Preview

Observatory of Culture

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Monument as a Cultural Text

https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2026-23-2-116-128

Abstract

This article explores the culture of perpetuation as a relevant practice for preserving historical and cultural heritage in contemporary urban landscapes. Issues of cultural and historical memory have become particularly relevant in today’s rapidly changing society. Monuments, as cultural texts, not only preserve historical and cultural heritage but also actively participate in shaping the modern urban environment, ensuring the continuity of generations and preserving cultural identity. The study of monuments as cultural texts is linked to changing sociocultural paradigms in diachronic dynamics, as well as to cultural aspects reflecting social, emotional, and identity processes in society. The aim of the article is to conceptualize the monument as a structural and semantic category possessing a set of attributes and characteristics inherent in cultural texts, within the context of diachronic narratology. Contextualization is becoming a crucial principle in obtaining cultural knowledge. Using monuments and memorial sites in Belarusian cities as examples, this article attempts to substantiate these forms of memory and analyzes their essence and significance in the context of the phenomenon of absence. This article examines forms of spontaneous memorialization as a sociocultural contextualization of events in contemporary culture. It provides examples of how spontaneously emerging sites of memory undergo the process of institutionalization. The novelty of this study stems from the emergence of new forms of memory, which acquire specific characteristics distinct from those of artifacts in previous historical periods. These include, monuments created using augmented reality technologies and digital projects. The intertextuality of monuments allows them to become part of contemporary culture, transforming them from historical relics into relevant components of cultural memory. This article concludes with a discussion of the prospects for further study of monuments as cultural texts, and a comprehensive understanding of the cultural context of their existence, amidst the expansion of humanities knowledge about the culture of memory and the diversity of relationships between text and culture.

About the Author

Olga M. Sokolova
Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts
Belarus

17 Rabkorovskaya Str., Minsk, 220007, Belarus

ORCID 0000-0002-5213-8410; SPIN 8654-1452;



References

1. Lévi-Strauss C. Anthropologie Structurale. Paris, Plon Publ., 1958, 454 p.

2. Lotman Yu.M., Uspensky B.A. On the Semiotic Mechanism of Culture, Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Scientific Notes of Tartu State University. Works on Sign Systems]. Tartu, 1971, vol. 5, pp. 144—166 (in Russ.).

3. Lotman Yu.M. Semiotics of Culture and the Concept of Text, Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 t. [Selected Articles: in 3 volumes]. Tallinn, Aleksandra Publ., 1992, vol. 1, pp. 129—132 (in Russ.).

4. Kosikov G.K. (ed.) Frantsuzskaya semiotika: Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu [French Semiotics: From Structuralism to Poststructuralism]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 2000, 536 p.

5. Benjamin W. A Berlin Chronicle, Shok pamyati: Avtobiograficheskaya poehtika Val’tera Ben’yamina i Osipa Mandel’shtama [Shock of Memory: The Autobiographical Poetics of Walter Benjamin and Osip Mandelstam]. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2005, pp. 165—208 (in Russ.).

6. Barthes R. From Work to Text, Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poehtika [Selected Works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989, pp. 413—423 (in Russ.).

7. Serteau M. de. Walking in the City, Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological Review], 2008, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 24—38 (in Russ.).

8. Warburg A. Velikoe pereselenie obrazov: issledovanie po istorii i psikhologii vozrozhdeniya antichnosti [The Great Migration of Images: A Study in the History and Psychology of the Renaissance of Antiquity]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika Publ., 2008, 382 p.

9. Halbwachs M. La Mémoire Collective. Paris, Les Presses Universitaires de France Publ., 1967, Deuxième Édition Revue et Augmentée, 204 p.

10. Halbwachs M. The Collective Memory, Pamyat’ o voine 60 let spustya: Rossiya, Germaniya, Evropa [Memory of War 60 Years Later: Russia, Germany, Europe]. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2005, pp. 16—50 (in Russ.).

11. Halbwachs M. Les Cadres Sociaux de la Mémoir. Paris, 1925, 211 p.

12. Nora P. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire, Representations, 1989, no. 26, pp. 7—24.

13. Nora P. World Celebration of Memory, Neprikosnovennyi Zapas, 2005, no. 2, pp. 202—208 (in Russ.).

14. Lotman Yu.M. Memory in Cultural Studies, Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 t. [Selected Articles: in 3 volumes]. Tallinn, Aleksandra Publ., 1992, vol. 1, pp. 200—202 (in Russ.).

15. Assmann J. Das Kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und Politische Identität in Frühen Hochkulturen. Munich, Verlag C.H. Beck, 1992, 344 p.

16. Assmann A. Erinnerungsräume Formen und Wandlungen des Kulturellen Gedächtnisses. München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 1999, 424 p.

17. Ricoeur P. Memory, History, Forgetting. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Gumanitarnoi Literatury, 2004, 728 p. (in Russ.).

18. Shub M.L. Commemoration Phenomenon: An Experience of Culturological Analysis of Public Commemoration Practices (By the Example of Chelyabinsk Streets Naming), Observatoriya kul’tury [Observatory of Culture], 2018, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 161—169. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2018-15-2-161-169 (in Russ.).

19. Hutton P.H. History as an Art of Memory. Hanover, London, University of Vermont Publ., 1993, 255 p.

20. Hirsch M. Family Pictures: Maus, Mourning, and Post-Memory, Discourse, 1993, vol. 15, no. 2, Special Issue: The Emotions, Gender, and the Politics of Subjectivity, pp. 3—29.

21. Hoskins A. Digital Network Memory, Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin, De Gruyter Publ., 2009, pp. 91—106.

22. Assmann A. Dlinnaya ten’ proshlogo: Memorial’naya kul’tura i istoricheskaya politika [The Long Shadow of the Past: Memorial Culture and Historical Politics]. Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2014, 328 p.

23. Olik J. Figurations of Memory: A Process-Relational Methodology Illustrated on the German Case, Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological Review] 2012, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 40—74 (in Russ.).

24. Suvorov N.N. Cultural Monument as Imaginary of Reality, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury [Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Culture and Arts], 2017, no. 4, pp. 76—80 (in Russ.).

25. Smirnova A.A., Leonov I.V., Kirillov I.V. Absence as a Monument. Article 1, Chelovek. Kul’tura. Obrazovanie [Human. Culture. Education], 2023, no. 1, pp. 65—82 (in Russ.).

26. Smirnova A.A., Leonov I.V., Kirillov I.V. Absence as a Monument. Article 2, Chelovek. Kul’tura. Obrazovanie [Human. Culture. Education], 2023, no. 3, pp. 41—58 (in Russ.).

27. Ezhegodnik Obshchestva arkhitektorov-khudozhnikov [Yearbook of the Society of Architect-Artists]. Leningrad, Izdanie Leningradskogo Soyuza Sovetskikh Arkhitektorov Publ., 1935, issue XIV, 282 p.

28. Palace-Monument, Ogonyok, 1925, no. 12 (103), 19 p. (in Russ.).

29. Fesenko D., Yakovleva G. On Primitivism in Soviet Architecture, Intelros — Intellektual’naya Rossiya: sait [Intelros — Intellectual Russia: website]. Available at: http://www.intelros.ru/subject/figures/teoriy_arh_processa/6775-o-primitive-v-sovetskoj-arxitekture.html (accessed 24.03.2025) (in Russ.).

30. Sokol K.G. The Eastern Front of World War I: Attitudes Toward Old Monuments and the Emergence of New Ones, Problemy sokhraneniya pamyati i memorializatsii naslediya Pervoi mirovoi voiny: materialy nauchno-prakticheskogo kruglogo stola 12 oktyabrya 2017 g. [Problems of Preserving Memory and Memorializing the Heritage of World War I: Materials from the Scientific and Practical Roundtable Discussion on October 12, 2017]. Moscow, Institut Naslediya Publ., 2019, pp. 68—76 (in Russ.).

31. Korotkevich V. Chernyi zamok Ol’shanskii: roman, Dikaya okhota korolya Stakha: povest’ [The Black Castle of Olshansky: novel, The Wild Hunt of King Stakh: story]. Minsk, 1984, 527 p.

32. Sokolova O.M. Kommemoratsiya v gorodskom prostranstve: gorod kak mesto kul’turno-istoricheskoi pamyati: monografiya [Commemoration in Urban Space: The City as a Place of Cultural and Historical Memory: monograph]. Minsk, BGUKI Publ., 2022, 490 p.

33. Sokolova O.M. Monument as a Marker of Identity, Dialog kul’tur i tsivilizatsii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov Mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo foruma, Moscow, 11—14 aprelya 2024 g. [Dialogue of Cultures and Civilizations: Proceedings of the International Scientific Forum, Moscow, April 11—14, 2024]. Moscow, 2024, pp. 273—280 (in Russ.).


  • The monument as a cultural text actively participates in the formation of the modern urban environment.
  • The intertextuality of monuments allows them to become part of modern culture, transforming them from historical relics into relevant components of cultural memory.
  • Absence, loss or existence in an imaginary reality expands the aspects of contextualization of the monument.
  • Representation of the past is ensured by both direct access to memory and mediated access in media forms, new forms of virtual memory and spontaneous memorialization, when ordinary people – readers of urban space – create their own places of memory using informal tactics.

Review

For citations:


Sokolova O.M. Monument as a Cultural Text. Observatory of Culture. 2026;23(2):116-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2026-23-2-116-128

Views: 197

JATS XML

ISSN 2072-3156 (Print)
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)