Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

Art Museum Audience: The Arguments of Consumer Choice

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-4-444-459

Abstract

Diversification of artistic supply and growing competition in the market of cultural services lead to the fact that the quality of artistic product (performance, concert, exhibition) is perceived as increasingly relative and loses its former importance as a decisive argument of consumer choice. What guides people in their communication with art? What are the determinants of their consumer behavior and are there any patterns in it? The chance of overcoming communication barriers and establishing a constructive dialogue between cultural institutions and their potential audience depends on whether the answers to these and other questions will be found. The article deals with the cultural aspect of this interaction — the role of motivation and individual preferences in art consumption, their influence on people’s cultural activity. The article is based on the results of a large-scale sociological study of visitors to the State Tretyakov Gallery, conducted by a research group from the State Institute of Art Studies. The museum’s audience was studied not only by the objective parameters traditionally described by art sociologists, but also by a number of difficult-to-measure content features that go far beyond socio-demographic descriptions. The study allows us to get closer to understanding some general patterns of consumer behavior in art, to determine the nature of consumer motivations and individual preferences’ influence on cultural choice. The article proves the existence of a statistically significant connection between these subjective behavioral determinants and the measure of personal cultural capital. The use of methods of mathematical statistics and econometrics expands the traditional potential of sociology of art and provides a qualitatively new level of reliability of results.

About the Author

Aleksandr A. Ushkarev
State Institute for Art Studies
Russian Federation
5, Kozitsky Lane, Moscow, 125009, Russia


References

1. Ushkarev A.A. Art Museums Audience: The History and Methodology of Study Abroad, Kul’tura i iskusstvo [Culture and Art], 2017, no. 6, pp. 63—77 (in Russ.).

2. Ushkarev A.A. Art Museums Audience: The History and Methodology of Study in Russia, Kul’tura i iskusstvo [Culture and Art], 2017, no. 7, pp. 36—49 (in Russ.).

3. Falk J.H. Understanding Museum Visitors’ Motivations and Learning. Available at: https://slks.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/dokumenter/KS/institu tioner/museer/Indsatsomraader/Brugerundersoegelse/Artikler/John_Falk_Understanding_muse um_visitors__motivations_and_learning.pdf (accessed 26.06.2018).

4. Scott C., Dodd J., Sandell R. Cultural Value. User Value of Museums and Galleries: A Critical View of the Literature, University of Leicester, Research Center for Museums and Galleries, 2014. Available at: http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/museumstudies/rcmg/publications/cultural-value-of-mu seums (accessed 26.06.2018).

5. Gallup Kompas, Kantar Gallup. Available at: http://www.gallup.dk/services/gallup-kompas (accessed 02.02.2018).

6. Motivaction. Research and Strategy. Available at: https://www.motivaction.nl/ (accessed 26.06.2018).

7. Museums: Knowledge, Democracy and Transformation. Copenhagen, Danish Agency for Culture Publ., 2014, 260 p.

8. Jensen J.T., Lundgaard I.B. Knowledge, Democracy and Transformation, Museums: Knowledge, Democracy, Transformation. Copenhagen, Danish Agency for Culture Publ., 2013, pp. 8—67.

9. Falk J.H., Dierking L.D. The Museum Experience Revisited. Walnut Creek, CA, Left Coast Press Publ., 2013, 416 p.

10. Jones C. Enhancing Our Understanding of Museum Audiences: Visitor Studies in the Twenty-first Century, Museum & Society, 2015, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 539—544.

11. Solomon M.R., Bamossy G., Askegaard S., Hogg M.K. Mentality-model van Motivaction, Consumentengedrag. Deel 5: Cultuur en Europese levensstijlen. Amsterdam, Pearson Benelux Publ., 2013, pp. 317—319.

12. Brida J.G., Dalle-Nogare C., Scuderi R. How Often to a Museum? Motivations Matter, Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series, 2014, no. 16. Available at: http://pro1.unibz.it/projects/economics/repec/bemps16.pdf (accessed 28.06.2018).

13. Brida J.G., Meleddu M., Pulina M. Factors Influencing the Intention to Revisit a Cultural Attraction: The Case Study of the Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art in Rovereto, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2012, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 167—174.

14. Brida J.G., Disegna M., Scuderi R. The Behaviour of Repeat Visitors to Museums: Review and Empirical Findings, Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 2014, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 2817—2840.

15. Frateschi C., Lazzaro E., Palma Martos L. A Comparative Econometric Analysis of Museum Attendance by Locals and Foreigners: the Case of Padua and Seville, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 2009, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 175—196.

16. Gil S.M., Ritchie J.R.B. Understanding the Museum Image Formation Process — a Comparison between Residents and Tourists, Journal of Travel Research, 2009, no. 4, pp. 480—493.

17. Jeong J.-H., Lee K.-H. The Physical Environment in Museums and its Effects on Visitors’ Satisfaction, Building and Environment, 2006, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 963—969.

18. Ushkarev A.A. Cultural Capital as a Driver of Art Consumption, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2018, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 178—187 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-2-178-187.

19. Ushkarev A.A. Auditoriya posetitelei Gosudarstvennoi Tret’yakovskoi galerei: Programma sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya [The Audience of Visitors to the State Tretyakov Gallery: Sociological Study Program]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennyi Institut Iskusstvoznaniya Publ., 2015, 48 p.

20. Manheim J.B., Rich R.C. Research Methods in Political Science. Moscow, Ves’ Mir Publ., 1997, 542 p. (in Russ.).

21. Rubinshtein A.Ya. (ed.) Khudozhestvennaya zhizn’ sovremennogo obshchestva: v 4 t. T. 3. Iskusstvo v kontekste sotsial’noi ekonomii [The Artistic Life of Modern Society: in 4 volumes. Volume 3. Art in the Context of Social Economy]. St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin Publ., 1998, 351 p.

22. Rubinshtein A.Ya., Fokht-Babushkin Yu.U. (eds). Ekonomicheskie osnovy kul’turnoi deyatel’nosti. Individual’nye predpochteniya i obshchestvennyi interes: v 3 t. T. 1. Rynok kul’turnykh uslug. Publika teatra 90-kh godov [Economic Foundations of Cultural Activity. Individual Preferences and Public Interest: in 3 volumes. Volume 1. Cultural Services Market: The Audience of the Theater of the 90s]. St. Petersburg, 2002, 634 p.

23. Kul’tura Rossii, 2000-e gody [Russian Culture, the 2000s]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2012, 863 p.

24. Rubinshtein A.Ya. Publika kontsertov “Motsart-marafona”: opyt sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya [The Audience of “Mozart Marathon” Concerts: A Sociological Study Experience]. Moscow, Institut Ekonomiki RAN Publ., 2014, 79 p.

25. Ushkarev A.A. Modern Experience of Theatre Audience Sociological Study, Kul’tura v fokuse nauchnykh issledovanii. Po materialam konferentsii pamyati B.Yu. Sorochkina: sbornik nauchnykh statei [Culture in the Focus of Scientific Research. On the Materials of the Conference in Memory of B.Yu. Sorochkin: collected articles]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennyi Institut Iskusstvoznaniya Publ., 2017, pp. 63—88 (in Russ.).

26. Khudozhestvennye vystavki [Art Exhibitions]. Available at: https://yunc.org/%D0%A5%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%B8 (accessed 26.06. 2018).

27. Bourdieu P. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1977, pp. 171—183.

28. Nasledov A. SPSS 19: Professional’nyi statisticheskii analiz dannykh [SPSS 19: Professional Statistical Analysis of Data]. Moscow, Piter Publ., 2011, 399 p.

29. Patsiorkovsky V.V., Patsiorkovskaya V.V. SPSS dlya sotsiologov: ucheb. posobie [SPSS for Sociologists: tutorial]. Moscow, Institut Sotsial’no-Ekonomicheskikh Problem Narodonaseleniya RAN Publ., 2005, 432 p.

30. Oberemko O.A. (ed.) Sotsiologicheskie metody v sovremennoi issledovatel’skoi praktike: sb. statei, posvyashchennyi pamyati pervogo dekana fakul’teta sotsiologii NIU VShE A.O. Kryshtanovskogo [Sociological Methods in the Modern Research Practice: Collected Articles Dedicated to the Memory of the First Dean of the Faculty of Sociology of the A.O. Kryshtanovsky National Research University Higher School of Economics]. Moscow, NIU VShE Publ., 2011, 558 p.

31. Zangieva I.K., Rotmistrov A.N. Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables: A Comparative Study, Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes], 2018, no. 3, pp. 29—46 (in Russ.).

32. Ushkarev A.A. Tretyakov Gallery: Determinants of Attendance, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2017, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 558—568 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-5-558-568.

33. Bourdieu P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, Harvard University Press Publ., 1984, pp. 404—429.

34. Shapinskaya E.N., Kagarlitskaya S.Ya. Pierre Bourdieu: Artistic Taste and Cultural Capital, Massovaya kul’tura i massovoe iskusstvo: “Za” i “protiv” [Mass Culture and Mass Art: “Pros” and “Cons”]. Moscow, Gumanitarii Publ., 2003, pp. 431—453 (in Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Ushkarev A.A. Art Museum Audience: The Arguments of Consumer Choice. Observatory of Culture. 2018;15(4):444-459. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-4-444-459

Views: 1180


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)