Frame and Texture: On the Organization of Space in Andrei Tarkovsky’s Films
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-4-458-466
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of visual space organization in Andrei Tarkovsky’s films. This work precisely focuses on the frame, which is a border between different spaces and types of representation inside the image, and the texture, which is considered in connection with the concept of natura naturans, meaning “Nature naturing”. Tarkovsky often constructs his shot in such an order that to create an illusion of existence of multiple dimensions inside it. In his mise en scenes we can frequently see windows, doors, pictures, mirrors, which we can name “frames inside the frame”. In addition, the film director used to choose special textures, which the viewer is unable to identify. Due to deformation of scale, the spectator cannot understand what is depicted on the screen. Tarkovsky shoots such objects and surfaces that can create fantastic landscapes. The camera can find in an ordinary object something unusual, in a finite one — infinity. The substance seems to create new forms in itself, which refers us to the concept of natura naturans. These methods are used almost in all Tarkovsky’s films. His aim was to transform pictorial problematics into a purely cinematic thing, turning its spatial elements into temporal ones, which is the main principle of his visual style.
About the Author
Stepan V. FedotkinRussian Federation
3, Vilgelma Pika Str., Moscow, 129226
References
1. Tarkovsky A. Lektsii po kinorezhissure [Lectures on Film Directing]. Moscow, Lenfil’m Publ., 1989, 120 p.
2. Batkin L. Ne boyas’ svoego golosa [Without Fear of Your Voice], Mir i fil’my Andreya Tarkovskogo [The World and Films of Andrei Tarkovsky]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1990, pp. 98—141.
3. Deleuze G. Kino [Cinema]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 2004, 624 p.
4. Salynsky D. Kinogermenevtika Tarkovskogo [Tarkovsky’s Cinehermeneutics]. Moscow, Kvadriga Publ., 2009, 576 p.
5. Andrei Tarkovskii: Arkhivy, dokumenty, vospominaniya [Andrei Tarkovsky. Archives, Documents, Memoirs]. Moscow, Eksmo-Press Publ., Podkova Publ., 2002, 464 p.
6. Richie D. Ozu. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2014, 264 p.
7. Blom I. Frame, Space, Narrative. Doors, Windows and Mobile Framing in the Films of Luchino Visconti, Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies, 2010, no. 2, pp. 91—106.
8. Perez G. The Point of View of a Stranger: An Essay on Antonioni’s “Eclipse”, The Hudson Review, 1991, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 234—262.
9. Tarasenko V. Belyi, belyi den’ Andreya Tarkovskogo. Ch. 2 [White, White Day of Andrey Tarkovsky. Part 2], Televidenie i radioveshchanie [Broadcasting], 1990, no. 2, pp. 29—33.
10. Tarkovsky A. Beseda o tsvete [Conversation on Color], Kinovedcheskie zapiski [Notes on Film Studies], 1988, no. 1, pp. 147—154.
11. Tarkovsky A. Vstat’ na put’ [Stand on the Way], Iskusstvo kino [The Art of Cinema], 1989, no. 2, pp. 109—130.
12. Surkova O. Tarkovskii i ya: Dnevnik pionerki [Tarkovsky and I. A Pioneer’s Diary]. Moscow, Zebra E Publ., 2002, 487 p.
13. Batkin L. Leonardo da Vinchi i osobennosti renessansnogo tvorcheskogo myshleniya [Leonardo da Vinci and the Features of the Renaissance Creative Thinking]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1990, 415 p.
14. Da Vinci L. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v 2 t. [Selected Works: in 2 Volumes]. Moscow, Ladomir Publ., 1995, vol. 2, 489 p.
15. Spinoza B. Kratkii traktat o Boge, cheloveke i ego schast’e: Traktat ob usovershenstvovanii razuma. Etika [Short Treatise on God, Man and his Well-Being. On the Improvement of the Understanding. Ethics]. Moscow, Mir Knigi Publ., Literatura Publ., 2010, 480 p.
16. Argan G.C. Istoriya ital’yanskogo iskusstva: v 2 t. [History of Italian Painting: in 2 Volumes]. Moscow, Raduga Publ., 1990, vol. 2, 239 p.
Review
For citations:
Fedotkin S.V. Frame and Texture: On the Organization of Space in Andrei Tarkovsky’s Films. Observatory of Culture. 2017;14(4):458-466. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-4-458-466