles. - London: Routledge, 1996.
6. Maffesoli M. The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism //Mass Society, trans. D. Smith. - London: Sage, 1996.
7. Bennett A. Subcultures or NeoTribes?: Rethinking the Relationship Between Youth, Style and Musical Taste, Sociology, 1999. - 33(3).
8. Robards B., Bennett A., MyTribe: Postsubcultural manifestations of belonging on social network sites. Griffith University, Issue of Sociology, 2011, 45(2).
9. Singh. A. Live, Streaming Subculture, Springerin, 2000.
10. Muggleton D., Weinzierl R. What is “The Postsubcultural Studies Anyway? // The PostSubcultures Reader / Ed. D. Muggleton, R. Weinzierl. - Oxford: Berg, 2003.
11. Readhed S. The Clubcultures Reader: Readings in Popular Cultural Studies. - Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.
12. Омельченко Е.Л. Молодежный вопрос: поворот к исследованию новых молодежных солидарностей (вступительное слово) // Социологические исследования. - 2013. - № 10.
13. Омельченко Е.Л. Субкультуры, поколения, солидарности? К вопросу концептуализации новых форм коммуникации в молодежной среде // XII Международная научная конференция по проблемам развития экономики и общества. В 4 кн. / отв. ред.: Е.Г. Ясин. - М.: Издат. дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2012. - Кн. 3.
14. Williams J.P. Subcultural Theory: Traditions and Concepts // Polity Press. UK. 2011.
15. Williams J.P. YouthSubcultural Studies: Sociological Traditions and Core Concepts // Sociology Compass. - 2007.-Vol. 1, № 2. - P. 572-593.
16. Cohen P. Subcultural Conflict and Working Class Community. Working Papers in Cultural Studies: 2 University Birmingham, 1972.
17. Алиева Д.Я. Парадигматические сдвиги в социологии повседневности: концепция Мишеля Маффесоли // Социологический журнал. - 1995. - № 1.
18. Maffesoli M. The Return of the Tragic in Postmodern Societies // New Literary History. - 2004. - Vol. 35, 1.
19. Shildrick T.A., MacDonald R. In Defence of Subculture: Young People, Leisure and Social Divisions // Journal of Youth Studies. - 2006. - № 9 (2).
20. Hodkinson P. Goth: Identity, Style and Subculture. - Oxford, Berg, 2002.
21. Hodkinson P. Net. Goth: Internet Communication and (Sub)Cultural Boundaries//The PostSubcultures Reader, Muggleton D. and Weinzeirl R. (eds). - Oxford: Berg, 2003.
22. Hodkinson, P. Youth Cultures: A Critical Outline of Key Debates// Hodkinson, P. and Deicke, W. (eds.), Youth Cultures: Scenes, Subcultures and Tribes. - New York: Routledge, 2007.
23. Hesmondhalgh D. Subcultures, Scenes or Tribes? None of the Above // Journal of Youth Studies. - 2005. - Vol. 8, № 1.
Review
For citations:
Bulatova E.I. Conceptualisation of Youth Sociality in PostSubcultural Research: NeoTribes Theory. Observatory of Culture. 2015;(2):24-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2015-0-2-24-28
Views:
727
Email this article 