Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search

Music as Synergy and Non-Classical Model of Man

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2020-17-1-4-15

Abstract

The article explores the phenomenon of music from the viewpoint of Man. In the philosophy of music, the connection with man is getting relevant, replacing the positivism, as well as the speculatism, common to music theories in the past, when formal logical methods were used.

The article focuses on the connection between man’s personal experience, his or her anthropological energy, that is the one that comes from the innermost foundations and utmost underlying feelings of the person (horror, pain, happiness, delight, and self-transcendence), and specific musical energy. In this rendering, we rest on the philosophical concept of the outstanding modern Russian thinker Sergey Khoruzhy. He describes man as an energetic entity formed by a limit-experience, which is the experience of reaching the limits of existence and consciousness. The synergistic approach to man continues the non-classical philosophical tradition of building the model of man using the categories like “energy”, “self-practice”, “limit-experience”, “constitution of man” and excluding the categories like “entity”, “substance”, “subject” present in the classical vision of man in European philosophy of the 17th—19th centuries.

The anthropological component of the non-classical synergistic concept of music includes the comprehension of man through a certain typification of man’s striving to reach the limits. This philosophical anthropology depicts man opening up to the ontological, ontical and virtual limits.

Music, as such synergy, stands for a projection of man, thus becoming the music of ontological, ontical and virtual striving. From this point of view, not only a specific concept of music is formed, different from other concepts, such as the concepts of music as a number and as an expression, but also an approach to the entire historical musical legacy and to musical practice, including composer’s, performer’s and listener’s activities.

About the Author

Lyudmila M. Gribanova
International Slavic Institute
Russian Federation

9, Building 25,Godovikova Str., Moscow, 129085, Russia

ORCID 0000-0003-2605-7649; SPIN 7143-5879



References

1. Boëthius A.M.S. The Instruction to Music, Muzykal’naya estetika zapadnoevropeiskogo Srednevekov’ya i Vozrozhdeniya [Musical Aesthetics of the Western European Middle Ages and Renaissance]. Moscow, Muzyka Publ., 1966, pp. 153— 167 (in Russ.).

2. Adorno T.W. Aesthetic Theory: (Theory and History of Literature). Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press Publ., 1998, 376 p.

3. Kurenkova R.A. Etyudy k fenomenologicheskoi estetike muzyki: monografiya [Etudes to the Phenomenological Aesthetics of Music: monograph]. Vladimir, VlGU Publ., 2015, 200 p.

4. Dilthey W. Sketches and Criticism of Historical Reason. Application. Understanding of Music, Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 1988, no. 4, pp. 135— 152 (in Russ.).

5. Pike A. Foundational Aspects of Musical Perception. A Phenomenological Analysis, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1974, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 429— 434.

6. Ingarden R. The Work of Music and the Problem of Its Identity, Issledovaniya po estetike [Research on Aesthetics]. Moscow, Inostrannoi Literatury Publ., 1962, pp. 403—570. (in Russ.).

7. Langer S.K. Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite and Art. Cambridge, Harvard University Press Publ., 1974, 313 p.

8. Hartmann N. Estetika [Aesthetics]. Moscow, Inostrannoi Literatury Publ., 1958, 692 p.

9. Ferrara L. Phenomenology as a Toll for Musical Analysis, The Musical Quarterly, 1984, vol. LXX, no. 3, pp. 355—373.

10. Khoruzhy S.S. Fonar’ Diogena. Kriticheskaya retrospektiva evropeiskoi antropologii [Diogenes’ Lantern. A Critical Retrospect of European Anthropology]. Moscow, Institut Filosofii, Teologii i Istorii sv. Fomy Publ., 2010, 688 p.

11. Khoruzhy S.S. Ocherki sinergiinoi antropologii [Essays on Synergetic Anthropology]. Moscow, Institut Filosofii, Teologii i Istorii sv. Fomy Publ., 2005, 408 p.

12. Asafyev B.V. Muzykal’naya forma kak protsess [Musical Form as a Process], book 1—2. Leningrad, Muzgiz Publ., 1963, 378 p.

13. Konson G.R. Boleslav Leopoldovich Yavorsky, Problemy muzykal’noi nauki [Music Scholarship], 2012, no. 1, pp. 165—170. Available at: http://journalpmn.com/index.php/PMN/article/view/426/419 (accessed 10.08.2019) (in Russ.).

14. Konson G.R. A. Losev — B. Asafyev: Parallel Interpretations, Problemy muzykal’noi nauki [Music Scholarship], 2010, no. 1 (6), pp. 21—25. Available at: http://journalpmn.com/index.php/PMN/article/viewFile/592/591 (accessed 10.08.2019) (in Russ.).

15. Kurth E. Osnovy linearnogo kontrapunkta: Melodicheskaya polifoniya Bakha [Foundations of Linear Counterpoint: Bach’s Melodic Polyphony]. Moscow, Muzgiz Publ., 1931, 304 p.

16. Kurth E. Romanticheskaya garmoniya i ee krizis v “Tristane” Vagnera [Romantic Harmony and its Crisis in Wagner’s “Tristan”]. Moscow, Muzyka Publ., 1975, 552 p.

17. Losev A.F. Muzyka kak predmet logiki [Music as a Subject of Logic]. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2012, 205 p.

18. Medushevsky V.V. Dukhovnyi analiz muzyki [Spiritual Analysis of Music]. Moscow, Kompozitor Publ., 2014, 630 p.

19. Zenkin K.V. Muzyka. Eidos. Vremya. A.F. Losev i gorizonty sovremennoi nauki o muzyke [Music — Eidos — Time. A.F. Losev and Horizons of the Modern Musicology]. Moscow, Pamyatniki Istoricheskoi Mysli Publ., 2015, 462 p.

20. Klyuev A.S. What Is the Music from the Point of View of Synergetics, Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie. (Terra Humana) [Society. Environment. Development. (Terra Humana)], 2010, pp. 125—129. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/chto-takoe-muzyka-s-tochki-zreniya-sinergetiki (accessed 11.08.2019).

21. Foucault M. Germenevtika sub’’ekta [The Hermeneutics of the Subject]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2007, 677 p.

22. Lipov A.N. The Composer John Cage’s Experimental Music and the Problems of the American Musical Avant-Garde of the 20th Century, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2017, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 702—709 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-6-702-709.

23. Erokhin V. Phonomontage, Pragmatronics, Logography. Historical and Theoretical Notes on Some Non-Traditional Forms of Musical Art, Muzykal’naya akademiya [Musical Academy], 1997, no. 2, pp. 123—133 (in Russ.).

24. Kirillova N.B. “Virtual Reality” and “Virtualization of Culture” as Concepts of Modern Cultural Studies, Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2017, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 524—531 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2017-14-5-524-531.


• The synergistic philosophy of music allows one to understand different types of music, understand why one composition strikes a chord and another one does not, and to avoid harsh critics.
• In the traditional point of view, music is seen as an abstract entity separate from man; while a synergistic approach looks at music in the sphere of human practice.
• The concept of synergistic music is based on a non-classical philosophy, which is why it claims to be original and relevant.
• The take on music through the model of a human now is in trend; it makes it possible to respond to the challenges of the present time, to predict the development of musical art in the future.

Review

For citations:


Gribanova L.M. Music as Synergy and Non-Classical Model of Man. Observatory of Culture. 2020;17(1):4-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2020-17-1-4-15

Views: 1557


ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)