Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

Legacy of the Silver Age in the Artistic Works of the Painting Section of the Moscow City Committee of Graphic Artists (1970s—1980s)

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-2-247-252

Abstract

Thearticle focuses on the creative interpretation of the Silver Age traditions in the paintings of the younger generation of Moscow unoffi cial art — “Semidesyatniki [Seventiers]”. Such an aspect has never been analyzed in a study of unoffi cial art before. Identifying the linkages with the national artistic tradition is an actual perspective for the studies of unoffi cial art, whose emergence is mainly associated with infl uence of the Western European art of the second half of the 20th century. The genesis of the unoffi cial art, in the “post-thaw” period, is closely related to the appeal to the art of the turn of the 19th—20th centuries — the largest epoch of the Russian art, closest to the artists of the second half of the 20th century — and was directly perceived through its representatives. The article outlines the circle of artists of the Painting Section of the City Committee (Gorkom) of Graphic Artists, whose works refl ected the thematic and stylistic principles of the Silver Age. The artistic principles of symbolism, such as the understanding of light and forms in space, were the basis of the teaching methodo logy in alternative pedagogy (V.Ya. Sitnikov’s Studio). The ability of the artists of Semidesyatniki to comprehend the symbolism and semantics of light, space, colour, as well as some of their stylistic and technical (stroke, smear) methods go back to the art of the “Blue Rose”. The infl uence of symbolism can be noticed in the interpretation of mythological and female images and artefacts of the Silver Age. The interest of the unoffi cial artists in the art of symbolism is related to the fi rst manifestations of postmodernism in the Russian painting, which indicates its earlier emergence and profound infl uence on various genres and directions of art.


About the Author

Anna K. Florkovskaya
V.I. Surikov Moscow State Academic Art Institute under the Russian Academy of Arts
Russian Federation


References

1. Florkovskaya A.K. Neofitsial’noe iskusstvo 1970-kh: vozniknovenie zhivopisnoi sektsii moskovskogo gorkoma grafikov [Unofficial Art of the 1970s: Rise of the Pictorial Section of the Moscow Gorkom (City Committee) of Graphic Artists], Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2016, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 240— 247.

2. Vasilii Sitnikov. Uroki [Vasily Sitnikov. Lessons]. Moscow, Agei Tomesh-Press Publ., 1998, 70 p.

3. Vasilii Sitnikov i ego shkola. Katalog vystavki. Galereya “Nashi khudozhniki” [Vasily Sitnikov and his School. The Exhibition Catalogue. Gallery “Our Artists”]. Mos-cow, 2009, 284 p.

4. Florkovskaya A.K. Tvorcheskii metod khudozhnikov “Goluboi rozy”. K voprosu o shkole Borisova-Musatova [The Creative Method of the “Blue Rose” Artists. To the Question about the School of Borisov-Musatov], V.E. Borisov-Musatov i “saratovskaya shkola”. Materialy VII Bogolyubovskikh chtenii, posvyashchennykh 130-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V.E. Borisova-Musatova. Saratov. 11— 14 aprelya 2000 [V.E. Borisov-Musatov and the “Saratov School”. Proceedings of the 7th Bogolyubov Readings, Dedicated to the 130th Anniversary since the Birth of V.E. Borisov-Musatov. Saratov. 11—14 April, 2000]. Saratov, 2001, pp. 112—121.

5. Florkovskaya A.K. Stil’ “Goluboi rozy” skvoz’ prizmu teorii Genrikha Vel’fl ina [The Style of “Blue Rose” through the Prism of the Theory of Heinrich Wölffl in]. Moscow, 2008, pp. 176—185.

6. Florkovskaya A.K. Obraz i material v iskusstve simvolizma. Zhivopis’ khudozhnikov “Goluboi rozy” i problema materiala v teoriyakh russkikh simvolistov [The Image and Material in the Art of Symbolism. Paintings of the Artists of “Blue Rose” and the Problem of the Material in the Theories of Russian Symbolists], Modern i evropeiskaya khudozhestvennaya integratsiya: materialy mezhdunar. konf. [Modern Art and European Artistic Integration: the Proceedings of Intern. Conf.]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 178—185.

7. Prigozhin I.R. Konets opredelennosti. Vremya, khaos i novye zakony prirody [The End of Certainty. Time, Chaos, and New Laws of Nature]. Izhevsk, NITs “Regulyarnaya i Khaoticheskaya Dinamika” Publ., 2000, 208 p.

8. Shcherbatov S. Khudozhnik v ushedshei Rossii [The Artist in the Bygone Russia]. Moscow, 2000, 688 p.

9. Rusakova A.A. Simvolizm v russkoi zhivopisi [Symbolism in the Russian Painting]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1995, 451 p.

10. Florkovskaya A.K. Neofitsial’noe iskusstvo 1970-kh: vozniknovenie zhivopisnoi sektsii moskovskogo gorkoma grafikov [Unofficial Art of the 1970s: Rise of the Pictorial Section of the Moscow Gorkom (City Committee) of Graphic Artists], Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2016, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 240— 247.

11. Vasilii Sitnikov. Uroki [Vasily Sitnikov. Lessons]. Moscow, Agei Tomesh-Press Publ., 1998, 70 p.

12. Vasilii Sitnikov i ego shkola. Katalog vystavki. Galereya “Nashi khudozhniki” [Vasily Sitnikov and his School. The Exhibition Catalogue. Gallery “Our Artists”]. Mos-cow, 2009, 284 p.

13. Florkovskaya A.K. Tvorcheskii metod khudozhnikov “Goluboi rozy”. K voprosu o shkole Borisova-Musatova [The Creative Method of the “Blue Rose” Artists. To the Question about the School of Borisov-Musatov], V.E. Borisov-Musatov i “saratovskaya shkola”. Materialy VII Bogolyubovskikh chtenii, posvyashchennykh 130-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V.E. Borisova-Musatova. Saratov. 11— 14 aprelya 2000 [V.E. Borisov-Musatov and the “Saratov School”. Proceedings of the 7th Bogolyubov Readings, Dedicated to the 130th Anniversary since the Birth of V.E. Borisov-Musatov. Saratov. 11—14 April, 2000]. Saratov, 2001, pp. 112—121.

14. Florkovskaya A.K. Stil’ “Goluboi rozy” skvoz’ prizmu teorii Genrikha Vel’fl ina [The Style of “Blue Rose” through the Prism of the Theory of Heinrich Wölffl in]. Moscow, 2008, pp. 176—185.

15. Florkovskaya A.K. Obraz i material v iskusstve simvolizma. Zhivopis’ khudozhnikov “Goluboi rozy” i problema materiala v teoriyakh russkikh simvolistov [The Image and Material in the Art of Symbolism. Paintings of the Artists of “Blue Rose” and the Problem of the Material in the Theories of Russian Symbolists], Modern i evropeiskaya khudozhestvennaya integratsiya: materialy mezhdunar. konf. [Modern Art and European Artistic Integration: the Proceedings of Intern. Conf.]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 178—185.

16. Prigozhin I.R. Konets opredelennosti. Vremya, khaos i novye zakony prirody [The End of Certainty. Time, Chaos, and New Laws of Nature]. Izhevsk, NITs “Regulyarnaya i Khaoticheskaya Dinamika” Publ., 2000, 208 p.

17. Shcherbatov S. Khudozhnik v ushedshei Rossii [The Artist in the Bygone Russia]. Moscow, 2000, 688 p.

18. Rusakova A.A. Simvolizm v russkoi zhivopisi [Symbolism in the Russian Painting]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1995, 451 p.


Review

For citations:


Florkovskaya A.K. Legacy of the Silver Age in the Artistic Works of the Painting Section of the Moscow City Committee of Graphic Artists (1970s—1980s). Observatory of Culture. 2017;14(2):247-252. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-2-247-252

Views: 1025


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)