

Interference of Cultural Codes of the CIS Countries of Central Asia: Civilizational Transformations
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2024-21-5-452-461
Abstract
For centuries, Turkic peoples have lived in close interaction, which contributed to the formation of similar cultural traditions, languages and customs. This has made them a unique and distinctive historical and cultural area on the map of Eurasia. The study of the interpenetration of cultural codes of the CIS countries of the Central Asian region becomes particularly relevant, as it allows us to identify the main trends and patterns of interference of interacting cultures.
The novelty of the study lies in the methodological approach to the analysis of cultural codes of nations, according to which the interference of cultural codes is considered here as an instrument of cultural interpenetration, which reveals the specific relationship between cultural codes and national identity, as well as identifies the reasons for the universalization of cultural codes of border cultures.
The purpose of this paper is to explore precisely those features of cross-border cultural interaction that fall under the description of cultural interference in its original sense, which implies spontaneous, uncontrolled cultural interpenetration resulting in the strengthening of some characteristics and weakening of others, in the absence of a dominant culture and deliberate influence on the qualitative characteristics of each of the interacting cultures. This publication offers an analysis of the spontaneity and uncontrollability of civilizational transformations of border cultures, acting as a natural process of interference of cultural codes. The research material is the cultural practices of the CIS countries of the Central Asian region.
The main study measures used are conceptual and phenomenological analysis, axiological and analytical research techniques, method of classification analysis, etc.
The study of the CIS countries of Central Asia revealed a number of coinciding elements of culture of these countries, indicating the presence of their common national cultural and civilizational identity, which stem not only from the cultural roots common to these peoples, but also a consequence of cultural interference and integration in the process of centuries of coexistence in the neighboring territories.
About the Author
Radik I. BatyrshinRussian Federation
Interstate broadcasting company “Mir”,
25 Pyatnitskaya Str., Moscow, 115035, Russia
Higher School of Economics (HSE), National Research University,
16, bld. 10 Potapovsky Lane, Moscow, 101000, Russia
ORCID 0000-0001-8859-8366; SPIN 8584-6060
References
1. Ugli B.M.I. Formation and Development of Cultures in the Ancient Central Asian Civilization, International Journal of Health Sciences, 2022, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 386—395. DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v6n7.11005.
2. Goloseeva A.A. Towards the Question of the Types of Cultural Interaction in the Epoch of Globalization, Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta [RGGU Bulletin], 2008, no. 2, pp. 186—201 (in Russ.).
3. Shemyakin Ya.G. Evropa i Latinskaya Amerika: Vzaimodeistvie tsivilizatsii v kontekste vsemirnoi istorii [Europe and Latin America: Interaction of Civilisations in the Context of World History]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2001, 392 p.
4. Filimonova E.A. Vzaimodeistvie v ehvolyutsii kul’tury [Interaction in the Evolution of Culture], Cand. philos. sci. diss. Omsk, 2011, 157 p.
5. Budnik G.A., Koroleva T.V. Kul’turologiya: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie dlya studentov [Cultural Studies: textbook for students]. Ivanovo, Ivanovskii Gosudarstvennyi Ehnergeticheskii Universitet im. V.I. Lenina Publ., 2018, 152 p.
6. Spielberger C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. New York, Academic Press Publ., 2004, 2688 p.
7. Berseneva T.P. Synergy in Culture, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal], 2013, no. 377, pp. 36—44 (in Russ.).
8. Mileshko A.L. Hybridization and Creolization as Modules of Intercultural Interaction Though Dance, Communicology, 2020, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 52—62. DOI 10.21453 / 2311-3065-2020-8-4-52-62 (in Russ.).
9. Koksharov N.V. Interaction of Cultures: Dialogue of Cultures, Kul’turnaya ehvolyutsiya [Cultural Evolution]. 2006, July 25. Available at: https://yarcenter.ru/articles/ethnicworld/dialog/vzaimodeystvie-kultur-dialog-kultur-557/ (accessed 16.09.2024) (in Russ.).
10. Nadirova G.E. Cross-Cultural Interaction Between Central Asia and South Korea, Akhmet Yassawi University. Eurasian Research Institute. Available at: https://www.eurasian-research.org/publication/cross-cultural-interaction-between-central-asia-and-south-korea/ (accessed 16.09.2024).
11. Stepanov N.S. Interference of Waves, Fizicheskaya ehntsiklopediya [Physical Encyclopedia]. Moscow, Sovetskaya Ehntsiklopediya Publ., 1990, vol. 2, pp. 163—164 (in Russ.).
12. Yartsev V.N. (ed.) Lingvisticheskii ehntsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Sovetskaya Ehntsiklopediya Publ., 1990, 682 p.
13. Zherebilo T.V. (ed.) Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov: spravochnoe posobie dlya studentov i aspirantov [Dictionary of Linguistic Terms: reference book]. Nazran, Piligrim Publ., 2005, 376 p.
14. Akhmanova O.S. System, Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov [Dictionary of Linguistic Terms]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2007, pp. 400—402 (in Russ.).
15. Sukhova N.A. Cultural and National Interference in Business Communication, Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv [Proceedings of St. Petersburg State University of Culture and Arts], 2013, vol. 196, pp. 54—57 (in Russ.).
16. Ergazina A.A., Uspanova D.Z. Linguocultural Interference as a Communicative Barriers in the Process of Intercultural Communication, Aktual’nye problemy filologii: materialy II Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Krasnodar, fevral’ 2016 g.) [Actual Problems of Philology: Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference (Krasnodar, February, 2016)]. Krasnodar, Novatsiya Publ., 2016, pp. 136—138. Available at: https://moluch.ru/conf/phil/archive/177/9327/ (accessed 16.09.2024) (in Russ.).
17. Fedorova N.P. Preodolenie lingvokul’turnoi interferentsii v protsesse obucheniya inostrannomu yazyku studentov neyazykovykh vuzov (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka) [Linguocultural Interference Overcoming in the Process of Foreign Language Teaching to Students of Non-Linguistic Universities (on the Material of English Language)], Cand. pedag. sci. diss. abstr. Nizhny Novgorod, 2010, 21 p.
18. Ekimova N.V. The Phenomenon of Communicative Interference in Linguistics, Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2019, no. 10-2 (37), pp. 9—11. DOI: 10.24411/2500-1000-2019-11637 (in Russ.).
19. Poluyakhtova S.V. Learning Model of Overcoming the Intercultural Interference for the Students of Economics, Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research], 2017, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 234—245. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2017-3-1-234-245 (in Russ.).
20. Gelivera L.O. The Competency-Based Approach to Overcoming Sociocultural Interference, Pedagogicheskii zhurnal [Pedagogical Journal], 2020, vol. 10, no. 2/1, pp. 490—500 (in Russ.).
21. Batyrshin R.I., Gurevich L.S. Phenomenological Aspects of the Concepts “National Cultural Identity” and “Cultural Code of the Nation”, Kul’turnaya zhizn’ Yuga Rossii [Cultural Studies of Russian South], 2024, no. 1 (92), pp. 7—18 (in Russ.).
22. Naurzbaeva A.B. Cultural and Civilisational Identity of Central Asia: Aspects of the Formation of a New Model, Kul’turnoe prostranstvo Tsentral’noi Azii: edinstvo v mnogoobrazii: materialy regional’nogo foruma (28—29 noyabrya 2009 g.) [Cultural Space of Central Asia: Unity in Diversity: Proceedings of the Regional Forum (November 28—29, 2009)]. Dushanbe, 2010, pp. 19—25 (in Russ.).
23. Baidarov E. Cultural and Civilisational Foundations for Regional Integration in Central Asia, Central Asian Analytical Network. 2017, June 21. Available at: https://www.caa-network.org/archives/9492 (accessed 06.09.2024) (in Russ.).
24. Abdullaeva U.I., Sagdullaev AS., Togaev J.E. Migrations and Ethnocultural Processes in Central Asia (Eneolithic and Bronze Age), Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2021, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1182—1190. DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-0788.
25. Lichman E.Yu., Melekhova K.A. Art of Central Asia in Historical and Cultural Context, Kul’turnoe nasledie Sibiri [Cultural Heritage of Siberia], 2018, vol. 1, no. 25, pp. 211—219 (in Russ.).
26. Kosolapov A.I., Marshak B.I. Stennaya zhivopis’ Srednei i Tsentral’noi Azii (istoriko-khudozhestvennoe i laboratornoe issledovanie) [Wall Painting of Middle and Central Asia (Historical and Artistic and Laboratory Research)]. St. Petersburg, Formika Publ., 1999, 80 p.
27. Melekhova K.A. Role of Artistic Traditions in Mongolian Art, Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice], 2016, no. 6 (68), part 2, pp. 131—134 (in Russ.).
28. Nizamov A. Our Ancestors Sat at One Dastarkhan, ASIA-Plus: Media Group. 2020, September 29. Available at: https://asiaplustj.info/ru/news/opinion/20200929/asliddin-nizamov-nashi-predki-stoletiyami-sideli-za-odnim-dastarhanom (accessed 16.09.2024) (in Russ.).
29. Suleimenov A. The Commonality of Cultural Values of Turkic Peoples, Qazaqstan tarihy. 2021, March 31. Available at: https://e-history.kz/ru/news/show/32529 (accessed 16.09.2024) (in Russ.).
30. Rossabi M. Central Asia: A Historical Overview, Asia Society. Available at: https://asiasociety.org/central-asia-historical-overview (accessed 16.09.2024).
- Current usage in the humanities of the term "interference," which in physics denotes "a mutual increase or decrease in the amplitude of coherent waves when they overlap each other," is rather common.
- However, in most cases, a negative connotation prevails in the interpretation of interference: in linguistics, it indicates a "deviation from the norm and the language system," in psychology, a "deterioration in the preservation of memorized material," and in cultural studies, an "unconscious substitution by a person of cultural facts of another country with phenomena of his ethnic culture.
- The analysis of cultural practices of border cultures that originated and developed in a single geopolitical space and have common cultural roots refutes this postulate. The interference of cultures leads to an increase in the cultural significance of their common cultural codes.
- Cultural interference proves its dualism: it can be both negative and positive.
Review
For citations:
Batyrshin R.I. Interference of Cultural Codes of the CIS Countries of Central Asia: Civilizational Transformations. Observatory of Culture. 2024;21(5):452-461. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2024-21-5-452-461