Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

“Postfolk Dance”: Investigating a Phenomenon of Modern Dance

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-4-425-430

Abstract

The idea of synthesis, compilation, collaboration of contemporary dance with folk elements can be seen in various works of modern choreographers. This kind of synthesis is aimed to enrich modern dance with energy and vitality; it is a know-how of modern Russian choreographers. Thus, there is a current need to define this phenomenon, as it appeared in theoretical discourse.

This article investigates a phenomenon of contemporary dance, which has never been theorized before (hereinafter “postfolk dance”). The author makes an effort to distinguish the term “postfolklore” (existing in the modern Russian folklore studies) and the term “postfolk dance”, introduced by the author, by using a comparison chart. The chart shows some similarities and differences in using the term “postfolk” in the studies of modern folklore and contemporary dance (six positions). As a result, “postfolk dance” is defined as quite a new phenomenon in professional postmodern choreography, appearing due to development of interdisciplinary processes and multimedia integrating in modern art techniques. Dance pieces of modern choreographers, where contemporary dance structure is combined with folk elements, creating a certain signature style, are given as examples, i. e. a subject of possible investigation.

About the Author

Anna S. Polyakova
Liberal Arts University
Russian Federation
19, Studencheskaya Str., Yekaterinburg, 620049


References

1. Mankovskaya N.B. Estetika postmodernizma [The Aesthetics of Postmodernism]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2000, pp. 20—21.

2. Zaks L.A.The End of the 20th Century: The Fatigue of Culture, the Reification of Spirit, Ural’skaya filosofskaya shkola i ee vklad v razvitie sovremennoi filosofii [The Ural Philosophical School and its Contribution to the Development of Modern Philosophy]. Yekaterinburg, Ural’skii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet Publ., 1996, p. 161 (in Russ.).

3. Ilyin I.P. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm [Poststructuralism. Deconstructivism. Postmodernism]. Available at: http://www.nietzsche.ru/influence/philosophie/iliin/?curPos=12 (accessed 10.02.2017).

4. Vasenina E.V. Sovremennyi tanets postsovetskogo prostranstva [Modern Dance of the Post-Soviet Space]. Moscow, Balet Publ., 2013, p. 5.

5. Gusev V.E. Folklore as a Universal Type of Subculture, Sbornik k 80-letiyu professora M.S. Kagana [The Collection Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of Professor M.S. Kagan]. St. Petersburg, 2001, issue 4, p. 320 (in Russ.).

6. Blok L.D. Klassicheskii tanets. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [Classical Dance. The History and Modernity]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1987, pp. 25—26.

7. Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [The Aesthetics of Verbal Art]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya Literatura Publ., 1979, 412 p.

8. Vasenina E.V. Istoriya matreshki [The History of Matryoshka], Teatr [Theatre], 2015, no. 20, pp. 54 — 62.

9. Ustyakhin S.V. Trends in the Development of Folk Dance as a Direction of Modern Choreography, Diskursus-5 (materialy aspirantskogo seminara) [Diskursus-5 (The Materials of Postgraduate Seminar)]. Saransk, Komitet Gosudarstvennoi Statistiki Respubliki Mordoviya Publ., 2005, pp. 57—61 (in Russ.).

10. Kuryumova N.V. Non-Classical Dance as a Cultural Model of Neurotic Corporeality, Omskii nauchnyi vestnik. Seriya “Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’” [Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series: Society. History. Modernity]. Omsk, Omskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta Publ., 2010, issue 5 (91), pp. 234—238 (in Russ.).

11. Neklyudov S.Yu. Posle fol’klora [After Folklore], Zhivaya starina [Living Antiquity], 1995, no. 1, pp. 2—4.

12. Yadryshnikova L. G. Low Culture: On the Concept, Summa filosofii [The Sum of Philosophy]. Yekaterinburg, Ural’skii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet Publ., 2006, pp. 222—224 (in Russ.).

13. Yadryshnikova L.G. Fol’klor i postfol’klor v kul’turnykh praktikakh povsednevnosti [Folklore and Postfolklore in the Cultural Practices of Everyday Life], Cand. cult. diss. Abstr. Yekaterinburg, 2008, 27 p.

14. Neklyudov S.Yu. The Folklore of Modern City, Sovremennyi gorodskoi fol’klor [Modern City Folklore]. Moscow, Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennyi Gumanitarnyi Universitet, 2003, pp. 5—24 (in Russ.).

15. Petrochenko N.V. Folk Dance in Modern Conditions: On the Concept and Research Methodology, Kul’turologiya, kul’tura i iskusstvo v sovremennom rossiiskom sotsiume [Cultural Studies, Culture and Art in the Modern Russian Society]. Kemerovo, Kemerovskii Gosudarstvennyi Universitet Kul’tury i Iskusstva Publ., 2008, pp. 391—401 (in Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Polyakova A.S. “Postfolk Dance”: Investigating a Phenomenon of Modern Dance. Observatory of Culture. 2017;14(4):425-430. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-4-425-430

Views: 1683


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)