Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

Iconostasis in the Liturgical and Church-Historical Contexts

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2019-16-5-488-493

Abstract

The article deals with study and attribution of rare portable iconostases (“movable church”). Their features include the Sovereign tier (with the Royal Doors) absence, the small size, and the four remaining tiers (Deisis, Great Feasts, Prophets, and Patriarchs) painted on one board. Portable iconostases were used during long pilgrimages, missionary trips, or military campaigns, as well as in Bezpopovtsy (priestless) houses of worship.

In liturgical practice, both in ancient times and now, portable iconostases were used under certain circumstances for long journeys. They are easy to set up in any place, whether it is a house, a tent or a field. In the 16th century, embroidered iconostases, rapidly installable in field and stationary conditions, were brought along in military campaigns. Thus, in his military campaigns, Emperor Alexander I used a silk-painted iconostasis made by masters of the Moscow Kremlin Armory. Movable chur­ches were also used in remote and sparsely populated areas (for example, in the Olonets Governorate). The services were held in a big house and lasted for two or three days.

There were quite a lot of portable iconostases in the past, but only few of them have been preserved, among which there are rather peculiar ones, shaped as cupboards, nightstands, kiots. At the beginning of the 20th century, an iconostasis icon was painted with five tiers on one board.

About the Author

Margarita M. Loyevskaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

1, Building 13, Leninskie Gory Str., Moscow, 119991, Russia

ORCID 0000-0001-5190-178X; SPIN 3022-5360



References

1. Florensky P. Ikonostas [Iconostasis]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1995, 254 p.

2. Uspensky L.A. Iconostasis Question, Vestnik Russkogo zapadno-evropeiskogo patriarshego ekzarkhata [Bulletin of the Russian West European Patriarchal Exarchate], 1963, no. 44, pp. 223—255 (in Russ.).

3. Yazykova I.K. Bogoslovie ikony [Icon Theology]. Moscow, Obshchedostupnogo pravoslavnogo Universiteta Publ., 1995, 207 p.

4. Troitsky N.I. Iconostasis and its Symbolism, Ikonostas: Proiskhozhdenie, razvitie, simvolika [Iconostasis: Origin, Development, Symbolism]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2000, pp. 137—162 (in Russ.).

5. Filatov V.V. Kratkii ikonopisnyi illyustrirovannyi slovar’ [Brief Iconographic Illustrated Dictionary]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1996, 222 p.

6. Old Testament Trinity, Ikonografiya vostochno-khristianskogo iskusstva: proekt nauchnogo otdela fakul’teta Tserkovnykh khudozhestv Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta [Eastern Christian Art Iconography: A Project of the Scientific Department of the Church Arts Faculty of the St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University]. Available at: http://icons.pstgu.ru/needlework/2243 (accessed 30.05.2019) (in Russ.).

7. Tsekhanskaya K.V. Ikonopochitanie v russkoi traditsionnoi kul’ture [Icon-Worship in Russian Traditional Culture]. Moscow, 2004, 255 p.

8. Yukhimenko E.M. Bezpopovtsy, Pravoslavnaya entsiklopediya [Orthodox Encyclopedia]. Moscow, Tserkovno-Nauchnyi Tsentr “Pravoslavnaya Entsiklopediya” Publ., 2002, vol. 4, pp. 702—724 (in Russ.).

9. Trenev D.K. “Pokhodnaya tserkov’” v vide shkafchika XVII veka v Serpukhovskom monastyre [“Mo­vable Church” Shaped as a Cupboard of the 17th Century in the Serpukhov Monastery]. Moscow, 1902, 32 p.


Review

For citations:


Loyevskaya M.M. Iconostasis in the Liturgical and Church-Historical Contexts. Observatory of Culture. 2019;16(5):488-493. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2019-16-5-488-493

Views: 967


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)