

Postmodernism in Russian Metropolitan Architecture in the 1990s—2010s: Rethinking as a Leading Principle
https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2025-22-4-376-385
Abstract
Philosophical thought was one of the factors influencing Russian and, in particular, metropolitan architecture — sometimes explicitly, consciously, more often “by naivety” or with reference to world architectural practice. It formed the cultural atmosphere, the intellectual movement, which in fact disavowed the cultural tautology of the matrix of modernism and, more broadly, the ideological framework of the Art Nouveau era. Just as Romanticism, and later Neo-Romanticism, turned to different epochs and cultures, so postmodernism is inclined to stare intensely into the horizon, to wander, to perceive the old as an occasion for the creation of the new. Hence its keen interest in such literary tropes as metaphor and allusion, its penchant for quotations and references, its acceptance of bricolage as a projection of a mythological type of consciousness. The author categorizes postmodern concepts that have influenced architecture into two groups: established concepts reinterpreted in postmodernism and new postmodern ideas. This article is devoted to the former, in which such concepts as metaphor, quotation, allusion, collage and bricolage are considered in their reflection on the Moscow architecture at the turn of the 20th—21st centuries. Their brief characterization is given, and examples of their embodiment in architectural practice are considered in more detail, in particular, if we talk about the metaphor of the catamaran house, the hill house, the ship house, etc. It is emphasized that the influence of postmodernist concepts on Russian capital architecture is uneven: while the stage of the 1990s — early 2000s is marked by an appeal to quotation, metaphor, allusion, collage and bricolage remain relevant throughout the 1990s—2010s. In addition to architecture, the identified postmodernist ideas have influenced other types of Russian artistic practice, from literature and music to cinema and visual arts. This list can be extended to include other postmodernist concepts reflected in Russian capital architecture of the turn of the 20th—21st centuries, among them irony, play, double coding, nostalgia, palimpsest.
About the Author
Dmitry E. FesenkoRussian Federation
“Architectural Bulletin” Journal, 7 Granatny Lane., Moscow, 123001, Russia
Moscow Humanitarian University, 5 Yunosti Str., Moscow, 111395, Russia
ORCID 0009-0001-4175-9078; SPIN 7288-3852
References
1. Barthes R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poehtika [Selected Works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989, 615 p.
2.
3. Levi-Strauss C. The Savage Mind. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1994, 384 p. (in Russ.).
4.
5. Derrida J. Of Grammatology. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 2000, 511 p. (in Russ.).
6.
7. Lyotard J.-F. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2016, 159 p. (in Russ.).
8.
9. Jameson F. Postmodernism and Consumer Society, Logos: philosophical and literary journal. Available at: https://ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2000_4/10.htm (accessed 04.04.2025) (in Russ.).
10.
11. Foucault M. The Archaeology of Knowledge. St. Petersburg, Gumanitarnaya Akademiya Publ., 2020, 413 p. (in Russ.).
12.
13. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Yekaterinburg, U-Faktoriya Publ., 2007, 670 p. (in Russ.).
14.
15. Baudrillard J. Simulacra and Simulations. Moscow, Postum Publ., 2015, 238 p. (in Russ.).
16.
17. Jencks Ch. The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. Moscow, Stroiizdat Publ., 1985, 137 p. (in Russ.).
18.
19. Kristeva J. Semiotika. Issledovaniya po semanalizu [Semiotics. Studies on Semanalysis]. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2013, 285 p.
20.
21. Danilova E.V. Bernard Tschumi’s Architectural Intertext, Gradostroitel’stvo i arkhitektura [Urban Construction and Architecture], 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 90—97. DOI: 10.17673/Vestnik.2022.01.11 (in Russ.).
22.
23. Markuzon V.F. Metaphor and Comparison in Architecture, Arkhitektura SSSR [Architecture of the USSR], 1939, no. 5, pp. 57—59 (in Russ.).
24.
25. Aristotle. Poetics, Ehtika. Politika. Ritorika. Poehtika. Kategorii [Ethics. Politics. Rhetoric. Poetics. Categories]. Minsk, Literatura Publ., 1998, pp. 1064—1112 (in Russ.).
26.
27. Dobritsyna I.A. Ot postmodernizma — k nelineinoi arkhitekture. Arkhitektura v kontekste sovremennoi filosofii i nauki [From Postmodernism to Nonlinear Architecture. Architecture in the Context of Modern Philosophy and Science]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2004, 416 p.
28.
29. Pavlikova A. Headquarters Are Not Necessarily Skyscrapers. Aeroflot — Russian Airlines Office Complex on the International Highway, Arkhitekturnyi Vestnik [Architectural Bulletin], 2009, no. 6 (111), pp. 72—81 (in Russ.).
30.
31. Zorya A.A. Typology of Quotation in the Art of the Second Half of the 20th Century, Aktual’nye problemy teorii i istorii iskusstva : sbornik nauchnykh statei. Vyp. 2. [Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: collected articles. Issue 2]. St. Petersburg, NP-Print Publ., 2012, pp. 334—340 (in Russ.).
32.
33. Fesenko D. Fasad/Razrez, Rossiiskaya arkhitektura 1990—2000-kh gg. [Facade/Section. Russian Architecture of the 1990s—2000s]. Moscow, Arkhitekturnyi Vestnik Publ., 2008, 526 p.
34.
35. Kruglikov V. Postmodernism. A Kind of Return to Art, Adindex: website. 2011, 21 November. Available at: https://adindex.ru/publication/gallery/2011/11/21/82552.phtml?ysclid=m9cnbh75lw294889147 (accessed 11.04.2025) (in Russ.).
36.
37. Savkin K. Transformation. Factory and Office Center on Novodanilovskaya Embankment, Arkhitekturnyi vestnik [Architectural Bulletin], 2009, no. 4 (109), pp. 74—83 (in Russ.).
38.
39. Vasiliev N.Yu. Kollazh v zarubezhnom dizaine 1960—1990-kh godov kak prototip arkhitekturnogo formoobrazovaniya [Collage in Foreign Design 1960—1990-s as a Prototype of Architectural Morphogenesis], Cand. art hist. diss. abstr. Moscow, 2011, 23 p.
40.
41. Ermolaev A.P. Slovar’ dizainera dlya raboty v XXI veke [The Designer Dictionary for Work in the 21st Century]. Moscow, 1998, 178 p.
42.
43. Baburov V. (ed.) Aleksandr Zosimov: “Paper Architecture Eliminates the Need to Compromise”, Arkhitekturnyi Vestnik : website, 2021, March 25. Available at: https://archvestnik.ru/2021/03/25/aleksandr-zosimov-bumazhnaya-arkhitektura-izbavlyayet-ot-neobkhodimosti-idti-na-kompromiss/ (accessed 11.04.2025) (in Russ.).
44.
45. Stroeva O.V. The Models of Production of Modern Culture: Bricolage and Deconstruction. Rock Painting of Megalopolises, Filosofiya i obshchestvo [Philosophy and Society], 2014, no. 2, pp. 135—141 (in Russ.).
46.
47. Fadeeva M. Jump on the Spot, or an Attempt to Fly Away, Arkhitekturnyi vestnik [Architectural Bulletin], 2009, no. 6 (111), pp. 92—95 (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Fesenko D.E. Postmodernism in Russian Metropolitan Architecture in the 1990s—2010s: Rethinking as a Leading Principle. Observatory of Culture. 2025;22(4):376-385. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2025-22-4-376-385