CULTURAL REALITY
- The images of Berlin - the enemy capital at the time of its fall - are unexpectedly widely represented in Soviet graphics of 1945.
- The visual images of the Nazi capital presented a combination of the symbols of Berlin, well known to every Soviet person, and the chronicle of the military events of May 1945.
- The transition from front-line graphics to peacetime graphics, so vividly presented in Berlin landscapes, was accompanied by complexity of artistic methods and strong subjective views of the artists.
An artist who finds themselves in the last days of a war in the enemy’s defeated capital may not just fix its objects dispassionately. Many factors influence the selection and depicturing manner of the objects. One of the factors is satisfaction from the accomplished retribution, awareness of the historical justice triumph. Researchers think such reactions are inevitable. The article offers to consider from this point of view the drawings created by Soviet artists in Berlin in the spring and summer of 1945. Such an analysis of the German capital’s visual image is conducted for the first time. It shows that the above reactions were not the only ones. The graphics of the first post-war days no less clearly and consistently express other feelings and intentions of their authors: the desire to accurately document and fix the image of the city and some of its structures in history, the happiness from the silence of peace, and the simple interest in the monuments of European art.
The article examines Berlin scenes as evidences of the transition from front-line graphics focused on the visual recording of the war traces to peacetime graphics; from documentary — to artistry; from the worldview of a person at war — to the one of a person who lived to victory. In this approach, it has been important to consider the graphic images of Berlin in unity with the diary and memoir texts belonging to both artists and ordinary soldiers who participated in the storming of Berlin. The combination of verbal and visual sources helps to present the German capital’s image that existed in the public consciousness, as well as the specificity of its representation by means of visual art.
The article presents an analysis of the materials of the International Scientific Conference “Dialogue of Cultures in the Era of Globalization and Digitalization” held in Yekaterinburg on the basis of the Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin. The conference was attended by representatives of universities and cultural institutions of five countries: the Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus, Hungary, the Republic of India, and the People’s Republic of China. The Russian Federation was represented by both the Central District and the regions of the Far East, Siberia and the Urals, as well as a number of autonomous republics: Buryatia, Mordovia, Sakha-Yakutia, and the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug. The number of conference participants, despite the difficult situation of the pandemic in which we all found ourselves, was indicative — 78 people, including 38 doctors of science and 25 candidates of science representing various humanities disciplines, ten university teachers, three postgraduate students and two independent participants.
The conference materials were divided into four sections in accordance with the statement of scientific problems: 1. “Sociocultural Issues and State Cultural Policy in the Era of Globalization”, 2. “Issues of Preservation and Representation of Cultural Heritage of Different Peoples”, 3. “The Internet as a Space for Dialogue and Polylogue of Cultures. New Media Technologies”, 4. “Education and Creativity in the Era of the Digital Revolution”. The conference was attended by many famous scientists — representatives of the humanities of leading Russian universities.
All the materials and speeches of the scientific conference show that it resulted in proof that only culture and intercultural dialogue in the era of chaos and contradictions of the globalized world can neutralize international conflicts and lead the world to harmony and mutual understanding.
IN SPACE OF ART AND CULTURAL LIFE
Research in the field of cross-cultural communications in the context of modern globalization processes is becoming particularly relevant. Each specific case in cross-cultural interaction has a set of specific features that require detailed study. The article discusses the features of Russian-Chinese cross-cultural communication in the field of fine art, which have been especially pronounced since the second half of the 20th century and until now. The analysis of generally accepted types of communication made it possible to show specific forms of interaction between Russia and China.
There is demonstrated that these features are largely related to the fact that the process of cross-cultural interaction occurs not only at the level of communication between representatives of the two peoples, but also in the process of artistic and stylistic exchange at the level of art works perception. Thus, cross-cultural communication refers to the process of information exchange at different levels. Russian-Chinese communication features include the intrapersonal perception of Russian art, style and genre features of the Russian realistic school, that influenced the style of Chinese artists; the interaction between individual artists and students, the unique contacts between a teacher-master and a student studying individually in the art studio. In the period under review, the communications were often unilateral — Chinese students and artists adopting the traditions of the Russian realistic school of painting, both by inviting Russian artists to China and studying in Russia. The specificity is also shown in the interaction between professional creative unions of artists, joint holding of exhibitions, and organization of plein-airs, during which a multi-level exchange of cultures can happen.
- From the standpoint of modernism, art and design are developing cyclically in a spiral with access to a qualitatively new level.
- Postmodernism has looped this progressive forward movement in one plane.
- The creative methods of postmodernism in art and design are redesign and retrodesign.
- The past influences the present, preventing the creation of something truly new in art and design.
- Interpretation, appropriation and reference have replaced true innovation in design and art.
HERITAGE
The article deals with the historical-cultural topic of relations of the Russian animalism with other genres of fine art of the 18th and 19th centuries. When the features of animalistic art were identified as a peculiar and characteristic phenomenon open to interaction, animalism became an original page of Russian culture. The author refers to this topic in connection with the small number of complex studies in the field of animalism. The purpose of the article is to consider the specific features of animalism, as a characteristic original phenomenon of Russian artistic culture, in the context of the existing genre system of the two designated periods. The relevance of the article lies in the fact that the issues of interaction and integration are very significant in historical and modern artistic practice. The demonstration of such “communications” on the example of Russian animalistic painting, graphics, and sculpture further enriches and diversifies the sphere of Russian art, giving it the character of integrity and national color.
The article presents a review of Russian and foreign literature on this topic, indicates that animalism entered the system of genres of Russian art of the 18th—19th centuries as a special “genus” of it, showing an independent status. For two centuries, artists set their task to create an animal’s image in the sphere of the natural reality they observed. The nature they perceived and the animals in it were reflected in different genres of fine art. In the 18th century, when the Academy of Arts and related classes were organized in Russia, animals and birds began to be depicted in historical, battle, landscape paintings, and still lifes. Wild and domestic animals appeared in paintings by foreign and Russian masters. In the 19th century, the horse became one of the most preferred characters in portraiture and sculpture (along with the historical and landscape genre). The author concludes that the historical realities of that time highlighted that image and determined the formation of a separate “hippic genre”.
NAMES. PORTRAITS
- Ballet in the 20th century has become one of the most dynamically developing genres of musical art. Its synthetic nature made it possible to reveal a new vision of the objective of composer's creativity. The Hungarian composer Béla Bartók presented an original solution to this problem in his two ballet scores.
- The traditions of classical ballet in Bartók's ballets were literally supplanted by an innovative approach to the genre, which became an obstruction to the successful stage fate of his works.
- The originality of Bartok's ballet scores is based on the prevalence of instrumental symphonic music techniques. This feature determines the peculiarity in the analysis of these works.
CURRICULUM
ORBIS LITTERARUM
- The development of the baroque book is shown on the sources first introduced into scientific circulation.
- An excellent master of the Baroque book was the Antwerp printer Balthasar Moretus, who recruited his friend Peter Paul Rubens to work.
- The emergence of a new allegorical thinking, when allegory becomes the norm of artistic vocabulary, is shown on the example of the title pages of books.
The Russian piano school is a unique phenomenon in the global cultural space, a multifaceted and creative phenomenon, a source of creative insights and vivid interpretations. The history of Russian piano performance is deeply and comprehensively studied and is characterized by a wide semantic range. A special place in it is occupied by educational and methodical literature produced by major music publishers in Moscow and St. Petersburg during their formation and development.
The appeal to this topic is connected with the need to create a primary idea of the activities of music publishers for the production of educational materials in the historical dynamics and perspective. This complex process can be perceived as a synthesis of European traditions and Russian experience — a multidimensional multifunctional landscape of the era, illustrative reflection of important events in the cultural life of the country.
The specificity of the problem has an impressive demonstration volume. It includes the strategy and tactics of development of Russian music publishing companies, production of educational and scientific-methodical literature by Russian and foreign authors, stages in the development of piano art, increase in the production output, achievements of the Russian piano school and its unique pedagogical experience.
“P. Jurgenson” company’s catalogues, stored in the Russian State library, reflect the trends and directions that were dominant in the educational literature for piano. They include well-established, tested methods of piano playing, collections of exercises, and anthologies that enriched the pedagogical repertoire with compositions to develop of the technical base of students and expand the arsenal of its expressive means. The study aims at a primary classification of “P. Jurgenson” publishing house’s educational resources recorded in its catalogues of the late 19th — early 20th century.
Information for Authors
ISSN 2588-0047 (Online)