Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

Inclusion Policy and Ethnic Identity in the Context of Openness to the Other

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2016-13-6-652-659

Abstract

When implementing the policy of inclusion and/or integration, there is a number of contradictions related to “self” (“I”) and “the other”, which are the key aspect of this policy. The article shows that when you try to integrate the social “other” in the framework of the poli cy of inclusion, i.e. with preservation of the features of “the other”, these conflicts naturally arise, because the defini tion of any identity (including the collective “I”) is inse parable from the differentiation from others, which was de scribed by Hegel. Therefore, it is not without reason that the most productive approach to the interpretation of eth nic identity as defining of the own collective “I” is the con struction and reproduction of boundaries with “the others” (F. Barth). In addition, I. Neumann’s discussion on the use of constructing “the other” in the international relations shows that not only the national “I” is constituted by dis tinguishing from others, but also “the other” is constitu ted with respect to the identity of “I”. In this regard, the ar ticle attempts to substantiate the thesis that the universal aspect of the mutual constitution of “I” and “the other”, as individuals (including ethnic identity), is the definition of human existence as a boundary, or openness to “the oth er”. Moreover, the locality of implementation of the uni versal aspect of this mutual constitution gives rise to both the contradictions in relations of “I” and “the other” as an individual, and the incompatible approaches to determin ing the nature of “I” and “the other” (e. g., the construc tivism and primordialism in ethnic studies or the construc tionism and essentialism in studies of disability).

About the Author

Alexey Yu. Shemanov
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Russian Federation


References

1. Slee R. Beyond Special and Regular Schooling? An Inclusive Education Reform Agenda, International Studies in Sociology of Education, 2008, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 99—116.

2. Ainscow M., Sandill A. Developing Inclusive Education Systems: the Role of Organisational Cultures and Leadership, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2010, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 401—416.

3. Konventsiya o pravakh invalidov [Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities], United Nations. Available at: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull (accessed 31.07.2016).

4. Khukhlaev O.E., Chibisova M.Yu., Shemanov A.Yu. Inklyuzivnyi podkhod v integratsii detei-migrantov v obrazovanii [Inclusive Approach to the Integration of Migrant Children in Education], Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2015, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 15—27.

5. The Social Inclusion Agenda, Social Inclusion. Available at: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/142909/20130920-1300/www.socialinclusion.gov.au/index.html (accessed 31.07.2016).

6. Nazarova N.M. K probleme razrabotki teoreticheskikh i metodologicheskikh osnov obrazovatel’noi integratsii [To the Problem of Development of Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Educational Integration], Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2011, no. 3, pp. 5—11.

7. Malofeev N.N. Spetsial’noe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom : v 2 ch. Ch. 1: Zapadnaya Evropa [Special Education in Russia and Abroad: in 2 Parts. Part 1: Western Europe]. Moscow, Pechatnyi Dvor Publ., 1996, 182 p.

8. Leongard E.I., Krasnova N.A., Pirozhnik N.T., Prudnikova M.S. Inklyuzivnoe obrazovanie v razlichnykh usloviyakh integratsii [Inclusive Education in Diff erent Conditions of Integration], Inklyuzivnoe obrazovanie [Inclusive Education], Moscow, 2010, issue 1, pp. 139—148.

9. Hickey-Moody A. “Turning Away” from Intellectual Disability : Methods of Practice, Methods of Thought, Critical Studies in Education, 2003, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1—22.

10. Fischer R. Cross-Cultural Training Eff ects on Cultural Essentialism Beliefs and Cultural Intelligence, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2011, vol. 35, pp. 767—775.

11. Shemanov A.Yu. Voploshchennost’ lichnosti i resursy inklyuzii: ot psikhologicheskoi k sotsiokul’turnoi perspektive [The Embodiment of Personality and Inclusion Resources: from Psychological to Sociocultural Perspective, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observarory of Culture], 2014, no. 5, pp. 15—22.

12. Chernyak L.S. “Voploshchennost’ lichnosti i inklyuziya”: meditatsii postoronnego [Individuality as Embodiment of Culture and the Problem of Inclusion: an Outsider’s Perspective], Observatoriya kul’tury [Observarory of Culture], 2015, no. 3, pp. 4—12.

13. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Mille Plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Ekaterinburg, Moscow, U-Faktoriya Publ., Astrel’ Publ., 2010, 895 p. (in Russ.)

14. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? Moscow, St. Petersburg, Institut Eksperimental’noi Sotsiologii Publ., Aleteiya Publ., 1998, 288 p. (in Russ.)

15. Deleuze G. La Philosophie critique de Kant. Moscow, PER SE Publ., 2000, 351 p. (in Russ.)

16. Spinoza B. Etika [Ethics], Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works], vol. 1, Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1957, pp. 359—618.

17. Hegel G.W.F. Phänomenologie des Geistes, Sochineniya [Works], vol. IV. Moscow, Sotsial’no-Ekonomicheskoi Literatury Publ., 1959, 438 p. (in Russ.)

18. Hegel G.W.F. Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften. Hauptteile 1. Wissenschaft der Logik. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1974, 452 p. (in Russ.)

19. Neumann I. Uses Of The Other: “The East” in European Identity Formation. Moscow, Novoe Publ., 2004, 336 p. (in Russ.)

20. Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Refl ections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Moscow, Kanon-Press-Ts Publ., Kuchkovo Pole Publ., 2001, 288 p. (in Russ.)

21. Perepelkin L.S. Konstruktivizm v etnologii: teoriya i praktika [Constructivism in Ethnology: the Theory and Practice], Voprosy sotsial’noi teorii [Issues of Social Theory], vol. VII, issues 1—2, 2013—2014, pp. 59—72.

22. Taylor Ch. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge (Mass.), London, 1991, 142 p.

23. Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 1997, 451 p. (in Russ.)

24. Chernyak L.S. Vnenakhodimost’ v dialogike: samodeterminatsiya mysli i determinatsii vnemyslennye, Vladimir Solomonovich Bibler, Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2009, pp. 10—128.

25. Chernyak L.S. Vremya i vechnost’: Vozvrashchenie zabytoi temy [Time and Eternity: the Return of the Forgotten Theme]. Moscow, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2014, 696 p.

26. Gibelev I.V., Rumyantsev O.K. Otkrytost’ granitsy zhiznennogo mira i ee reprezentatsiya [The Openness of the Life World and Its Representations], Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2014, no. 3, pp. 11—18.


Review

For citations:


Shemanov A.Yu. Inclusion Policy and Ethnic Identity in the Context of Openness to the Other. Observatory of Culture. 2016;13(6):652-659. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2016-13-6-652-659

Views: 1071


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)